지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Korean law school system aims to change the system of choosing lawyers from selective examination system which has lasted for about sixty years to educating lawyer system. Now we meet a turning point of adequately mixing deductive reasoning method of legal education and inductive reasoning method by introduction of U. S. law school system. This two methodologies are contrary to each other. But these days the countries of Anglo- American law system and those of Continental law system are using other's methodology in legal education. So we must to pay attention to the fact that two methodologies are approaching mutually.
Some professors misunderstand that 'practice' of practical education in korean law school is mere activity of writing legal documents like a complaint or a letter of complaint for lawsuit and learning lawyer's skills. Practical learning in law school is synthesis of every legal education on legal reasoning methods as like discovering law (involving legal theory and statutes)or improving ability of legal reasoning to resolve actual human problems. These activities are comprehensively called "lawyering" in U. S. law school.
Professors who have practical career as an attorney at law or a judge or a prosecutor(as they say 'practical professors')have used judical precedents for resolving actual cases during practical working period. Therefore practical professors have to teach precedents discriminately to students analyzing reversely and reproducing concerned cases as complete actual case in comparison to theoretical professors' teaching method.
Theoretical professors and practical professors who have to produce capable lawyers(problem-solver) must cooperate to achieve congruence between theoretical education and practical education of public law in korean law school.
Basically law school is the educational institute where they educate practically capable lawyers. And jurisprudence is practical study. The relationship between legal theoretical education and practical education is same as the relationship of wagon's two wheels which can't operate respectively. Legal theories which don't correspond with legal practices will gradually disappear and legal practices without back-up of legal theories are mere forms. Communication between legal theoretical professors and practical professors have to be made everywhere and every time. That is the shortcut to reduce trior and error relating to legal education in a short time.
Finally, we must abstain from making light of teaching public law in law school. We have to be afraid of making a mistake which ignores the reality that law school graduates will be not only lawyer but also public official, politician and pressman.
In this thesis I emphasized the importance of proper understanding on 'practice' of legal practical education and of achieving congruence between legal theoretical education and practical education in korean law school.
Some professors misunderstand that 'practice' of practical education in korean law school is mere activity of writing legal documents like a complaint or a letter of complaint for lawsuit and learning lawyer's skills. Practical learning in law school is synthesis of every legal education on legal reasoning methods as like discovering law (involving legal theory and statutes)or improving ability of legal reasoning to resolve actual human problems. These activities are comprehensively called "lawyering" in U. S. law school.
Professors who have practical career as an attorney at law or a judge or a prosecutor(as they say 'practical professors')have used judical precedents for resolving actual cases during practical working period. Therefore practical professors have to teach precedents discriminately to students analyzing reversely and reproducing concerned cases as complete actual case in comparison to theoretical professors' teaching method.
Theoretical professors and practical professors who have to produce capable lawyers(problem-solver) must cooperate to achieve congruence between theoretical education and practical education of public law in korean law school.
Basically law school is the educational institute where they educate practically capable lawyers. And jurisprudence is practical study. The relationship between legal theoretical education and practical education is same as the relationship of wagon's two wheels which can't operate respectively. Legal theories which don't correspond with legal practices will gradually disappear and legal practices without back-up of legal theories are mere forms. Communication between legal theoretical professors and practical professors have to be made everywhere and every time. That is the shortcut to reduce trior and error relating to legal education in a short time.
Finally, we must abstain from making light of teaching public law in law school. We have to be afraid of making a mistake which ignores the reality that law school graduates will be not only lawyer but also public official, politician and pressman.
In this thesis I emphasized the importance of proper understanding on 'practice' of legal practical education and of achieving congruence between legal theoretical education and practical education in korean law school.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 법학전문대학원에서의 실무교육의 의미와 범위
Ⅲ. 공법실무교육에서 무엇을 어떻게 가르칠 것인가?
Ⅳ. 공법에서의 법학이론교육과 실무교육과의 조화
Ⅴ. 실무교육의 목표, 교육에 대한 평가
Ⅵ. 마치며
참고문헌
Abstract
토론문
참고문헌 (21)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
로스쿨에서의 형사실무 교육방법
형사법연구
2008 .01
-
LEGAL EDUCATION AND PRACTICE OF LAW IN JAPAN
저스티스
1974 .12
-
세계화 시대의 한국의 법학교육
동아법학
2006 .06
-
인공지능 알고리즘과 법교육 - 법교육 발전 방향에 대한 제언 -
법교육연구
2019 .01
-
로스쿨에서 형사소송법 교육
형사법연구
2008 .01
-
법조인 양성을 위한 법학전문대학원의 교육 방향
저스티스
2011 .06
-
Teaching Common Law in A Country without Common Law Tradition : Its Necessity and Approach
법학논총
2012 .01
-
일본 법과대학원에 있어서의 민사법의 이론교육과 실무교육의 조화
서강법학
2008 .12
-
법학전문대학원에서의 법학초보자 교육프로그램의 구상
法學論文集
2009 .01
-
법학전문대학원의 형사법교육
서강법학
2008 .12
-
형사법에서의 이론교육과 실무교육의 조화
서강법학
2008 .12
-
법학전문대학원에서의 임상법학교육방법론
원광법학
2008 .01
-
법학교육의 과제
사회이론
2002 .06
-
Legal Education and Observation of Law in the United State
법정논총
1981 .02
-
교육목적의 법적 규정에 대한 교육철학적 논의
교육사상연구
2009 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-018275318