지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
A number of studies on agricultural tax paid in kind executed in North Korea before and after the Korean War have been produced. Those studies have a tendency to focus on examining whether or not tax-in-kind was utilized with a means of exploitation by state. But troubles between state and farmers intensified in processes of tax collection have never been paid attention to. This study intends to lighten those troubles surrounding collection of tax-in-kind and ways of arrangement by state. Therefore several ways attracting farmers towards a new system will be revealed too through this work.
Tax-in-kind system revealed serious problems at collection processes because farmers can pay variously according to quality and quantity of kind. This respect implies that farmers can do harm to state. On the other hand assessments of tax-in-kind executed before harvests were utilized with a means of excessive tax collection. The method of assessment calculating weights of harvested crops per pyong(坪) before harvests contained serious defect in accuracy. Therefore there was serious difference between weights of harvested crops per pyong assessed by agents of state and those by assessing commissioners composed of farmers. Of course weights of harvested crops assessed by agents of state were far larger.
Excessive tax collection by state brought about enormous complaints by farmers. State had to suppress those complaints. Therefore troubles between state and farmers had a tendency to increase. Facts mentioned above display a dynamic side in North Korea regarded as uniform and oppressive system since liberation. Ultimately this study intends to catch dynamic sides in North Korea through examination on the system of agricultural tax paid in kind.
Tax-in-kind system revealed serious problems at collection processes because farmers can pay variously according to quality and quantity of kind. This respect implies that farmers can do harm to state. On the other hand assessments of tax-in-kind executed before harvests were utilized with a means of excessive tax collection. The method of assessment calculating weights of harvested crops per pyong(坪) before harvests contained serious defect in accuracy. Therefore there was serious difference between weights of harvested crops per pyong assessed by agents of state and those by assessing commissioners composed of farmers. Of course weights of harvested crops assessed by agents of state were far larger.
Excessive tax collection by state brought about enormous complaints by farmers. State had to suppress those complaints. Therefore troubles between state and farmers had a tendency to increase. Facts mentioned above display a dynamic side in North Korea regarded as uniform and oppressive system since liberation. Ultimately this study intends to catch dynamic sides in North Korea through examination on the system of agricultural tax paid in kind.
목차
머리말
1. “이상적 세제”의 등장
2. 농민들의 이기적 현물 납부방식과 국가의 대응
3. 판정오차를 이용한 국가의 과당징수
4. 현물세 징수를 둘러싼 다층적 수준의 갈등과 당조직 주도의 해결방식
맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (7)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
부동산 세제의 국제 비교와 시사점
유라시아연구
2019 .01
-
한국의 근대 조세 100년사와 국가, 민주화, 조세 공평의 과제
역사비평
2011 .02
-
해방 직후 북한의 재정·금융 상황과 임시 재정 대책
사학연구
2020 .06
-
1950년대 후반 세제개혁과 미국 조세고문단의 활동
역사와현실
2017 .09
-
韓國과 日本의 納稅倫理意識에 관한 比較硏究 : 大學生을 中心으로
일어일문학
2006 .05
-
Analysis on Tax Benefits in China ― The Impact of Tax Benefits Reducing Disparity across Industries and Regions in China
중국학
2016 .01
-
일제시기 ‘유흥세’ 운영의 추이와 특징
한국사연구
2019 .12
-
Global Tax Policy Developments Related to Highly Digitalized Businesses
외국학연구
2018 .01
-
중국문화와 증치세법 연구
중국문화연구
2009 .12
-
조세윤리의식에 관한 국제간 비교--한국·중국·일본 대학생을 중심으로
중국학
2011 .01
-
1894~1910년 海稅制度의 변화와 稅制 정비의 방향
한국사연구
2005 .03
-
고려 후기 漕運制의 운영과 변화
동방학지
2010 .01
-
백제 5方制 하의 수취체제
역사학보
2005 .03
-
『계암일록』을 통해 본 17세기 전반 예안현의 부세 상황
한국사학보
2013 .11
-
Globalization and the Quality of Life of Korean Farmers
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2004 .03
-
해방을 찾아가는 농민
역사비평
2010 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-911-002248252