지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In the times of the Great Advance Movement, Debating on the speed of economic development within the party came about. The discussion spread into all societies which divided into two camps: those who supported 'against rash advance' focusing on objective, stable and gradual development and those who upheld 'rash advance' emphasizing rapid development. While the former could be said as 'experts' the latter as 'reds'.
Representing 'great advance' Mao was strongly convinced that it was an accurate way to build Chinese coloured socialism to mobilize the masses and engage in class struggle using the experience of the victory of revolution. He who had accustomed to wars could not recognize the fact that revolution was one thing and building another. His solution was to eliminating social and local inequality through mass movement, incessant revolution, decentralization, at the same time to debilitate bureaucrats and technocrats who has dominated the masses. His logic starting from political preference over productivity made him to place too much confidence in subjective mass power which, he believed, would result reversal of product relation and in turn it would bring high productivity.
Meanwhile, Zou representing for the antagonists who labeled it as 'rash advance' criticized Mao's view of giving more importance on reversal of product relation than productivity, preferring politics which was a part of superstructure, and underlining human subjectivity as contradicting to historical materialism defining 'productivity determines product relation and economic infrastructure determines political superstructure. ' Those who opposed rash step forward searched for orderly development on its own merits and did not believe concurrent development which oriented toward equality. They preferred centralized state management relying on law and institution, bureaucrats and experts rather depending on subjective will power of human.
The difference between 'against rash advance' and 'rash advance' was manifested itself in all the matters of Chinese society ranging from the speed of economic development and perception on human ability to agricultural and industrial policies and attitude toward Western technology. Anyhow the atmosphere of 'rash advance' prevailed and had a chance to materialize as mass movement.
Representing 'great advance' Mao was strongly convinced that it was an accurate way to build Chinese coloured socialism to mobilize the masses and engage in class struggle using the experience of the victory of revolution. He who had accustomed to wars could not recognize the fact that revolution was one thing and building another. His solution was to eliminating social and local inequality through mass movement, incessant revolution, decentralization, at the same time to debilitate bureaucrats and technocrats who has dominated the masses. His logic starting from political preference over productivity made him to place too much confidence in subjective mass power which, he believed, would result reversal of product relation and in turn it would bring high productivity.
Meanwhile, Zou representing for the antagonists who labeled it as 'rash advance' criticized Mao's view of giving more importance on reversal of product relation than productivity, preferring politics which was a part of superstructure, and underlining human subjectivity as contradicting to historical materialism defining 'productivity determines product relation and economic infrastructure determines political superstructure. ' Those who opposed rash step forward searched for orderly development on its own merits and did not believe concurrent development which oriented toward equality. They preferred centralized state management relying on law and institution, bureaucrats and experts rather depending on subjective will power of human.
The difference between 'against rash advance' and 'rash advance' was manifested itself in all the matters of Chinese society ranging from the speed of economic development and perception on human ability to agricultural and industrial policies and attitude toward Western technology. Anyhow the atmosphere of 'rash advance' prevailed and had a chance to materialize as mass movement.
목차
Ⅰ. 序論
Ⅱ. 大躍進運動의 基礎知識
Ⅲ. 大躍進運動의 前兆: 經濟建設速度 論爭의 推移
Ⅳ. 大躍進運動을 둘러싼 論爭
Ⅴ. 結論: 大躍進運動 前後 ‘紅‘ㆍ‘專‘ 拮抗의 本質
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
L2 한국어 말하기 유창성 평가의 신뢰도 검증 : 다국면 라쉬 모형 활용
언어학 연구
2017 .10
-
래시가드 디자인 커스터마이징 서비스 이용에 영향을 미치는 소비자의 추구혜택과 지각된 위험
복식문화연구
2018 .01
-
수요자 중심 고급중국어 교재 개발 방향 연구
중국문화연구
2018 .08
-
서양의 ‘새로운 사회 운동’의 역사
역사학보
2008 .12
-
Economic Development in Korea
Korea Journal
1966 .08
-
韓國의 冷戰文化 形成과 文化大革命 : 대중 언론매체와 학계의 문화대혁명 인식에 대한 분석을 통하여
중국근현대사연구
2010 .12
-
사전의료의향서에 대한 기독교적 견해 고찰
신학과 목회
2012 .05
-
마오의 이미지 변화를 통해 본 중국 대중의 심상지리
중국문화연구
2016 .08
-
March 1st Movement and its impact on Chinese May 4th Revolution ②
Korea Journal
1971 .02
-
March 1st Movement and its Impact on Chinese May 4th Revolution
Korea Journal
1971 .01
-
프랑스 68운동과 한국 ‘촛불항쟁’ 이후의 민주주의
역사비평
2018 .05
-
중국 문화대혁명 시기의 反전통과 전통
역사학보
2013 .06
-
G2시대의 중국 사회주의 : 역사적 관점에서 본 중국의 개혁개방
역사비평
2014 .02
-
668년 신라군 선발대의 진군로와 그 의미
대구사학
2018 .01
-
기업의 생산성과 계측관련에 대한 고찰 - 일본 사례를 중심으로 -
일어일문학
2019 .05
-
장면 정권의 경제정책 구상과 경제개발5개년계획
한국사연구
2017 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-911-002858370