지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (8)
2010
2007
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article explores the relationship between Chinese dynasties and Yunnan region in the 6th century. The focus of this study is the nature of an regional state established in Ningzhou(寧州) by a powerful indigenous clan called Cuan(?) family and their relations with Chinese dynasties. Since AD 549, Cuan Zan(?瓚), an autochthon of Ningzhou, had gained control over the barbarian clans in Ningzhou and named himself king, Afterwards Cuan Zan and his descendents ruled Yunnan for over fifty years, Although Cuan Zan's "occupation" of Ningzhou constituted only a part of the entire period of Cuan clan's hegemony in Yunnan, which had lasted from the mid-fourth century to the mid-seventh century, it brought about important changes in the relationship between the Chinese dynasties and Yunnan.
One of the most important changes incurred by the "occupation" was that the Chinese dynasties began to officially recognize the existence of a unified political power in Yunnan. The imperial government of Northern Zhou Dynasty, which had already occupied nearby region of Sichuan, granted the chief of Cuan clan the title of prefectural governor(刺史) of Southern Ningzhou(南寧州). This meant that the Cuan family received a "diplomatic recognition" from a Chinese dynasty for the first time. Until the first half of the sixth century, Southern Dynasties of China intentionally ignored the existence of independent powers in Yunnan. And continued to appoint Chinese to the post of the prefectural governor of Ningzhou, even though their administrative power could not reach the area most of the time. Most of these prefectural governors were the staffs of the commander generals of the Southern Dynasties, who had simultaneous appointment as the prefectural governor of Yizhou(益州) or of Jingzhou(荊州).
In spite of setting up local administrative organization like Ningzhou or Southern Ningzhou, however, Chinese powers did not have real control over Yunnan during this time. Despite its formal subjection to Chinese, Cuan family exercised and maintained independent political power over the people of Yunnan. In other words, the Cuan family had continued to exist as an independent state(國) in traditional Chinese sens. This was the reason why the contemporary Chinese historical records called the Cuan power "Xicuan-state(西?國)".
After receiving the tide of prefectural governor of Southern Ningzhou, chiefs of the Cuan family sent tribute envoys to emperors of Northern Zhou and Sui Dynasties. The Cuan family partidpated in the "Chinese World oder" through the exchange of Chinese tide and tribute envoys so to speak, and this mode of interactions between Cuan family and Chinese dynasties was similar to "Jmifuzhou(羈?府州) system" which was formally institutionalized later under Tang Dynasty from the 7th and the 10th centuries. The Cuan regime in Yunnan was disintegrated, when Sui Dynasty conquered the region by military forces later. However, it did not mean that the Xicuan state fell under the direct rule of Chinese power. The Emperor Wendi of the Sui Dynasty killed Cuan Wan(?翫), who had came to Sui capital to surrender to him, but the emperor eventually gave up the direct rule over Yunnan. Later, the first emperor of Tang Dynasty took a more conciliatory policy toward Cuan family, and sent Cuan Wan's son home with Can Wan's body; afterward, the Tang established several 'Jimizhou(羈?州)' in the Xicuan territory.
One of the most important changes incurred by the "occupation" was that the Chinese dynasties began to officially recognize the existence of a unified political power in Yunnan. The imperial government of Northern Zhou Dynasty, which had already occupied nearby region of Sichuan, granted the chief of Cuan clan the title of prefectural governor(刺史) of Southern Ningzhou(南寧州). This meant that the Cuan family received a "diplomatic recognition" from a Chinese dynasty for the first time. Until the first half of the sixth century, Southern Dynasties of China intentionally ignored the existence of independent powers in Yunnan. And continued to appoint Chinese to the post of the prefectural governor of Ningzhou, even though their administrative power could not reach the area most of the time. Most of these prefectural governors were the staffs of the commander generals of the Southern Dynasties, who had simultaneous appointment as the prefectural governor of Yizhou(益州) or of Jingzhou(荊州).
In spite of setting up local administrative organization like Ningzhou or Southern Ningzhou, however, Chinese powers did not have real control over Yunnan during this time. Despite its formal subjection to Chinese, Cuan family exercised and maintained independent political power over the people of Yunnan. In other words, the Cuan family had continued to exist as an independent state(國) in traditional Chinese sens. This was the reason why the contemporary Chinese historical records called the Cuan power "Xicuan-state(西?國)".
