지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Intellectual's Thoughts on the Cooperation among the Three East Asian Countries in the late 19th Century(Cho, Jae-Con)
In the later half of the 19th, Korean, japanese and Chinese Intellectuals suggested that the three East Asian countries should unite in order to overcome the threat of Western Powers. Many scholars paid attention to the theory of solidarity among the three countries, so that this theory is closely related with the historical theme. This study aims to examine the ideas of intellectuals that had to be the movement to , enlighten and civilize' country.
At that time, intellectuals claimed that the cooperation among the three countries could save East Asia from the threats of Western Powers, and most of intellectuals were impacted on the modernized japan. Especially, Kim ok-kyun and his colleagues had to be adapted the japanese movement to 'enlighten and civilize' such as Fukuzawa Yukichi. Kim ok-kyun and his faction wanted to establish the country to be 'enlighten and civilize'. Therefore, they needed to adopt japanese political concepts and institutions. However, Kim ok-kyun was to be insufficient the concepts of the modernization and to be short the more progressive supports.
After that, Yu kil-chun and An kyong-su also claimed the solidarity among the three countries to realize peace in East Asia. Yu kil-chun had a hopeful view of the japanese; he had no idea to overcome the crisis. Eventually, he was an intellectual of weakness. Moreover, An kyong-su insisted on defense alliance with japan to protect East Asia from Western Powers. The problem, however, was to lead the japanese expansive ambitions in Korea.
In the late part of 19th century and early part of the 20th century, most of Korean intellectuals had idea of the cooperation among three countries. The problem was the differences in the historical experiences and situations of the three countries. These differences led to a fundamental difference in the political purposes and intentions of Korean intellectuals with those of japanese intellectuals. Many intellectuals wanted to be 'enlighten and civilize' country. Eventually, Korea was forced colonization by the japanese. So intellectuals, claimed the solidarity among the three East Asian countries, were not seen the looks on affirmation.
In the later half of the 19th, Korean, japanese and Chinese Intellectuals suggested that the three East Asian countries should unite in order to overcome the threat of Western Powers. Many scholars paid attention to the theory of solidarity among the three countries, so that this theory is closely related with the historical theme. This study aims to examine the ideas of intellectuals that had to be the movement to , enlighten and civilize' country.
At that time, intellectuals claimed that the cooperation among the three countries could save East Asia from the threats of Western Powers, and most of intellectuals were impacted on the modernized japan. Especially, Kim ok-kyun and his colleagues had to be adapted the japanese movement to 'enlighten and civilize' such as Fukuzawa Yukichi. Kim ok-kyun and his faction wanted to establish the country to be 'enlighten and civilize'. Therefore, they needed to adopt japanese political concepts and institutions. However, Kim ok-kyun was to be insufficient the concepts of the modernization and to be short the more progressive supports.
After that, Yu kil-chun and An kyong-su also claimed the solidarity among the three countries to realize peace in East Asia. Yu kil-chun had a hopeful view of the japanese; he had no idea to overcome the crisis. Eventually, he was an intellectual of weakness. Moreover, An kyong-su insisted on defense alliance with japan to protect East Asia from Western Powers. The problem, however, was to lead the japanese expansive ambitions in Korea.
In the late part of 19th century and early part of the 20th century, most of Korean intellectuals had idea of the cooperation among three countries. The problem was the differences in the historical experiences and situations of the three countries. These differences led to a fundamental difference in the political purposes and intentions of Korean intellectuals with those of japanese intellectuals. Many intellectuals wanted to be 'enlighten and civilize' country. Eventually, Korea was forced colonization by the japanese. So intellectuals, claimed the solidarity among the three East Asian countries, were not seen the looks on affirmation.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 삼국제휴론의 대두와 수용
3. 개화인사들의 인식과 논리
4. 맺음말
《Abstract》
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Korean Intellectuals and the 1970s
Korea Journal
1971 .05
-
The Image of Korean Intellectuals
Korea Journal
1968 .06
-
Economic Thought of Yu Kil-chun (I)
Korea Journal
1978 .07
-
서거 100주년 유길준 연구의 현황과 과제
한국사학보
2013 .11
-
Economic Thought of Yu Kil-chun (II)
Korea Journal
1978 .08
-
19세기 말 영국 지식인과 동아시아 - 유럽중심적 시각의 층위 -
대구사학
2009 .01
-
Intellectuals and Politics in Korea
Korea Journal
1967 .10
-
[Men & Ideas (19)] Yu Kil-chun : A Korean Crusader for Reform
Korea Journal
1972 .12
-
Japanese Studies in Korea
Korea Journal
1965 .06
-
식민지-제국 사상사 다시 쓰기의 새로움과 한계
역사비평
2011 .11
-
근대 계몽기 한국과 일본 지식인의 ‘보호국론’ 비교 연구
동북아역사논총
2009 .06
-
Intellectual Context of Korean Studies in Colonial Korea
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
1998 .09
-
Nationalism and Colonialism in Japan’s “Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere” in World War Ⅱ
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2005 .06
-
韓日兩國의 歷史認識問題
사학연구
2003 .12
-
냉전기 일본 진보파 지식인의 한국 인식 : 『세카이』의 북송·한일회담 보도를 중심으로
동북아역사논총
2011 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0