메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국노동법학회 노동법학 노동법학 제27호
발행연도
2008.9
수록면
65 - 96 (32page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Unlike Germany, where industry-wide bargaining is general, Korean Labor Law does not specify any regulations admitting the 'Advantageousness Idea'. There has been many controversies on whether the idea of advantageousness can be applied under Korean Labor Law, still there not exists a firm stance on the issue.
Regarding that the legislation purpose and its basic ideology of Trade Union & Industrial Relations Mediation Act are to maintain and improve the working conditions and to improve the economic and social status of workers by securing the workers' right of association, collective bargaining and collective action pursuant to the Constitution, the Advantageousness Idea must be admitted for granted, in my view, when determining priorities between collective bargaining agreement, rules of employment, and employment contract.
Considering two things-controversies are ongoing on whether an employment contract should be admitted as a source of law, and the real form of an employment contract, Advantageousness Idea should be applied between a collective bargaining agreement and rule of employment under normal cases. In reality, there are not many cases which require a review when applying the Idea. In my view, the Advantageousness Idea should be applied only when the employer suggests enhanced working conditions to an individual, after concluding a collective agreement.
However, advise to be cautious on the case the such overhasty and indiscreet application of Idea would have the current collective agreement to lose its purpose, which can enable an employee to lose his opportunity to seek for better work conditions in the future. Such concerns should be prevented by prudently applying Article 81 of the Trade Union & Industrial Relations Meditation Act on unfair labor practice. In other words, one should admit Advantageousness Idea as a grand principle, but review the conditions of the unfair labor practices. Then one may invalidate his working condition when unfair practices apparently concluded.
With General Binding Force of collective bargaining agreement, labor union members should not be discriminated by applying the same working conditions of non-union members. This is a contradictory case when Trade Union & Industrial Relations Meditation Act violates labor's three major rights. In this case, Advantageousness Idea should not be applied, instead collective bargaining agreement should be applied to all members, so that working condition could be identical to both union and non-union members.

목차

Ⅰ. 문제의 제기
Ⅱ. 유리의 원칙의 적용가능성에 대한 제 견해
Ⅲ. 종래의 논의에 대한 검토
Ⅳ. 단체협약의 일반적 구속력과 유리의 원칙: 유ㆍ불리의 판단기준과 관련하여
Ⅴ. 글을 맺으며
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0