지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This research is a study of Ryukyu's creation myths in some history books. It examines the differences among the myths and analyses their mythological and political meaning in terms of "rewriting" myth and "canonizing" national history.
Ryukyu had been the tributary state of China. After invade of Japan(satsuma) in 1609, Ryukyu must pay tribute to Japan. As the result, Ryukyu became the periphery of dual center, not only China but also Japan. In this period, Ryukyu published some history books like as "Chuzanseikan(中山世鑑)", "chuzanseihu(中山世譜)", and "kyuyou(球陽)", and recorded Ryukyu's creation myth in these history books. The recorded myths had some differences each other and are differ from the Ryukyu's original creation myth in "Omorosousi(おもろさうし)", too. Every myth was "rewrited" for intended purpose.
The study begins from verification of the differences among the myths and interprets their mythogical meaning. The myth in "Chuzanseikan(中山世鑑)", means that Ryukyu is a God kingdom. Ryukyu's terrritory, hierachy and farming ritual has sacred origin. In "chuzanseihu(中山世譜)", the myth says that Ryukyu is the result of natural principle, "Yin and Yang(陰陽說)". Especially, the myth written by Saion(蔡溫), shows the territory of Ryukyu is not only the result if Yin and Yang but also the creature of divinity, too.
These differences of meaning is the result of the writers' rewriting purpose. Under the tangled international circumstances, the aim of rewriting is to settle Ryukyu's national location. The myth in "Chuzanseikan(中山世鑑)" places Ryukyu on the periphery of Japan, for example, by imitating Japan's creation myth. Japan becomes the ideal future of Ryukyu in "Chuzanseikan(中山世鑑)". But the other books says that Ryukyu is the periphery of China. Saion(蔡溫)'s "chuzanseihu (中山世譜)" and ""kyuyou(球陽)" show that they seek for new way of Ryukyu with sustaining the old relation to China. The cause of their inclination is writer's lineage and educational background. The writers of "chuzanseihu(中山世譜)" and ""kyuyou(球陽)" are the scholars of Chinese classics and people of "kumemura(久米村)", where the posterity from China have lived in.
This study approached the Ryukyu's creation myths of history books as the discourses about national position. These discourses are the origins of imagining Ryukyu as a community and looking for its national identity.
Ryukyu had been the tributary state of China. After invade of Japan(satsuma) in 1609, Ryukyu must pay tribute to Japan. As the result, Ryukyu became the periphery of dual center, not only China but also Japan. In this period, Ryukyu published some history books like as "Chuzanseikan(中山世鑑)", "chuzanseihu(中山世譜)", and "kyuyou(球陽)", and recorded Ryukyu's creation myth in these history books. The recorded myths had some differences each other and are differ from the Ryukyu's original creation myth in "Omorosousi(おもろさうし)", too. Every myth was "rewrited" for intended purpose.
The study begins from verification of the differences among the myths and interprets their mythogical meaning. The myth in "Chuzanseikan(中山世鑑)", means that Ryukyu is a God kingdom. Ryukyu's terrritory, hierachy and farming ritual has sacred origin. In "chuzanseihu(中山世譜)", the myth says that Ryukyu is the result of natural principle, "Yin and Yang(陰陽說)". Especially, the myth written by Saion(蔡溫), shows the territory of Ryukyu is not only the result if Yin and Yang but also the creature of divinity, too.
These differences of meaning is the result of the writers' rewriting purpose. Under the tangled international circumstances, the aim of rewriting is to settle Ryukyu's national location. The myth in "Chuzanseikan(中山世鑑)" places Ryukyu on the periphery of Japan, for example, by imitating Japan's creation myth. Japan becomes the ideal future of Ryukyu in "Chuzanseikan(中山世鑑)". But the other books says that Ryukyu is the periphery of China. Saion(蔡溫)'s "chuzanseihu (中山世譜)" and ""kyuyou(球陽)" show that they seek for new way of Ryukyu with sustaining the old relation to China. The cause of their inclination is writer's lineage and educational background. The writers of "chuzanseihu(中山世譜)" and ""kyuyou(球陽)" are the scholars of Chinese classics and people of "kumemura(久米村)", where the posterity from China have lived in.
This study approached the Ryukyu's creation myths of history books as the discourses about national position. These discourses are the origins of imagining Ryukyu as a community and looking for its national identity.
목차
1. 서론
2. 개벽신화 재편의 실제
3. 신화 재편의 배경과 의도: 문헌의 성격과 기록자의 위치
4. 개벽신화 재편의 담론적 의미
5. 결론
〈참고문헌〉
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
17․18세기 류큐(琉球) 곡물 기원 신화의 재편과 류큐 왕권의 논리
대동문화연구
2012 .01
-
19세기 후반 일본의 琉球병탄과 淸과의 영토분쟁 처리 : 琉球 분할소유 방안을 중심으로
역사와경계
2007 .12
-
국교 두절 하, 朝鮮․琉球 양국 사절단의 北京 접촉
대동문화연구
2009 .01
-
조선시대 필기 야담집 속 琉球 체험과 형상화
한문학논집(漢文學論集)
2011 .01
-
逆水行舟 : 从喜舎場朝賢《琉球見聞録》看琉球的两属问题
해항도시문화교섭학
2014 .10
-
류큐⋅오키나와(인)의 아이덴티티 형성사 －문학 텍스트를 중심으로－
日本學硏究
2011 .01
-
정순칙의 ｢중산동원팔경시｣로 본 오키나와의 경관
일본문화연구
2018 .01
-
야만의 섬에서 ‘中華的’ 他者까지 : 전근대 중국이 구성한 ‘琉球’ 공간에 대한 분석
중어중문학
2018 .12
-
琉球列島における標準語教育と琉球語教育の歴史と実践
日本語敎育
2019 .01
-
류큐 국왕 신화의 문헌 기록과 구비 전승
인문과학연구
2014 .09
-
明朝와 琉球간 冊封 朝貢외교의 실체 -萬曆年間(1573-1620), 명조의 琉球정책을 중심으로-
중국사연구
2008 .01
-
15~19세기 琉球人의 朝鮮 漂着과 送還 실태 : 『朝鮮王朝實錄』을 중심으로
지방사와 지방문화
2012 .05
-
류큐(琉球) 왕부 오고에(御後繪)의 왕권적 성격
日本學硏究
2018 .01
-
『해동제국기』의 일본국 · 유구국 지도에 대하여
한일관계사연구
2018 .02
-
김비의(金非衣) 일행의 표류체험과 유구(琉球)제도에 대한 인식
한국문학과 예술
2019 .06
-
『해동제국기』 의 「유구국지도」 와 오키나와현립박물관 소장 「유구국도」
동북아역사논총
2016 .03
-
류큐 왕조의 아마미코 신화와 현대 구비전승
국어문학
2007 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-910-018365928