지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Articles below illustrate relevant facts about the theater reformation that took place in the early modern Korea.
A. Hwangsung Shinmoon, 1909.4.18 ? “Kyunggo Yulsah Kwanja(警告律社觀者)”
B. Hwangsung Shinmoon, 1909.4.30 ? “Sochik Yiha Yi Hyupryulsah Habul Hyukpah(詔勅已下而協律社何不革罷)”
C. Daehan Maeil Shinbo, 1908.7.8 ? “Keunkeum Kukmoon Soseol Jeoja Ui Juyi(近今國文小說著者의 注意)”
D. Daehan Maeil Shinbo, 1908.7.12 ? “Keukgyae Gaelyangnon(劇界改良論)”
E. Daehan Maeil Shinbo, 1908.11.8 ? “Yeonkeukgyae Ji Yi Yin-jik(演劇界之李人稙)”
F. Daehan Maeil Shinbo, 1909.11.9∼12.4 ? “Cheonheedangsihwa(天喜堂詩話)”
G. Daehan Maeil Shinbo, 1909.12.2 - “Soseolga Ui Chuse(小說家의 趨勢)”
The comment on theater reform is comprised of articles A and B and also constitutes theory proposed in C. Both C and D can be further explained through F, and F also has its influences on G in certain ways. The relationships between the seven written pieces of Danjae Shin Chae-ho can be illustrated as seen below:
1<SUP>st</SUP>: Details on a specific genre(A→B, D→E, C→G, “Non Hakkyoyong Gah(論學校用歌)”→F)
2<SUP>nd</SUP>: Concentration on a different genre(A?B+C→D, C+“Non Hakkyoyong Gah”+D→F, F→G)
Articles A and B, D and E, and C and G are parallel to each other in some aspects. Although it was not thus clearly indicated in the articles, “Non Hakkyoyong Gah” can be viewed as the basis of “Cheonheedangsihwa.” The importance of the link between the two articles is seen in works C and D. Both of these articles explain the reasons for such literary reformation that occurred in early modern literature of Korea.
In article A, the author gives a brief introduction to the readers and tries to persuade them to agree with his ideas on reformations in early modern Korea. The second article, B, consists of cynical criticism on producers: Kim Yong-jae, Choi Sang-don, and Goh Hee-joon. Article D displays the author’s generalized view on theater reform in Korea, while E is more specified and is able to give an outline of the whole process. Article D, in great detail, disproves writer Yi In-jik, therefore it proves to be a negative comment. C is a piece of work done on generalized perception on literary reform, and G is an overall summarization that is aimed towards “Hangangsun(漢江船).” Also, “Non Hakkyoyong Gah” mentioned earlier is included in the work “Cheonheedangsihwa.” As explained above, Danjae’s work on reformation in early modern Korea (C-literature, D,E- theater arts, F-poetry) covering different genres of art shows that his work is a broad observation of artistic movement in Korea. The articles also allow the readers to see the steady progress in which the literary reformation took place. A and B focus on reformation of theater arts, while C puts its emphasis on literary works and presents lyrics revision of “Non Hakkyoyong Gah.” Also, articles D and E continue to illustrate the progression in theater arts and through article F on poetry, the advanced development of liberal arts can be witnessed. The structure in which Danjae has followed while completing his work allows the readers to thoroughly observe each step of reformation that took place in early modern Korea. Danjae Shin Chae-ho’s work displayed his view on theater reform in early modern Korea. Through the writing style that was used by him in his articles, it was also possible to see that he had taken an active part in Hwangsung Shinmoon. Also, his plan for improvement in theater reform as well as for progression in Korean liberal arts allowed the readers to integrate all his articles to better understand the reformation directly.
A. Hwangsung Shinmoon, 1909.4.18 ? “Kyunggo Yulsah Kwanja(警告律社觀者)”
B. Hwangsung Shinmoon, 1909.4.30 ? “Sochik Yiha Yi Hyupryulsah Habul Hyukpah(詔勅已下而協律社何不革罷)”
C. Daehan Maeil Shinbo, 1908.7.8 ? “Keunkeum Kukmoon Soseol Jeoja Ui Juyi(近今國文小說著者의 注意)”
D. Daehan Maeil Shinbo, 1908.7.12 ? “Keukgyae Gaelyangnon(劇界改良論)”
E. Daehan Maeil Shinbo, 1908.11.8 ? “Yeonkeukgyae Ji Yi Yin-jik(演劇界之李人稙)”
F. Daehan Maeil Shinbo, 1909.11.9∼12.4 ? “Cheonheedangsihwa(天喜堂詩話)”
G. Daehan Maeil Shinbo, 1909.12.2 - “Soseolga Ui Chuse(小說家의 趨勢)”
The comment on theater reform is comprised of articles A and B and also constitutes theory proposed in C. Both C and D can be further explained through F, and F also has its influences on G in certain ways. The relationships between the seven written pieces of Danjae Shin Chae-ho can be illustrated as seen below:
1<SUP>st</SUP>: Details on a specific genre(A→B, D→E, C→G, “Non Hakkyoyong Gah(論學校用歌)”→F)
2<SUP>nd</SUP>: Concentration on a different genre(A?B+C→D, C+“Non Hakkyoyong Gah”+D→F, F→G)
Articles A and B, D and E, and C and G are parallel to each other in some aspects. Although it was not thus clearly indicated in the articles, “Non Hakkyoyong Gah” can be viewed as the basis of “Cheonheedangsihwa.” The importance of the link between the two articles is seen in works C and D. Both of these articles explain the reasons for such literary reformation that occurred in early modern literature of Korea.
