메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
趙成山 (고려대학교)
저널정보
역사학회 역사학보 歷史學報 第202輯
발행연도
2009.6
수록면
49 - 90 (42page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The intelligent in the latter half of Choseon Dynasty put forth Sino-Centralism, but there was a little difference in its contents and application. Noron proposed culture of Song Dynasty as standard for Sino-Centralism with a slogan of Dae-myeong-eui-ri(對明義理). That was the reason why they hardly paid attention to ancient history largely and failed to evade from attitude to narration of history depicted by previous historians in a large scale. They emphasized relation to the culture of Song Dynasty represented by the doctrines of Chu-tz suggesting that Choseon would be able to maintain its subjectivity of its culture. On the other hand, Saran paid more attention to culture of Gija Choseon that had been inherited from long time ago and proposed it as standard for Sino-Centralism. In that way, they tried to internalize Sino-Centralism of ancient times inherited ever since Gija Choseon Era into our history. As a result of that, they happened to pay close attention to ancient history.
This kind of research on ancient history originally came from unique interpretation of Sino-Centralism by Soron, however it caused a certain result unintentionally that excelled Sino-Centralism. At the beginning, they tried to complete and refine Sino-Centralism that they interpreted on their own, however they came to start finding national subjectivity beyond Sino-Centralism inside of them without notice. That is because their study on ancient history might have structural similarity in common with nationalism in which the nation's culture is respected if China is made shown. This situation has hardly nothing to do with the reason that Shin, Chae-ho newly discover and highly praise Ryu, Deuk-gong Lee, Jong-hwi. The history of medieval Sino-Centralism encountered that of modem nationalism by accident through this flow of course.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 明淸交替 이후 中華 이해의 향방
Ⅲ. 箕子 중심의 中華主義
Ⅳ. 古代史 연구와 소론계 학풍
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (90)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-911-002971432