메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
박임출 (경원대학교)
저널정보
한국기업법학회 기업법연구 企業法硏究 第24卷 第1號
발행연도
2010.3
수록면
397 - 426 (30page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Short-selling brings risks as well as benefits to securities market. Among such risks, settlement risk is one of the most important reasons to regulate short-selling. While agreeing that short-selling contributes to more efficient market functioning, regulators have not yet found an effective regulatory tool to secure stability of clearing and settlement. The need for regulating short-selling was clearly demonstrated in the recent financial turmoil where many countries rushed to impose a temporary ban on naked short-selling in 2008. More recently, advanced markets such as U.S. are focusing on maximizing the efficiency of short-selling while reducing settlement risk by reforming regulation, including tighter disclosure of individual position.
Reflecting strong concern for short-selling, Korea's regulation prohibits "naked" and exceptionally permits "covered" short-selling. Accordingly, some market participants strongly call for easing of the regulation to vitalize short-selling. Through out the history of American regulation, similar emphasis has been given to both tightening and easing of short-selling regulation, only with different timing. It is notable that IOSCO recommends, on the presence of effective compliance, "flexible regulation", which contributes to more efficient securities market.
This article presents regulatory suggestions, which may enable more effective supervision and enforcement with regard to short-selling within the existing regulatory framework of Korea. First, short-selling regulations, currently existing in different laws and regulations, must be integrated. Second, as the current regulation classifies transactions into three types (naked, covered, non short-selling), it must be indicated by the law that "net position" is a determinant factor for defining short-selling. Third, in line with the current regulation which allows covered short-selling, the concept of "ownership" and "borrowing" must be clearly defined and applied. Fourth, flexible approach must be applied toward pricing regulation since short-selling regulation is only effective in bearish market. Fifth, abusive naked short-selling must be treated as "unfair trading" and equal level of disciplinary measures must be applied.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 주요국의 입법례
Ⅲ. 우리나라의 공매도 규제법제의 현황
Ⅳ. 공매도 규제법제의 개선과제
Ⅵ. 맺음말
參考文獻
〈Abstracts〉

참고문헌 (23)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-366-002240480