메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
역사학회 역사학보 歷史學報 第182輯
발행연도
2004.6
수록면
263 - 293 (31page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Francoism is maintained through a dialectic mechanism of interaction between coercion and consent (or consensus). Through a historiographic overview of Francoism, we have come to know that coercion and consent, which are key to understanding the regime, have not yet been thoroughly studied. In particular, the dimension of consent or consensus that aids in understanding the relation between Francoism and the masses is only beginning to be studied.
This analyzes mass politics with which the Franco regime tried to secure the support of the people by either soliciting their passive consent or active consensus; when the regime failed to either, it tried to make the masses indifferent to politics.
To more deeply understand the mass politics of Francoism, analysis of the following four subjects is required.
The first is the myths associated with the Franco regime, which must have exercised a greater influence on daily life than most people realize. The myth of Franco 'Caudillo' is a typical example. Franco, who was a 'Caudillo of Victory' who was victorious in the Civil War, was rediscovered as a 'Caudillo of Peace.' It goes without saying that this kind of myth was used to either legitimize the regime or Nuevo Estado. The second is National Catholicism, which appears to have served as a kind of political religion. It is well known that political religion held consolidate regimes under Italian fascism and German nazism. The third is the role of education. The myths mentioned exerted more permanent force through the systematic guidance and education given in primary and secondary schools. The fourth is cultural policy, which operated in areas such as films, football, bullfights, literatura de quiosco, radio, television, etc.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 프랑코 체제의 성격에 관한 논쟁
Ⅲ. 강제와 억압의 차원
Ⅳ. 동의 내지 합의의 차원
Ⅴ. 결론
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-911-002858401