지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article searched for how to get a successful integration of traditional and clinical methodologies in the upcoming graduate-level Korean law school education. There is a compelling need to change legal education in Korea in significant ways. Until now most Korean undergraduate-level law schools are not committed to preparing students for practice. It is generally conceded that most law school graduates are not as prepared for law practice as they could be and should be. The author strongly encourages Korean legal educators to do the following jobs.
First, teaching 'think like a lawyer' is not enough, but giving a complete lawyering skills ('act like a lawyer') to the students would not an easy job for the time being in Korea. Instead the primary goal of legal education should be to develop competence, that is, the ability to resolve legal problems effectively and responsibly.
Second, The program of instruction should integrates the teaching of theory, doctrine, and practice. Legal educators should integrate the teaching of theory, doctrine, and practice. They should recognize the value of both as important subjects for teaching and scholarship. They must avoid being too narrow, devoting too much time to honing the ability to analyze doctrine and too little to developing other abilities. Blending of traditional and clinical methodologies should occur in all areas of the law.
Third, Law schools should help students acquire the attributes of effective, responsible lawyers including self-reflection and lifelong learning skills, intellectual and analytical skills, core knowledge and understanding of law, professional skills, and professionalism.
Fourth, Outcomes-focused education is becoming the norm throughout higher education. Law schools should shift from content-focused programs of instruction to outcomes-focused programs of instruction that are concerned with what students will be able to do and how they will do it, as well as what they will know on their first day in law practice
Fifth, the author contends that theories should be drawn from real world phenomena. Theorists should attempt to devise solutions that have some chance of success given existing political and economic conditions. The common sense jurisprudence calls upon theorists to explain or package their works so as to make them accessible and useful to practicing attorneys.
First, teaching 'think like a lawyer' is not enough, but giving a complete lawyering skills ('act like a lawyer') to the students would not an easy job for the time being in Korea. Instead the primary goal of legal education should be to develop competence, that is, the ability to resolve legal problems effectively and responsibly.
Second, The program of instruction should integrates the teaching of theory, doctrine, and practice. Legal educators should integrate the teaching of theory, doctrine, and practice. They should recognize the value of both as important subjects for teaching and scholarship. They must avoid being too narrow, devoting too much time to honing the ability to analyze doctrine and too little to developing other abilities. Blending of traditional and clinical methodologies should occur in all areas of the law.
Third, Law schools should help students acquire the attributes of effective, responsible lawyers including self-reflection and lifelong learning skills, intellectual and analytical skills, core knowledge and understanding of law, professional skills, and professionalism.
Fourth, Outcomes-focused education is becoming the norm throughout higher education. Law schools should shift from content-focused programs of instruction to outcomes-focused programs of instruction that are concerned with what students will be able to do and how they will do it, as well as what they will know on their first day in law practice
Fifth, the author contends that theories should be drawn from real world phenomena. Theorists should attempt to devise solutions that have some chance of success given existing political and economic conditions. The common sense jurisprudence calls upon theorists to explain or package their works so as to make them accessible and useful to practicing attorneys.
목차
Ⅰ. 문제의 제기와 선행연구물들
Ⅱ. 이론과 실무의 관계
Ⅲ. 結果定向敎育을 향한 지구적 추세(The Global Movement Toward Outcomes-Focused Education)
Ⅳ. 연구자교원과 실무가교원의 교차노출
Ⅴ. 이론교육과 실무교육의 시너자이징
Ⅵ. 결어
참고문헌
Abstract
토론문
참고문헌 (10)
참고문헌 신청
1. [기타자료] - 김종철 / 2005 / 법학전문대학원에서의 교육내용과 방법에 대한 소견 / 동아법학(동아대학교 법학연구소) 제37호 : 289 ~ 331
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김종철 / 2006 / 법학교육 - 주제발표 (세계화시대의 법학교육의 과제와 전망) / 저스티스 (92) : 149 ~ 167
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 신양균 / 2008 / 로스쿨에서 형사소송법 교육 / 형사법연구 20 (3) : 27 ~ 48
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이상원 / 2008 / 로스쿨에서의 형사실무 교육방법 / 형사법연구 20 (3) : 49 ~ 76
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이승호 / 2008 / 로스쿨에서의 형법교육방법 / 형사법연구 20 (3) : 3 ~ 26
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김종철 / 2006 / 법학교육 - 주제발표 (세계화시대의 법학교육의 과제와 전망) / 저스티스 (92) : 149 ~ 167
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 신양균 / 2008 / 로스쿨에서 형사소송법 교육 / 형사법연구 20 (3) : 27 ~ 48
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이상원 / 2008 / 로스쿨에서의 형사실무 교육방법 / 형사법연구 20 (3) : 49 ~ 76
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이승호 / 2008 / 로스쿨에서의 형법교육방법 / 형사법연구 20 (3) : 3 ~ 26
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
LEGAL EDUCATION AND PRACTICE OF LAW IN JAPAN
저스티스
1974 .12
-
로스쿨에서의 형사실무 교육방법
형사법연구
2008 .01
-
법학전문대학원의 형사법교육
서강법학
2008 .12
-
공법교육에서의 이론교육과 실무교육의 조화
서강법학
2008 .12
-
로스쿨에서 형사소송법 교육
형사법연구
2008 .01
-
법학전문대학원에서의 법학초보자 교육프로그램의 구상
法學論文集
2009 .01
-
세계화 시대의 한국의 법학교육
동아법학
2006 .06
-
일본 법과대학원에 있어서의 민사법의 이론교육과 실무교육의 조화
서강법학
2008 .12
-
새 법학교육체제의 운영방안 : 법학전문대학원 교육의 지향점과 실무교육방안을 중심으로
저스티스
2010 .06
-
법학전문대학원에서의 임상법학교육방법론
원광법학
2008 .01
-
인공지능 알고리즘과 법교육 - 법교육 발전 방향에 대한 제언 -
법교육연구
2019 .01
-
충남대학교 법학전문대학원의 민법 교육과정 및 교육방법
법학연구
2008 .12
-
법학교육의 과제
사회이론
2002 .06
-
바람직한 민법학 교육방법 : 개인적인 경험을 기초로 한 극히 주관적인 모델의 제시
저스티스
2012 .10
-
법학교육방법의 개선방향
고려법학
2009 .01
-
臨床法學敎育에 관한 一考 : 미국의 경우를 중심으로
법학논총
2005 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-018275303