After receiving the tide of prefectural governor of Southern Ningzhou, chiefs of the Cuan family sent tribute envoys to emperors of Northern Zhou and Sui Dynasties. The Cuan family partidpated in the "Chinese World oder" through the exchange of Chinese tide and tribute envoys so to speak, and this mode of interactions between Cuan family and Chinese dynasties was similar to "Jmifuzhou(羈?府州) system" which was formally institutionalized later under Tang Dynasty from the 7th and the 10th centuries. The Cuan regime in Yunnan was disintegrated, when Sui Dynasty conquered the region by military forces later. However, it did not mean that the Xicuan state fell under the direct rule of Chinese power. The Emperor Wendi of the Sui Dynasty killed Cuan Wan(?翫), who had came to Sui capital to surrender to him, but the emperor eventually gave up the direct rule over Yunnan. Later, the first emperor of Tang Dynasty took a more conciliatory policy toward Cuan family, and sent Cuan Wan's son home with Can Wan's body; afterward, the Tang established several 'Jimizhou(羈?州)' in the Xicuan territory.
목차
Ⅰ. 서
Ⅱ. 南寧夷 ?瓚의 ‘竊據’와 ‘西?’
Ⅲ. 梁代의 寧州 지배
Ⅳ. 北周의 ‘西南’ 지역 경략과 南寧州
Ⅴ. 隋代의 ‘西?’ 경략과 南寧州
Ⅵ. 결
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
중국 학계의 ‘兩爨碑’ 연구 -돌에 새겨진 ‘爨氏’의 기억과 운남사-
중국사연구
2020 .01
-
「爨龍顔碑」를 통해 본 5세기 雲南 ‘西爨’ 세력의 성격
중국고중세사연구
2007 .08
-
‘爨蠻’의 출현과 구성 : ‘西爨白蠻’과 ‘東爨烏蠻’의 구분 문제
중국고중세사연구
2010 .02
-
杭州龍華寺供奉傅翕靈骨舍利考
동아인문학
2018 .06
-
箕子전승의 형성과 단군 신화에의 편입 과정
한국사학보
2016 .11
-
일본(日本) 천황가(天皇家)의 발상지(發祥地)와 소위 천손(天孫)이 내려간 남구주(南九州)의 한국(『韓國』)에 대하여
국어국문학
2018 .12
-
칠성과 부군(府君) 신앙, 뱀 신앙
비교민속학
2015 .12
-
唐代 ‘南中’ 지역과 ‘西爨’ : 「爨守忠墓誌」의 해석을 중심으로
동양사학연구
2010 .03
-
中國園林의 歷史的 變遷에 관하여(Ⅱ)
중국문학
2002 .01
-
唐代 邊境地域의 藩鎭과 對外關係 - 東北邊境地域에서 邊境政策의 變化와 관련하여 -
중국사연구
2011 .01
-
연행로의 지리(地理)와 심적(心跡) -산해관(山海關)～통주(通州) 구간
국문학연구
2017 .01
-
책봉호 수수(授受)를 통해 본 수ㆍ당의 동방정책과 삼국의 대응
역사와현실
2006 .09
-
隋代 摩崖造像에 대한 硏究 - 東部地域을 中心으로 -
역사와경계
2004 .03
-
隋代의 文學 作品 속에 보이는 高句麗 -｢無向遼東浪死歌｣를 중심으로-
동방한문학
2015 .01
-
唐代 異民族 管理方式의 다양성 및 그 변용 : 羈縻府州 제도를 중심으로
동양사학연구
2018 .06
-
발해사의 귀속 문제와 唐代의 羈縻府州 제도
동북아역사논총
2006 .04
-
隋唐法律文化散论
중국사연구
2014 .01
-
唐 前期 北方 羈縻府州의 設置와 變化
동양사학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2013 .05
-
唐詩 속 漢武帝 형상에 반영된 皇帝에 대한 비판적 인식
중국어문학논집
2015 .12
-
隋唐시기 高句麗 遠征과 儀禮
역사와 담론
2012 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-911-002971407