지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this paper is to seek for some instructive references by way of cross-Pacific reviewing and comparing: (ⅰ) the debate in the United States over the abolition of the federal estate tax under the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act in 2001 and (ⅱ) the introduction of so-called catch-all clause in the Korean Inheritance and Gift Tax Act in 2003. It looks clear that both the above issues are not easily solved because in each of the issues the confronting positions have equipped their longstanding economic and ideological bases in terms of the tax theory.
Notwithstanding, some conclusions might be derived through the working by this paper as follows:
In light of the debate in the U.S. over the abolition of the estate tax, it seems very obscure that the transfer taxes, i.e, the estate tax and gift tax, are essential to secure both the horizontal equity by redistribution of wealth and the revenue facility in spite of their modern nature of steep progressivity. To state more clearly, we need to do more economical and empirical analysis and to review much more whether the ideological goal is sound and reasonable. Through this job, we can find the right way to achieve a higher level of horizontal equity and efficiency simultaneously, and also catch up with the global trend in the area of transfer taxation. As a starting point, I propose to change the incomplete form of the current estate tax system in Korea to the complete form of inheritance tax system as Germany does.
In case of the introduction of the catch-all clause in the Korean Gift Tax, there exists a substantial obstacle for the clause to overcome the judicial review over the constitutionality arising from the rule of law in the area of taxation. Given the recent attitude of the Korean Constitution Court on the subject issue, I expect the clause to survive the judicial review eventually. Nevertheless, in my opinion, from the standpoint of the logical and unified implementation of the transfer taxation, it is desirable that the current gift tax system under which certain type of capital gains are taxed be changed to the pure transfer taxation system excluding such capital gains to which the income tax is applied.
Notwithstanding, some conclusions might be derived through the working by this paper as follows:
In light of the debate in the U.S. over the abolition of the estate tax, it seems very obscure that the transfer taxes, i.e, the estate tax and gift tax, are essential to secure both the horizontal equity by redistribution of wealth and the revenue facility in spite of their modern nature of steep progressivity. To state more clearly, we need to do more economical and empirical analysis and to review much more whether the ideological goal is sound and reasonable. Through this job, we can find the right way to achieve a higher level of horizontal equity and efficiency simultaneously, and also catch up with the global trend in the area of transfer taxation. As a starting point, I propose to change the incomplete form of the current estate tax system in Korea to the complete form of inheritance tax system as Germany does.
In case of the introduction of the catch-all clause in the Korean Gift Tax, there exists a substantial obstacle for the clause to overcome the judicial review over the constitutionality arising from the rule of law in the area of taxation. Given the recent attitude of the Korean Constitution Court on the subject issue, I expect the clause to survive the judicial review eventually. Nevertheless, in my opinion, from the standpoint of the logical and unified implementation of the transfer taxation, it is desirable that the current gift tax system under which certain type of capital gains are taxed be changed to the pure transfer taxation system excluding such capital gains to which the income tax is applied.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론 - 이 글의 검토 배경 및 고찰 범위
Ⅱ. 미국의 유산ㆍ증여과세 존폐론
Ⅲ. 우리 나라의 완전포괄주의 증여과세
Ⅳ. 결론
參考文獻
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
증여세 완전포괄주의에 관한 연구
홍익법학
2011 .01
-
일본 상속 및 증여세법의 고찰 및 동북아시아에의 시사점
동북아법연구
2014 .01
-
미국의 상속세 폐지에 관한 연구 : 찬ㆍ반 양론을 중심으로
조세학술논집
2004 .02
-
보유과세강화가 조세부담의 형평성에 미치는 효과
한국지방재정논집
2003 .12
-
자산의 저가·고가 양도시 양도소득세,증여세의 이중과세에 관한 연구
중앙법학
2009 .08
-
지방세법상 토지과표의 개선방안
법학연구
2005 .12
-
상속 및 증여세제의 개정과정과 주요국의 동향을 통한 향후 개선방향
경영사연구
2017 .01
-
국세기본법과 지방세기본법의 통합과 체제 개편에 관한 연구
아태비즈니스연구
2018 .01
-
해외 부동산투자와 조세문제
조세학술논집
2007 .02
-
현행소득과세제도와 조세공평주의
법학연구
2007 .06
-
관세법상의 가산세에 관한 사례연구
관세학회지
2004 .02
-
지방세 세목이전과 기초재원 확충방안
지방자치법연구
2005 .01
-
주요국의 상속세 과세제도 비교 및 시사점 : 인적․물적공제 및 세율제도를 중심으로
조세연구
2018 .09
-
중소기업 조세지원제도의 유효성 분석
국제회계연구
2002 .11
-
기업경영 개선을 위한 세제개선방안 -세제의 중립성확대를 통한 기업경쟁력제고-
경영법률
2009 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-018449385