지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The main purpose of this research is to look into what caused to make the Japan-Korea Annexation Treaty(1910) possible in terms of the antagonistic relationship between Japan and the United States after Russia-Japanese War (1904-1905). The W.H.Taft administration of U.S did not allow Japanese exclusive monopoly over the territory of Manchuria in China. Thus, Japan tried to build the mutual assistance system with Russia so that they could counteract against U.S. In the mean time, Russia tried to take advantage from the complicated situation between Japan and U.S. Eventually, Russia allowed Japan's plan on Annexation Treaty over Korean peninsula in order to assure the safety of region of Russian Far East in return. Therefore, I would like to categorize the period from the Agreement between China and Japan relative to Chientao, and concerning the Mines and Railways in Manchuria(1909.9.4), through the Japan-Korea Annexation Treaty into 3 stages in terms of macro perspective.
The 1st stage is period of formulating a new international relationship regarding to the issue of Manchuria in China between U.S. Japan, and Russia due to the agreement between China and Japan relative to Chien tao, and concerning the Mines and Railways in Manchuria(1909.9.4). In this stage, the Russia and Japan. the previous two countries system which was divided by the North and South Manchuria region eventually has been expanded into triangular system which runs by U.S. Japan, and Russia. The expansion to three countries was possible since U.S has been engaged into the Manchuria region issue in China through claiming against the Agreement between China and Japan relative to Chientao, and concerning the Mines and Railways In Manchuria(1909.9.4). The visit to Harbin by Hirobumi Ito who was once claiming to install the patrolling police station in Chien tao was also possible in order to attempt to present the reconciliation gesture toward to Russia.
The 2nd stage is period of promoting a mutual approach by Russia and Japan in order to defend their special interest which once already settled down to Manchuria region and tried to set back the claim by the U.S Secretary of State, P. Knox. The plan by P. Knox which originally providing loan installment to China so that China could obtain every railway system and allowed them to utilize it only in commercial purpose. However, the plan led the two countries. Japan and Russia's different interest into one unified interest to defend their previous ownership over Manchuria.
The 3rd stage is period of formalizing an official form of treaty by Russia and Japan's previous joint response against the neutralizing plan of railway system in Manchuria region by U.S. This stage would be started from the 2nd Negotiation period of treaty by Japan and Russia in March of 1910 through the declaration of Japan-Korea Annexation Treaty in the 29th of August of 1910.
Since the relationship between Japan and U.S has turned into conflict situation, Japan would like to get an agreement with Russia in the level as a military alliance. Thus, finally Japan had reached an agreement with Russia that Japan would recognize the Russians' special interest over Mongolia and Manchuria regions and Russia would allow the Japan-Korea Annexation Treaty by Japan in return. Thus, the Japan's plan of Korea Annexation Treat would be an outcome as a result of the second Russo-Japanese Agreement relating to Manchuria while challenging against the East Asia policy by U.S. At the same time, the Koreans independence would be achieved when the relationship between Japan and Russia gets worse and if U.S wins war over Japan. However, in such adverse circumstances around the world, the letter of King Gojong was delivered to Russian delegation in Shanghai, which contains of asking for political asylum in Vladivostok and not to sign the agreement of the Russia-Japan Treaty to the emperor of the Russia. The letter from King Gojong was not successfully achieved from what actually originally intended, however, it would be acknowledged as an expression of willingness to keep off the Japan-Korea Annexation Treaty along with the help from Russia and not to sign the treaty if all other options failed.
The 1st stage is period of formulating a new international relationship regarding to the issue of Manchuria in China between U.S. Japan, and Russia due to the agreement between China and Japan relative to Chien tao, and concerning the Mines and Railways in Manchuria(1909.9.4). In this stage, the Russia and Japan. the previous two countries system which was divided by the North and South Manchuria region eventually has been expanded into triangular system which runs by U.S. Japan, and Russia. The expansion to three countries was possible since U.S has been engaged into the Manchuria region issue in China through claiming against the Agreement between China and Japan relative to Chientao, and concerning the Mines and Railways In Manchuria(1909.9.4). The visit to Harbin by Hirobumi Ito who was once claiming to install the patrolling police station in Chien tao was also possible in order to attempt to present the reconciliation gesture toward to Russia.
The 2nd stage is period of promoting a mutual approach by Russia and Japan in order to defend their special interest which once already settled down to Manchuria region and tried to set back the claim by the U.S Secretary of State, P. Knox. The plan by P. Knox which originally providing loan installment to China so that China could obtain every railway system and allowed them to utilize it only in commercial purpose. However, the plan led the two countries. Japan and Russia's different interest into one unified interest to defend their previous ownership over Manchuria.
