메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국슬라브유라시아학회 슬라브학보 슬라브학보 제20권 1호
발행연도
2005.6
수록면
419 - 449 (31page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The Uniate Church was established in the Brest Sobor in 1596. This church recognized the Pope as the supreme power of the church in place of the Patriarch, and accepted the 'filioque' in the religious dogma. This point was the different thing as compared with the previous system of the then Russian Church. But the Uniate Church kept still the tradition and custom in the old style, in the Orthodox style. So I can regard the Uniate Church as the complex, mixed type of the western and eastern church in the christian world.
The background of the Uniate Church establishment has a long history: the Florence Council in 1439, the Moscow Metropolitanate in 1448, and the Kiev Metropolitanate. it is a very important factor to make Church Union that the Reformation occurred in the first half of 16th century and consequently followed the Counter-Reformation and finally formed the Moscow Patriarchate in 1589. Most of the Ruthenian bishops thought to accelerate the Union between the Roman-Catholic Church and the Kiev Metropolitanate of the Russian Orthodox Church.
Peter Skarga played an important role in the formation of the Church Union. Many bishops supported the Union and participated in the process actively in many aspects. This meant the peculiarity of the Kiev Metropolitanate compared with the Moscow Metropolitanate. The pursuit of independence of the Church was the hope of orthodox believers under the control of Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. This hope was found in the idea of Constantin Ostrozhskii who opposed the Brest Union. in the event the formation of the Uniate Church had many problems and this was reflected in the following history.
Why did the Kiev orthodox bishops pursue the Church Union? Firstly, the proliferation of the Reformation might lessen their power and influence over the orthodox believers in the country. Secondly, the Moscow Patriarchate might expand its power into their territory. All these external factors resulted in the reduction of the prestige and influence of the orthodox bishops in the near future. The Kiev bishops led the Church Union, not the Polish King or the Pope of the Catholic Church. The King and the Pope preferred the Ratinization to the Church Union. in the view of Moscow Patriarchate, the Uniate Church was betrayal to the Eastern Orthodox Church. But the internal situation of the Russia prevented her from engaging in the process.
In the conclusion, the Uniate Church was not the genuine single church of the Roman-Catholic and the Orthodox in all respects. The Uniate Church was the politically united church of the two Churches. And it was the 'New Church' concerned with religious and political problems. in the result, the Uniate Church made an identity of the western Ukrainian people, and caused the conflict of the Russian Orthodox Church.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가는 말 : 문제의 제기
Ⅱ. 15-16세기의 정교회와 가톨릭 세계의 변동
Ⅲ. 우니아트 교회의 성립
Ⅳ. 브레스트 교회회의의 결과와 역사적 의의
Ⅴ. 맺는 말
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (15)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-309-018912808