지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Achieved through input expansion rather than productivity increase. Therefore, he argues that the economy of East Asia is not a sustainable growth system.
Production improvements generally refer to labor productivity. However, as there are units to labor productivity, it is clear and easy to understand but it only uses the input elements of labor and capital so there may be limitations to productivity measurements in a complex industrial society like the one we have today. Because of this, interest in TFP concepts is increasing.
According to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and surveys of The Conference Board, the productivity increase rates of major countries have been rapidly decreasing since the early 2000s. The productivity of America, which had increased an annual average of 2.5% during the years of 1995 to 2005 showed an increase rate of less than a mere 1.0% for 10 years since 2005 and the productivity increase rate of Germany also fell from 1.7% to 0.7%. The productivity increase rate of Japan also decreased greatly from 1.8% to 0.8%. Theoretically, for a country’s economy to grow, resources such as labor and capital must be input more or productivity must be increased. However, great results are not being seen even when resources of employment are being input. Conclusively, if productivity cannot be increased even if many people work, then economic growth cannot be achieved as expected. While productivity is not everything, it does have an important role in economic growth or wage increases in the long-term.
In the case of Japan, according to The Conference Board, the labor productivity per hour in 2016 was 44.9 dollars, making it 23rd among 63 countries so it has not shown improvement in the past 20 years. Japan has had high levels of factory productivity for the past twenty years but its overall productivity appears to be horrible. In particular, their overall national productivity is at a low level when the service field is included. High levels of productivity are even more important for the economic growth and living standard improvements of Japan, in which the population is decreasing. As the growth momentum of Japan’s economy is weakening due to a decrease in the productive population following low birth rates and aging, labor productivity improvements are the goal of their national economic policies for the resolution of this problem.
Production improvements generally refer to labor productivity. However, as there are units to labor productivity, it is clear and easy to understand but it only uses the input elements of labor and capital so there may be limitations to productivity measurements in a complex industrial society like the one we have today. Because of this, interest in TFP concepts is increasing.
According to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and surveys of The Conference Board, the productivity increase rates of major countries have been rapidly decreasing since the early 2000s. The productivity of America, which had increased an annual average of 2.5% during the years of 1995 to 2005 showed an increase rate of less than a mere 1.0% for 10 years since 2005 and the productivity increase rate of Germany also fell from 1.7% to 0.7%. The productivity increase rate of Japan also decreased greatly from 1.8% to 0.8%. Theoretically, for a country’s economy to grow, resources such as labor and capital must be input more or productivity must be increased. However, great results are not being seen even when resources of employment are being input. Conclusively, if productivity cannot be increased even if many people work, then economic growth cannot be achieved as expected. While productivity is not everything, it does have an important role in economic growth or wage increases in the long-term.
In the case of Japan, according to The Conference Board, the labor productivity per hour in 2016 was 44.9 dollars, making it 23rd among 63 countries so it has not shown improvement in the past 20 years. Japan has had high levels of factory productivity for the past twenty years but its overall productivity appears to be horrible. In particular, their overall national productivity is at a low level when the service field is included. High levels of productivity are even more important for the economic growth and living standard improvements of Japan, in which the population is decreasing. As the growth momentum of Japan’s economy is weakening due to a decrease in the productive population following low birth rates and aging, labor productivity improvements are the goal of their national economic policies for the resolution of this problem.
목차
Abstract
1. 서론
2. 생산성 개념의 이해
3. 생산성과 계측문제
4. 생산성 향상에 대한 고찰
5. 일본의 생산성과 정책전환
6. 결론
참고문헌
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (6)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
산업구조변화가 고용 및 생산에 미치는 영향
유라시아연구
2021 .09
-
한자어 접미사 생산성의 계량화 방안 연구 - 유형 빈도를 중심으로
한말연구
2023 .04
-
영한 포스트에디팅 생산성에 대한 고찰- 시간적 노력을 중심으로
통번역학연구
2021 .01
-
임금상승의 노동생산성 효과 및 고용 효과: 20인 이하 기업을 중심으로
인문사회과학연구
2018 .01
-
복합어의 구조와 생산성에 대한 일한비교연구 : N-VN型복합명사를 중심으로
일어일문학
2016 .05
-
기술불안감과 지각된 생산성이 셀프서비스테크놀로지에 대한 태도에 미치는 영향 - 상호작용욕구의 조절효과를 중심으로 -
복식문화연구
2020 .01
-
중국 하이테크산업의 R&D투자 효율성 및 생산성 분석
유라시아연구
2019 .01
-
러시아 극동지역의 산업구조 분석: 특화계수와 노동생산성 변화를 중심으로
슬라브硏究
2019 .01
-
글로벌 금융위기 이후의 체코 경제와 정책 제언
동유럽발칸연구
2018 .01
-
중부권 전문대학 운영의 상대적 효율성 분석과 생산성 변화 추이
인문사회과학연구
2023 .08
-
중국의 경제성장 패러다임 전환과 노동정책의 변화
중국지식네트워크
2018 .01
-
어미의 통사론, 그 반성과 모색
우리말연구
2015 .01
-
엘리자베스 비숍의 「대기실에서」에 나타나는 기하 추상과 바이오모픽 추상 연구
영어영문학연구
2022 .03
-
우크라이나 전쟁 이후 러시아 전시경제의 허와 실: 주요 경제 리스크를 중심으로
슬라브학보
2025 .03
-
체제전환국의 경제자유화가 경제성장에 미친 영향에 대한 분석 : 중동부유럽과 유라시아 국가를 중심으로
슬라브학보
2015 .06
-
COVID-19 환경에서 업무몰입과 뉴미디어 이용 태도가 재택근무 업무 생산성에 미치는 영향
인문사회과학연구
2022 .12
-
대일 경제정책의 사회적 형성 : 무역 불균형과 한국과 대만의 정책대응 비교
동아연구
2016 .02
-
Crisis of Self-Confidence: Is the Miracle on the Han River Over?
Situations: Cultural Studies in the Asian Context
2018 .01
-
언론을 통해 본 한일협정 인식 50년
역사비평
2015 .05
-
최근 리투아니아 경제 상황과 정책 제언
동유럽발칸연구
2019 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-830-000664581