지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2009.8
- 수록면
- 359 - 369 (11page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The core categories that can be drawn up after the analysis of the research topic through theoretical sensitivity are equality, indifference, multipurpose facilities, maintenance, resolving conflicting opinions, advanced notification, systematic policy measures, and respect for self-reliance. The data collected for close examination of collective selfishness shown toward the construction of a sports facility for the disabled shows that research participants L1 and H, who both experienced friction that stemmed from collective selfishness, equates the disabled to nondisabled people. On the other hand, participant L2, who never encountered friction due to collective selfishness, was merely aware of the discriminatory treatment that the disabled received in society through media outlets. Participant S was found to have no interest toward the disabled. Overall, the analysis results show that direct or indirect experiences with the disabled can have positive effects for nondisabled people to understand people with disabilities. Therefore, it is necessary for the government to create policies and foundations to raise public awareness toward the disabled and thus make it possible for awareness education to be carried out at public facilities, such as at schools.
Second, the analysis of opposing and supporting data toward the sports facility for the disabled shows that the majority of the research participants want the facility to be built, only with consideration to the residential area and if it is open to both the disabled and nondisabled people. They also hoped for a thorough maintenance of the facility, but participant S expressed doubt toward the overall effectiveness of the facility. Participant H, who experienced friction stemming from collective selfishness, exhibited fears toward people with mental disabilities and called for not only a thorough maintenance of the facility but also a strict supervision over people with disabilities. The remarks given by participants S and H shows how previous policies regarding welfare for the disabled were arbitrarily led by the government and that they failed to receive public trust. In the case of participant H's fear of people with mental disability, it has been analyzed that the fear has stemmed from direct or indirect experiences of getting harmed by a person or people with mental disability.
Third, after analyzing the suggestions for improvements, most of the research participants were found to be hoping for the construction of a sports facility for the disabled if the plans were to be notified to the residents of the community in advance and if the conflicting views were to be resolved beforehand. Participant H hoped for a change in public perception of the disabled, through government policy measures and hoped for the measures to become institutionalized. Participant L1 hoped for the public to first respect the self-reliance of the disabled and wanted the facility to be disability-friendly. Therefore, the analysis suggests the public and the government should first acknowledge the self-reliance of the disabled and the government should lead in building a disability-friendly facility after notifying the construction plans in advance and resolving the conflicting opinions of the public. In other words, the government should develop relevant programs that can provide the public with systematic measures to solve the collective selfishness shown toward the construction of facilities for the disabled. After conflicting opinions are resolved, a disability-friendly facility can be built. The public must respect the self-reliance of the disabled and the facility should be open to both the disabled and nondisabled people.
Second, the analysis of opposing and supporting data toward the sports facility for the disabled shows that the majority of the research participants want the facility to be built, only with consideration to the residential area and if it is open to both the disabled and nondisabled people. They also hoped for a thorough maintenance of the facility, but participant S expressed doubt toward the overall effectiveness of the facility. Participant H, who experienced friction stemming from collective selfishness, exhibited fears toward people with mental disabilities and called for not only a thorough maintenance of the facility but also a strict supervision over people with disabilities. The remarks given by participants S and H shows how previous policies regarding welfare for the disabled were arbitrarily led by the government and that they failed to receive public trust. In the case of participant H's fear of people with mental disability, it has been analyzed that the fear has stemmed from direct or indirect experiences of getting harmed by a person or people with mental disability.
Third, after analyzing the suggestions for improvements, most of the research participants were found to be hoping for the construction of a sports facility for the disabled if the plans were to be notified to the residents of the community in advance and if the conflicting views were to be resolved beforehand. Participant H hoped for a change in public perception of the disabled, through government policy measures and hoped for the measures to become institutionalized. Participant L1 hoped for the public to first respect the self-reliance of the disabled and wanted the facility to be disability-friendly. Therefore, the analysis suggests the public and the government should first acknowledge the self-reliance of the disabled and the government should lead in building a disability-friendly facility after notifying the construction plans in advance and resolving the conflicting opinions of the public. In other words, the government should develop relevant programs that can provide the public with systematic measures to solve the collective selfishness shown toward the construction of facilities for the disabled. After conflicting opinions are resolved, a disability-friendly facility can be built. The public must respect the self-reliance of the disabled and the facility should be open to both the disabled and nondisabled people.
목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 장애자체육시설의 수용에 대한 집단ㆍ지역 이기주의
Ⅳ. 장애인체육시설 수용에 대한 지역ㆍ집단 이기주의 대한 요약
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
장애인 사용자 경험에 기반한 공공편의시설 접근성 평가 : 주민센터를 중심으로
한국실내디자인학회 논문집
2010 .02
-
장애인 체육으로서 태권도의 역할
한국체육과학회지
2020 .02
-
MAP FOR DISABLED PEOPLE
한국디자인학회 국제초대전도록
2020 .07
-
장애인 체육시설 조직에 대한 공중관계성이 장애인의 만족 및 재방문의도에 미치는 영향
한국체육과학회지
2015 .06
-
日本の障害者スポーツと法をめぐる現状と課題
스포츠엔터테인먼트와 법
2007 .01
-
지체장애인의 생활체육 참여유형에 따른 신체적 자기개념과 생활체육 참여 만족도 비교
한국사회체육학회지
2010 .02
-
장애인 주거현황 진단 및 지역사회 기반 장애인 주거대안
한국실내디자인학회 논문집
2019 .06
-
우리나라 장애인 엘리트체육 정책의 문제점과 행정 조직의 개편에 관한 연구
한국특수체육학회지
2005 .01
-
장애인의 문화시설 이용현황 연구
한국디자인학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2019 .05
-
장애인차별금지법에 대한 건축 관련법의 보완에 관한 연구 : 문화예술시설을 중심으로
한국실내디자인학회 논문집
2011 .12
-
장애인과 비장애인이 지각하는 장애인 전국체육대회 서비스 품질 비교 : 수정된 IPA기법 적용
한국체육과학회지
2020 .10
-
장애인 체육의 활성화에 관한 문헌적 분석 연구
한국특수체육학회지
2003 .01
-
재가지체장애인 자립증진을 위한 주택계획특성의 개발과 실증
한국실내디자인학회 학술대회논문집
2016 .05
-
대학생이 인식하는 장애인스포츠 이미지 분석
한국체육과학회지
2014 .10
-
장애인 여가 실태조사를 통한 생활체육 활성화 방안 연구
한국사회체육학회지
2007 .09
-
전국장애청소년체육대회 현황 및 발전방향 모색
한국사회체육학회지
2009 .05
-
장애인의 신체활동 참여 제약요인에 대한 체계적 문헌 고찰
한국체육과학회지
2017 .02
-
장애인체육의 현실적 문제와 행정부서 변경
한국특수체육학회지
2005 .01
-
이동식 휠체어 리프트 디자인 연구
Archives of Design Research
2002 .11
-
대규모 공연장의 휠체어 사용자를 위한 편의시설 실태와 만족도
한국실내디자인학회 학술대회논문집
2020 .05
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-692-018820601