The 3rd stage is period of formalizing an official form of treaty by Russia and Japan's previous joint response against the neutralizing plan of railway system in Manchuria region by U.S. This stage would be started from the 2nd Negotiation period of treaty by Japan and Russia in March of 1910 through the declaration of Japan-Korea Annexation Treaty in the 29th of August of 1910.
Since the relationship between Japan and U.S has turned into conflict situation, Japan would like to get an agreement with Russia in the level as a military alliance. Thus, finally Japan had reached an agreement with Russia that Japan would recognize the Russians' special interest over Mongolia and Manchuria regions and Russia would allow the Japan-Korea Annexation Treaty by Japan in return. Thus, the Japan's plan of Korea Annexation Treat would be an outcome as a result of the second Russo-Japanese Agreement relating to Manchuria while challenging against the East Asia policy by U.S. At the same time, the Koreans independence would be achieved when the relationship between Japan and Russia gets worse and if U.S wins war over Japan. However, in such adverse circumstances around the world, the letter of King Gojong was delivered to Russian delegation in Shanghai, which contains of asking for political asylum in Vladivostok and not to sign the agreement of the Russia-Japan Treaty to the emperor of the Russia. The letter from King Gojong was not successfully achieved from what actually originally intended, however, it would be acknowledged as an expression of willingness to keep off the Japan-Korea Annexation Treaty along with the help from Russia and not to sign the treaty if all other options failed.
#간도 및 만주5안건 관련 협약(1909.9.4)
#제2차 러일협약
#만주철도중립화안
#한일병합조약
#고종의 블라디보스톡 망명요청친서
#Agreement between China and Japan relative to Chientao and concerning the Mines and Railways in Manchuria (1909.9.4)
#The Second Russo-Japanese Agreement relating to Manchuria(1910.7.4)
#The Neutralization of all the railways in Manchuria
#Japan-Korea Annexation Treaty
#Letter of King Gojong asking for political asylum in Vladivostok
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. ‘간도와 만주5안건에 관한 청일협약’과 미국의 대일견제
Ⅲ. 미국의 만주철도중립화정책과 일본의 대러접근정책
Ⅳ. 제2차 러일협약체결과 일본의 한국병합
Ⅴ. 맺음말
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
특사 태프트의 제2차 대일방문과 미일조약체제, 1907~1908 : 한국병합을 중심으로
동북아역사논총
2010 .09
-
언론을 통해 본 한일협정 인식 50년
역사비평
2015 .05
-
Korean Perceptions of Japan during the Great Han Empire and the Japanese Annexation of Korea
Korea Journal
2011 .12
-
Korea and Japan
Korea Journal
1967 .08
-
러시아의 극동정책과 간도
동북아역사논총
2009 .09
-
독도 영유권에 대한 전후 연합국의 영토처리
일본문화학보
2020 .05
-
Treaties Leading to Japan’s Annexation of Korea : What Are the Problems?
Korea Journal
2016 .12
-
창과 방패의 딜레마: 1929년 제3회 IPR회의의 만주 논쟁
중국사연구
2015 .01
-
Korean Studies in Japan
Korea Journal
1985 .12
-
Several Present Conditions Defining 100 Years of Japan’s Annexation of Korea
Korea Journal
2010 .12
-
러일의 내몽골 분할협약 연구 (1912 ) : 제3차 러일협약 체결 과정을 중심으로
영토해양연구
2013 .06
-
푸틴-아베시대 러-일 평화조약 체결교섭에서 본 분쟁4도의 군사안보적 중요성
슬라브학보
2020 .09
-
‘거대한 게임’과 영국의 극동 탐사활동에 관한 연구
史叢(사총)
2009 .01
-
러일전쟁 직전 러시아의 압록강 삼림채벌권 활용을 통해 본 한ㆍ러 경제관계의 성격
역사와 담론
2010 .08
-
「만주국」 조선인의 ‘皇國臣民’觀 : 1930년대 후반을 중심으로
역사와경계
2009 .09
-
한국 강제병합 과정에 대한 재조명 : 한일구조약의 불법·무효성에 관한 법학적 연구
동북아역사논총
2010 .09
-
한일협정 후 한국 지식인의 일본 인식
동북아역사논총
2011 .09
-
아베시대 일·러 영토교섭 -1956년 일소공동선언을 중심으로-
슬라브학보
2019 .12
-
일제강점기 만주행 作家들의 내면과 心象地理 : 백석과 이효석의 러시아에 대한 동경을 중심으로
한국학연구
2016 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-911-002013477