지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (3)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Based on the grammaticalization theory suggesting that the grammatical morphemes are developed gradually out of lexical morphemes, this article maintains that the diverse Russian modal auxiliaries(modals) not only have been developed or changed in meaning out of lexical items, but also have been gradually shifted to grammat icalstatus, although the stages of the development differs according to the perspectives.
Russian modal meanings are expressed by various morphological, syntactic, and lexical categories. While in English and German the modals have specific morpho-syntactic properties and are well established in grammar, in Russian the category of modals is not an established notion and is treated as a lexical phenomenon. It means that the modal system of Russian is not grammaticalized as the Germanic system is.
Russian modals exhibit diverse morphological and syntactic manifestations. Russian modal auxiliaries, which are served as predicates in sentence and can be combined with a main verb, can take the forms of verbs, adjectives or adverbs. Personal modals require a subject in the nominative, while impersonal modals require a subject in the dative. Thus, they do not form a closed set and can only be determined by being located on a grammaticalization chain extending from content words with a lexical meaning to function words with a grammatical meaning. In this way, auxiliation can be understood as a partial phenomenon from lexical-syntactic expressions to free-grammatical expressions of a concept.
This article tries to examine through the five mechanisms of semantic change, proposed by Bybee et al.(1994); metaphorical extension, inference or the conventionalization of implicature, generalization, harmony, and absorption of contextual meaning.
Among the modals only dol?en and mo?’ can express epistemic modality owing to metaphorical extension. The motion verb idti/xodit’ alone could not proceed from spatial meaning to modal auxiliary's meaning, but with the suffix -sja through metonymic inference. The modal predicates dol en and nel’zja lost specific features of meaning and thus show generalization in meaning and specialization in function.
Having examined the mechanisms of grammaticalization, this article compiles the results of stages in the following table.
〈표 삽입〉
In conclusion, with the grammaticalization theory we could not only categorize the modal auxiliary system more insightfully, but also explain why these modals are so different from English and German counterparts. The modal system of Russian is not as grammaticalized as these counterparts, but the development of modals in Russian shows very interesting gradual transitional evolution from a lexical status into more or less grammatical status as well as the interference phenomena with diverse levels and types of grammaticality.
Russian modal meanings are expressed by various morphological, syntactic, and lexical categories. While in English and German the modals have specific morpho-syntactic properties and are well established in grammar, in Russian the category of modals is not an established notion and is treated as a lexical phenomenon. It means that the modal system of Russian is not grammaticalized as the Germanic system is.
Russian modals exhibit diverse morphological and syntactic manifestations. Russian modal auxiliaries, which are served as predicates in sentence and can be combined with a main verb, can take the forms of verbs, adjectives or adverbs. Personal modals require a subject in the nominative, while impersonal modals require a subject in the dative. Thus, they do not form a closed set and can only be determined by being located on a grammaticalization chain extending from content words with a lexical meaning to function words with a grammatical meaning. In this way, auxiliation can be understood as a partial phenomenon from lexical-syntactic expressions to free-grammatical expressions of a concept.
This article tries to examine through the five mechanisms of semantic change, proposed by Bybee et al.(1994); metaphorical extension, inference or the conventionalization of implicature, generalization, harmony, and absorption of contextual meaning.
Among the modals only dol?en and mo?’ can express epistemic modality owing to metaphorical extension. The motion verb idti/xodit’ alone could not proceed from spatial meaning to modal auxiliary's meaning, but with the suffix -sja through metonymic inference. The modal predicates dol en and nel’zja lost specific features of meaning and thus show generalization in meaning and specialization in function.
Having examined the mechanisms of grammaticalization, this article compiles the results of stages in the following table.
〈표 삽입〉
In conclusion, with the grammaticalization theory we could not only categorize the modal auxiliary system more insightfully, but also explain why these modals are so different from English and German counterparts. The modal system of Russian is not as grammaticalized as these counterparts, but the development of modals in Russian shows very interesting gradual transitional evolution from a lexical status into more or less grammatical status as well as the interference phenomena with diverse levels and types of grammaticality.
목차
1. 서론
2. 서법성의 분류
3. 러시아어 양상술어의 보조화에서 사용되는 문법화의 기제
4. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (27)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 강소영 / 2002 / [확연], [당연], [개연]의 양태표지 연구 / 한국어학 16 : 1 ~ 236
2. [단행본] - 강흥주 / 2005 / 고대교회 슬라브어 / 한국외국어대학교 출판부
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 유성렬 / 2000 / 독어·영어 서법조동사(Modalverb)의 통사적 특성과 구조 / 독어교육 19 : 207 ~ 237
4. [단행본] - 이성하 / 1998 / 문법화의 이해 / 한국문화사
5. [학위논문] - 정연우 / 2007 / 러시아어에서 필요성과 관련된 서법적 표현의 문법화 연구 / 박사 / 한국외국어대학교
2. [단행본] - 강흥주 / 2005 / 고대교회 슬라브어 / 한국외국어대학교 출판부
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 유성렬 / 2000 / 독어·영어 서법조동사(Modalverb)의 통사적 특성과 구조 / 독어교육 19 : 207 ~ 237
4. [단행본] - 이성하 / 1998 / 문법화의 이해 / 한국문화사
5. [학위논문] - 정연우 / 2007 / 러시아어에서 필요성과 관련된 서법적 표현의 문법화 연구 / 박사 / 한국외국어대학교
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
러시아어의 필요성과 관련된 양상술어의 문법화
노어노문학
2008 .06
-
러시아어 인상술어에 대한 통사적 고찰: 양상조동사(modals)를 중심으로
외국학연구
2012 .01
-
English Modal Auxiliaries on Grammaticalization Chain
언어과학연구
2002 .09
-
러시아어 양상보조사의 문법화 변수
슬라브학보
2009 .12
-
Grammaticalization of Quasi-Modal Auxiliaries : with Special Reference to be going to and have to
언어과학연구
2003 .03
-
A Comparative Analysis of Grammaticalization in English and Korean Modal Auxiliaries
담화·인지언어학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2003 .06
-
영어 중첩 서법조동사의 통사적 구조
열린정신 인문학연구
2007 .06
-
Modal Particles and Their Projections : A Minimalist Approach
어학연구
2013 .04
-
A corpus-based study on the weak obligation modals : Should, ought to and had better
영어학
2008 .06
-
러시아어 양상보조사의 문법화 변수
한국노어노문학회 학술대회 발표집
2009 .06
-
Modal Categories and Dynamic Modality in English
영어학
2017 .12
-
영어와 한국어의 법성표현 대조연구
언어과학연구
1993 .12
-
조동사 NEED의 쇠퇴에 대한 코퍼스 연구
영어학연구
2011 .01
-
세계 영어의 지역적 차이에 대한 말뭉치 분석연구
새한영어영문학
2007 .05
-
Perception and Production of English Modal Verbs by Korean University Students in Written Academic Discourse
언어과학연구
2017 .06
-
추측을 나타내는 양태 표현의 문법 제약 : 문법적 연어구성을 중심으로
언어
2011 .12
-
汉语情态动词"要"与韩语相应情态词尾的对比 —— 以语义、句法特征为中心 —
한중언어문화연구
2019 .01
-
양상조동사에 대한 담화적 고찰
새한영어영문학
2005 .11
-
Translating Modal Verbs: An Effective Way to Teach EFL Learners
통번역교육연구
2018 .01
-
대응 분석을 통한 서법 조동사의 범언어적 분포 연구
인문언어
2018 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-309-018824432