메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
서강대학교 법학연구소 서강법학 서강법학 제10권 제2호
발행연도
2008.12
수록면
27 - 71 (45page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Korean law school system aims to change the system of choosing lawyers from selective examination system which has lasted for about sixty years to educating lawyer system. Now we meet a turning point of adequately mixing deductive reasoning method of legal education and inductive reasoning method by introduction of U. S. law school system. This two methodologies are contrary to each other. But these days the countries of Anglo- American law system and those of Continental law system are using other's methodology in legal education. So we must to pay attention to the fact that two methodologies are approaching mutually.
Some professors misunderstand that 'practice' of practical education in korean law school is mere activity of writing legal documents like a complaint or a letter of complaint for lawsuit and learning lawyer's skills. Practical learning in law school is synthesis of every legal education on legal reasoning methods as like discovering law (involving legal theory and statutes)or improving ability of legal reasoning to resolve actual human problems. These activities are comprehensively called "lawyering" in U. S. law school.
Professors who have practical career as an attorney at law or a judge or a prosecutor(as they say 'practical professors')have used judical precedents for resolving actual cases during practical working period. Therefore practical professors have to teach precedents discriminately to students analyzing reversely and reproducing concerned cases as complete actual case in comparison to theoretical professors' teaching method.
Theoretical professors and practical professors who have to produce capable lawyers(problem-solver) must cooperate to achieve congruence between theoretical education and practical education of public law in korean law school.
Basically law school is the educational institute where they educate practically capable lawyers. And jurisprudence is practical study. The relationship between legal theoretical education and practical education is same as the relationship of wagon's two wheels which can't operate respectively. Legal theories which don't correspond with legal practices will gradually disappear and legal practices without back-up of legal theories are mere forms. Communication between legal theoretical professors and practical professors have to be made everywhere and every time. That is the shortcut to reduce trior and error relating to legal education in a short time.
Finally, we must abstain from making light of teaching public law in law school. We have to be afraid of making a mistake which ignores the reality that law school graduates will be not only lawyer but also public official, politician and pressman.
In this thesis I emphasized the importance of proper understanding on 'practice' of legal practical education and of achieving congruence between legal theoretical education and practical education in korean law school.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 법학전문대학원에서의 실무교육의 의미와 범위
Ⅲ. 공법실무교육에서 무엇을 어떻게 가르칠 것인가?
Ⅳ. 공법에서의 법학이론교육과 실무교육과의 조화
Ⅴ. 실무교육의 목표, 교육에 대한 평가
Ⅵ. 마치며
참고문헌
Abstract
토론문

참고문헌 (21)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-018275318