In article A, the author gives a brief introduction to the readers and tries to persuade them to agree with his ideas on reformations in early modern Korea. The second article, B, consists of cynical criticism on producers: Kim Yong-jae, Choi Sang-don, and Goh Hee-joon. Article D displays the author’s generalized view on theater reform in Korea, while E is more specified and is able to give an outline of the whole process. Article D, in great detail, disproves writer Yi In-jik, therefore it proves to be a negative comment. C is a piece of work done on generalized perception on literary reform, and G is an overall summarization that is aimed towards “Hangangsun(漢江船).” Also, “Non Hakkyoyong Gah” mentioned earlier is included in the work “Cheonheedangsihwa.” As explained above, Danjae’s work on reformation in early modern Korea (C-literature, D,E- theater arts, F-poetry) covering different genres of art shows that his work is a broad observation of artistic movement in Korea. The articles also allow the readers to see the steady progress in which the literary reformation took place. A and B focus on reformation of theater arts, while C puts its emphasis on literary works and presents lyrics revision of “Non Hakkyoyong Gah.” Also, articles D and E continue to illustrate the progression in theater arts and through article F on poetry, the advanced development of liberal arts can be witnessed. The structure in which Danjae has followed while completing his work allows the readers to thoroughly observe each step of reformation that took place in early modern Korea. Danjae Shin Chae-ho’s work displayed his view on theater reform in early modern Korea. Through the writing style that was used by him in his articles, it was also possible to see that he had taken an active part in Hwangsung Shinmoon. Also, his plan for improvement in theater reform as well as for progression in Korean liberal arts allowed the readers to integrate all his articles to better understand the reformation directly.
목차
1. 들어가는 말
2. 글의 내적 논리와 단재 사상
3. 연극개량론 형성의 전후
4. 마무리
참고문헌
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (10)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 강현조 / 2007 / <귀의성> 판본 연구 / 현대소설연구 (35) : 89 ~ 104
2. [단행본] - 권오만 / 1989 / 개화기시가연구 / 새문사
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김재석 / 2001 / 개화기 연극 개량론의 성격 / 인문과학 : 37 ~ 58
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김주현 / 2005 / 국문 창제 요의설(了義說)을 통한 [천희당시화]의 저자 규명 / 어문학 (87) : 481 ~ 518
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김주현 / 2005 / [천희당시화]의 저자 확정 문제 / 우리말글 33 : 271 ~ 306
2. [단행본] - 권오만 / 1989 / 개화기시가연구 / 새문사
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김재석 / 2001 / 개화기 연극 개량론의 성격 / 인문과학 : 37 ~ 58
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김주현 / 2005 / 국문 창제 요의설(了義說)을 통한 [천희당시화]의 저자 규명 / 어문학 (87) : 481 ~ 518
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김주현 / 2005 / [천희당시화]의 저자 확정 문제 / 우리말글 33 : 271 ~ 306
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
벽혈단심(碧血丹心), 단재와 벽초의 우정
역사연구
2019 .12
-
「천희당시화」의 저자 확정 문제
우리말글
2005 .04
-
『단재 신채호 전집』편찬의 의의와 과제 : 「역사편」을 중심으로
한국독립운동사연구
2008 .06
-
신채호의 서찰로 알려진 한시의 진위 고증
국어국문학
2020 .09
-
「천희당시화」의 성격과 위상
어문학
2006 .03
-
단재 신채호의 문학과 정전의 문제
현대소설연구
2007 .12
-
윤백남의 연극개량론 연구
어문학
2012 .06
-
한국 근대 초기 문학의 탈식민주의적 연구 : 단재 신채호를 중심으로
어문학
2009 .09
-
1960년대 ‘연극 대중화’ 운동과 ‘대중’ 담론
인문언어
2009 .01
-
신채호 집필 추정 작품에 대한 저자 논증
한국독립운동사연구
2016 .02
-
단재 전집 간행과 문학편의 문제점 고찰
한국독립운동사연구
2008 .06
-
근대기의 한국연극과 한국 근대극운동의 특징
한국문학과 예술
2009 .09
-
Korean Theater, Past and Present
Korea Journal
1980 .03
-
Reorientation of the English Translation of Korean Theater
번역학연구
2006 .03
-
All Believers Are Prophets: Social Spirituality for the Third Reformation
신학과 철학
2017 .01
-
단재 소설 <용과 용의 대격전>의 내용 및 형식
어문연구
2005 .01
-
정관관계의 변화와 행정개혁－ 전후 일본의 행정개혁을 중심으로 －
日本學硏究
2003 .01
-
국문 창제 요의설(了義說)을 통한 「천희당시화」의 저자 규명
어문학
2005 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0