지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
한국 강제병합 과정에 대한 재조명 : 한일구조약의 불법·무효성에 관한 법학적 연구
Reexamining the Process of Japan's Annexation of Korea Focusing on Illegality of the Prewar Treaties Forced on Korea by Japan
이용수
한국 강제병합 과정에 대한 재조명 : 한일구조약의 불법·무효성에 관한 법학적 연구
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article reexamines the process of Japan’s Annexation of Korea focusing on illegality of the prewar treaties forced on Korea by Japan, in particular the 1905 and 1910 treaties.This author raises three points in arguing the illegality of the process of Japan’s attempt to have colonized Korea.
Korea was a sovereign Empire in 1905, when Japan demanded that Korea should accept the Japanese proposal of a protectorate treaty. The Korean Empire, however, resisted the Imperial Japanese Government’s demand. The treaty was signed by then Korean Foreign Minister, who was forced to do so by Ito, Hirobumi accampanied by the Japanese military forces. It was, however, not ratified by Emperor Kojong, who had the sovereign power to conclude treaties.
First, this author found the report of the United Nations International Law Commission (1963, Part II, p. 197), which raised the case of the 1905 Protectorate Treaty of Korea by Japan as one of the four major examples of this kind in history where treaties did not take any effect because of coercion of representatives. His report on this was submitted as a written NGO statement by IFOR to the UN Commission on Human Rights in 1993 (E/CN.4/1993/NGO/36).
Second, as this was not enough for the Japanese government to change its position that they considered the treaty had legal effect with no illegality, the author, by researching into the original treaty documents in Japan, tries to confirm the findings made by Prof. Yi, Taijin, who, on the basis of his researches on the original treaty documents in Korea and insisted that the 1905 treaty was forged by the Japanese government.
Third, the Japanese government has been insisting that the 1905 treaty did not require any ratification by Emperor Kojong. There were no substantial researches on this issue by the international law experts except for some scholars in history or international relations studies in Japan. Prof. Paik, Choong Hyun, who taught international law at Seoul National University criticized the Japanese government’s position and wrote that ratification was necessary for the prewar five treaties forced on Korea by Japan including the 1905 and 1910 treaties that eroded the sovereignty of Korea. The author, responding to the researches made by late Prof. Paik, looks into practices in Hollandand the international law textbooks published before 1905 in Japan to find then standard views on need for ratification of treaties.
Lastly, the author explores the reasons why the Japanese experts have kept silence for 100 years on these issues. He proposes two major tasks, which could make difference for peace and prosperity in the Northeast Asian Area in the next 100 years.
Korea was a sovereign Empire in 1905, when Japan demanded that Korea should accept the Japanese proposal of a protectorate treaty. The Korean Empire, however, resisted the Imperial Japanese Government’s demand. The treaty was signed by then Korean Foreign Minister, who was forced to do so by Ito, Hirobumi accampanied by the Japanese military forces. It was, however, not ratified by Emperor Kojong, who had the sovereign power to conclude treaties.
First, this author found the report of the United Nations International Law Commission (1963, Part II, p. 197), which raised the case of the 1905 Protectorate Treaty of Korea by Japan as one of the four major examples of this kind in history where treaties did not take any effect because of coercion of representatives. His report on this was submitted as a written NGO statement by IFOR to the UN Commission on Human Rights in 1993 (E/CN.4/1993/NGO/36).
Second, as this was not enough for the Japanese government to change its position that they considered the treaty had legal effect with no illegality, the author, by researching into the original treaty documents in Japan, tries to confirm the findings made by Prof. Yi, Taijin, who, on the basis of his researches on the original treaty documents in Korea and insisted that the 1905 treaty was forged by the Japanese government.
Third, the Japanese government has been insisting that the 1905 treaty did not require any ratification by Emperor Kojong. There were no substantial researches on this issue by the international law experts except for some scholars in history or international relations studies in Japan. Prof. Paik, Choong Hyun, who taught international law at Seoul National University criticized the Japanese government’s position and wrote that ratification was necessary for the prewar five treaties forced on Korea by Japan including the 1905 and 1910 treaties that eroded the sovereignty of Korea. The author, responding to the researches made by late Prof. Paik, looks into practices in Hollandand the international law textbooks published before 1905 in Japan to find then standard views on need for ratification of treaties.
Lastly, the author explores the reasons why the Japanese experts have kept silence for 100 years on these issues. He proposes two major tasks, which could make difference for peace and prosperity in the Northeast Asian Area in the next 100 years.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말: 이 글의 과제에 대하여
Ⅱ. 본론: 연구성과에 관한 보고
Ⅲ. 맺음말: 정리
참고문헌
[ABSTRACT]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Treaties Leading to Japan’s Annexation of Korea : What Are the Problems?
Korea Journal
2016 .12
-
1910년 한일조약에 대한 법사학적 재검토
동북아역사논총
2010 .09
-
조약법을 통해 본 1910년 병합조약의 무효 : 강제에 의한 조약의 효력을 중심으로
동북아역사논총
2010 .09
-
朝英條約(1883. 11)과 불평등조약체제의 재정립
한국사연구
2006 .12
-
특사 태프트의 제2차 대일방문과 미일조약체제, 1907~1908 : 한국병합을 중심으로
동북아역사논총
2010 .09
-
[특집2 : 1960년대 한반도와 국제정세] 한·일협정 체결과 '지역통합전략'의 현실화 - 한·미·일 3국의 인식과 대응을 중심으로 -
역사와현실
2003 .12
-
언론을 통해 본 한일협정 인식 50년
역사비평
2015 .05
-
The Illegality of the Forced Treaties Leading to Japan`s Annexation of the Great Han Empire : A Discussion of Japan`s Annexation of Korea in Terms of Its Illegality
Korea Journal
1996 .12
-
戰後 韓日관계와 샌프란시스코 平和條約
한국사연구
2005 .12
-
강제병합 100년과 성장의 공공성
역사비평
2010 .08
-
1899 Treaty and Its Impact on the Development of the Chinese-Korean Trade (1895-1905)
Korea Journal
1991 .12
-
한일회담 시기 청구권 문제의 기원과 미국의 역할
한국사연구
2005 .12
-
근대중국의 불평등조약 중 선교조항의 선교적 이중성
신학과 목회
2015 .05
-
프랑스의 1960년대 한국 대외정책 인식: 한일협정을 중심으로
史叢(사총)
2015 .01
-
김정한의 미발표작 「잃어버린 山所」 연구
국어국문학
2017 .09
-
간도문제와 일본의 한국병합(1909-1910)
한국사연구
2009 .06
-
한일회담에서 나타난 일본의 식민지지배 인식
한국사연구
2005 .12
-
일본의 조선 강점기 성노예제에 대한 국가책임의 해법
일본문화학보
2014 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
첫번째 댓글을 남겨주세요.
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-910-002365244