지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this study was to examine a book of the topography of the Joseon(朝鮮) Era titled "Joseon Jijijaryo(『朝鮮地誌資料』" in a bid to shed light on the distribution and nature of irrigation facilities in Gyeonggi Province under the early Japanese occupation. That book was written by Japan in 1911 in a move to rule the nation. It's meant in this study to raise a question about existing argument that the modernization of Korean irrigation facilities was fueled by Japanese colonial policy, and to look into the misguidance of the irrigation policy of the late Joseon Dynasty and the relevant efforts of contemporary self-governing local bodies by Japan.
The selected book offered an overview of irrigation facilities including reservoirs(洑) and dams(堤堰) for each village. Different terms were utilized to refer to reservoirs and dams in that book, since the structure of irrigation facilities were regarded as reservoirs or dams.
During the early Japanese occupation, the irrigation policy didn't work well in Gyeonggi Province. That book portrayed the state of irrigation facilities in the late Joseon Era. The irrigation policy of the 18th century focused on the construction of dams, and more than 300 dams were consequently built in the early 19th century. And then small-scale irrigation facilities, namely reservoirs, were mainly constructed as the government put less efforts into this field in the late 19th century. That book showed the overall state of irrigation facilities in Gyeonggi Province between the late 19th century and the early 20th century.
The distribution of the irrigation facilities in Gyeonggi Province was reviewed in this study in conjunction with the river system of that region that included the Limjin River(臨津江), the Han River(漢江) and Anseongcheon(安城川). The irrigation facilities were primarily located in the upper and lower streams of the rivers. The upper streams of the rivers were among the low mountains that were higher in altitude than plains, and the lower streams were evenly distributed among plains involving ones by the sea.
As a result of analyzing when the reservoirs and dams were repaired, the book mentioned the repairs of just about 10 percent of the facilities, probably because the irrigation facilities were repaired or newly constructed often. The reservoirs and dams were mostly under the management of landlords and their tenants or of village communities. Some of the dams were built and traded by men of wealth in Seoul.
There are some suggestions about future research efforts. First, the symbolic and unique irrigation cases in each village of Gyeonggi Province should be analyzed to acquire more detailed information on the location and maintenance of the facilities. Second, the above-mentioned book that showed the state of nationwide irrigation facilities in the Joseon Dynasty should be more closely analyzed to compare the irrigation facilities of Gyeonggi Province with those of the other regions to get a grip on the specificity of this area. Third, how the traditional irrigation system of our country was ruined during the early Japanese occupation should be studied in more detail, and what made contemporary irrigation facilities reduced to a colonial means of food production should be explored as well by giving concrete examples.
The selected book offered an overview of irrigation facilities including reservoirs(洑) and dams(堤堰) for each village. Different terms were utilized to refer to reservoirs and dams in that book, since the structure of irrigation facilities were regarded as reservoirs or dams.
During the early Japanese occupation, the irrigation policy didn't work well in Gyeonggi Province. That book portrayed the state of irrigation facilities in the late Joseon Era. The irrigation policy of the 18th century focused on the construction of dams, and more than 300 dams were consequently built in the early 19th century. And then small-scale irrigation facilities, namely reservoirs, were mainly constructed as the government put less efforts into this field in the late 19th century. That book showed the overall state of irrigation facilities in Gyeonggi Province between the late 19th century and the early 20th century.
The distribution of the irrigation facilities in Gyeonggi Province was reviewed in this study in conjunction with the river system of that region that included the Limjin River(臨津江), the Han River(漢江) and Anseongcheon(安城川). The irrigation facilities were primarily located in the upper and lower streams of the rivers. The upper streams of the rivers were among the low mountains that were higher in altitude than plains, and the lower streams were evenly distributed among plains involving ones by the sea.
As a result of analyzing when the reservoirs and dams were repaired, the book mentioned the repairs of just about 10 percent of the facilities, probably because the irrigation facilities were repaired or newly constructed often. The reservoirs and dams were mostly under the management of landlords and their tenants or of village communities. Some of the dams were built and traded by men of wealth in Seoul.
There are some suggestions about future research efforts. First, the symbolic and unique irrigation cases in each village of Gyeonggi Province should be analyzed to acquire more detailed information on the location and maintenance of the facilities. Second, the above-mentioned book that showed the state of nationwide irrigation facilities in the Joseon Dynasty should be more closely analyzed to compare the irrigation facilities of Gyeonggi Province with those of the other regions to get a grip on the specificity of this area. Third, how the traditional irrigation system of our country was ruined during the early Japanese occupation should be studied in more detail, and what made contemporary irrigation facilities reduced to a colonial means of food production should be explored as well by giving concrete examples.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 수리시설의 종류와 표기 양상
Ⅲ. 수리시설의 입지와 지역적 분포
Ⅳ. 修築의 배경과 관리운영
Ⅴ. 맺음말
〈부록〉
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한국 근현대 낙동강 유역의 수리조합 연구 - 경상북도 칠곡군의 수리조합을 중심으로 -
대구사학
2013 .01
-
일제하 萬頃江 유역 水利組合 연구
동방학지
2005 .01
-
제천 의림지(義林池)의 수리사적(水利史的) 특징과 의의
민속학연구
2013 .06
-
한국 근현대 경상북도 칠곡군의 수리조합 연구-운영 주체를 중심으로-
대구사학
2014 .01
-
일제시기 영일수리조합의 설립과 운영
역사와경계
2017 .03
-
‘영남농법’과 ‘한국형 지역개발’의 연구방법론 모색
역사학보
2013 .12
-
淸 中葉 陝西省 漢中府의 수리시설과 농업용수 분쟁 : 楊塡堰과 五門堰의 사례를 중심으로
동양사학연구
2006 .03
-
일제시기 경상북도 경주군 서면수리조합과 일본인 농업경영
대구사학
2006 .01
-
서면수리조합 설립에 대한 반대운동
계명사학
2005 .11
-
정조 대 수원화성 수리(水利)시설의 특징과 수리사적(水利史的) 의의
역사민속학
2016 .12
-
중·근세의 농법과수리시설
중앙고고연구
2012 .01
-
1930년대 중후반 일제의 수리조합 정책을 통한 농촌통제 강화
한국독립운동사연구
2017 .11
-
湖南 지역사회 속의 東津水利組合 ― 장기사적 관점에서의 연구서설
대동문화연구
2016 .01
-
일제시기 경상북도 영천군의 금호수리조합과 일본인 농업경영
대구사학
2019 .01
-
한국 고대 국가 형성에 있어서 관개수리 역할의 재고 : 영천 청제를 중심으로
역사와 담론
2009 .04
-
일제시기 경산수리조합의 설립과 운영
대구사학
2017 .01
-
1920ㆍ30년대 水利組合事業에 대한 저항과 주도계층
한국독립운동사연구
2003 .08
-
실패한 식민지 ‘개발’ 프로젝트 : 益山 黃登堤의 廢堤化 사례
한국사학보
2015 .05
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-905-018931774