메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
불교학연구회 불교학연구 불교학연구 제15호
발행연도
2006.1
수록면
29 - 54 (26page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Understanding death in the right way is very important. Depending on how well one understands death and in what way one defines death, the discussion on death can lead to denying it or tabooing the issue altogether. Nowadays, the definition of death relies on clinical determination of men's medical condition in such terms as brain death or heart death. Death should not be defined entirely in terms of the collapsing of the body. The founder of Thanatology (the study of death and dying), Qubler-Ross, states that the human has a soul and that defining death means going beyond the realm of the physical and the material to the realm of the soul, the mind, and life itself. In this context, death doesn't exist for two reasons. First, such medical pronouncement as brain death or heart death has functioned so far as the definition of death, thus, there has only been the discourse on the criteria for medical decisions, but not on death itself. Secondly, the death as we know only marks the physical death since the soul begins its journey, separating from the body. In a society where there is only the discourse on the medical criteria for physical death, but not the significance of death itself, people tend to think of physical death as the end of it all. As a result, one witnesses the increase of suicides and increasing number of unhappy death. Therefore for the formation of death-culture I offer three suggestions. First Death-Education, second Living Will or Advance-Directive, third Hospice.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0