지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Contrary to expectations that the new administration in Korea would drastically transform the country’s policy on the clarification of the past, there has been little change in the existing mechanism and basic tone of related activities for many reasons. The thorniest issue regarding settlement of the past is mass deaths of civilians during the period from liberation of the country from Japanese colonial rule to the Korean War. This study delves into the differences between and unique characteristics of laws and institutional schemes formulated to reveal the truth of such cases, and touches upon the controversies concerning their implementation, focusing on the purposes and goals of such laws, fact-finding decisions and authority, follow-up actions, and potential issues for the future.
The four acts enacted to accommodate fact-finding efforts and changes in governance and to reflect political interests shed new light on mass deaths in an institutional respect. This simultaneously resulted in institutional imbalance and created multi-layered goals concerning the efforts to discover the truth of similar incidents, affecting the objectives and details of such efforts. Most fact-finding efforts, which entail investigations, reconstruction of incidents, and decision-making, were based on witness remarks and interviews due to lack and unavailability of necessary materials. It has been confirmed that the findings have lower-than-expected credibility.
The credibility of findings depends on the relationships between the state, press, and victims, and the level of acceptance of them. The task to be tackled after discovery of the truth is to seek social acceptance and necessary changes. Progress in this task seems far below our expectations, which implies that substantive headway will be made only when critical thinking is applied to the truth surrounding mass deaths of civilians under a fundamental goal, thereby healing the wounds that were inflicted.
The four acts enacted to accommodate fact-finding efforts and changes in governance and to reflect political interests shed new light on mass deaths in an institutional respect. This simultaneously resulted in institutional imbalance and created multi-layered goals concerning the efforts to discover the truth of similar incidents, affecting the objectives and details of such efforts. Most fact-finding efforts, which entail investigations, reconstruction of incidents, and decision-making, were based on witness remarks and interviews due to lack and unavailability of necessary materials. It has been confirmed that the findings have lower-than-expected credibility.
The credibility of findings depends on the relationships between the state, press, and victims, and the level of acceptance of them. The task to be tackled after discovery of the truth is to seek social acceptance and necessary changes. Progress in this task seems far below our expectations, which implies that substantive headway will be made only when critical thinking is applied to the truth surrounding mass deaths of civilians under a fundamental goal, thereby healing the wounds that were inflicted.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 민간인의 집단적 죽음과 4개의 특별법
3. 사실의 조사에서 진실의 구성으로
4. 진실규명 이후의 과제와 사회적 수용
5. 맺음말
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
The Evolution of the Ŭimunsa Truth Finding Movement and Its Tasks
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2003 .06
-
불교의 이제설과 관련되는 우빠니샤드의 논의
동서철학연구
2018 .01
-
실재론적 진리에서 실천적 정당화로 -인간의 삶과 실천을 중심으로 -
동서철학연구
2019 .01
-
Finding the Truth on the Suspicious Deaths under South Korea’s Military Dictatorship
Korea Journal
2002 .09
-
차이의 진리(차연)와 진리(의 차이): 데리다와 바디우의 접점, 주체에서
화이트헤드연구
2010 .01
-
과거사와 세월호 참사 진상규명을 둘러싼 쟁점과 평가
역사비평
2014 .11
-
현대 한국인을 위한 유교의 죽음 이해
한국학연구
2008 .11
-
The Pragmatic Theory of Truth of William James on Moral and Religious Truths
철학
1971 .04
-
진리 의미론 대 결정이론적 의미론
철학연구
1992 .06
-
10년 전의 기억, 새로움을 위한 제언 : 국방부 과거사진상규명위원회의 5 · 18 조사 활동과 평가
역사비평
2017 .11
-
민간인학살사건 진상규명을 위한 활동의 현황과 과제
제노사이드연구
2007 .02
-
진리에 대한 충실성과 이데올로기의 호명 사이에서 : 알랭 바디우를 통해 김은국의 『순교자』 읽기
인문과학연구
2012 .03
-
나의 죽음
철학과 현실
2010 .12
-
국가기관의 민주화와 과거사청산
역사비평
2010 .11
-
사성제(四聖諦)를 통해 본 불교의 생사관 고찰
한국사상과 문화
2018 .01
-
성숙한 죽음문화의 모색--소극적 안락사의 3가지 대안
불교학연구
2006 .01
-
우리는 진실과 화해를 향하여 어디까지 갈 수 있는가
제노사이드연구
2009 .02
-
민중신학에서 본 장공 김재준의 진리론 : "하나님만 믿고 모험하라!"
한국기독교신학논총
2010 .10
-
정치적인 것의 윤리와 진리
인문과학연구
2012 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-392-002306072