지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The "Chinese Origin" theorem was originated in the end Ming when Seohak(西學) was actively transmitted to China. It insisted that Western science was actually the result of Chinese science that was passed on to the Western world. The theorem was systemized by the Chinese scholar Mei Wending(梅文鼎). Since it was adopted as a logic to receive the Western mechanical first by Seo Myong-Ung(徐命膺) in the late 18th century, the "Chinese Origin" theorem played important roles in Chosun too until the end of 19th century, concerning the reception of Sohak. While it was used as a logic to receive Seohak in China, it had another role to work as a logic against Seohak in Chosun. Regardless this difference, however, the "Chinese Origin" theorem was basically adopted as a logic to receive Western science and technology.
But on the whole, the theorem was a far-fetched opinion and had to receive lots of criticism in its beginning. Among the criticism, though, it did play a positive role to give one the chance to look back on one's own tradition before receiving Western science and thus to prepare the public for the foreignness of the foreign civilization. The theorem was usually used as a logic in favor of reception of Western civilization until the middle 19th century when Chosun opened its ports to world powers. Since then it started to lose its base in the country. One of the few traces left of it was an argument made by Kim Yun-Sik(金允植) saying that the knowledge of the previous king and the new Western knowledge were based on the same principle. It was only natural that the persuasive power of the "Chinese Origin" theorem grew weaker as more and more of Western science was understood in Chosun. The rate of its losing power was rather quick compared to the situation of China of the times where the theorem enjoyed its prosperity. The different trend of Chosun to that of China seems to have been related to the way theorists of combining the Eastern ways of morality and the Western mechanical spared little philosophical consideration of the concept of ToGi(道器) and thus had little chance to realize the logical inconsistency of the theorem of combining the Eastern ways of morality and the Western mechanical techniques(東道西器論). As a result, the "Chinese Origin" theorem declined But it's influence wasn't lost completely.
But on the whole, the theorem was a far-fetched opinion and had to receive lots of criticism in its beginning. Among the criticism, though, it did play a positive role to give one the chance to look back on one's own tradition before receiving Western science and thus to prepare the public for the foreignness of the foreign civilization. The theorem was usually used as a logic in favor of reception of Western civilization until the middle 19th century when Chosun opened its ports to world powers. Since then it started to lose its base in the country. One of the few traces left of it was an argument made by Kim Yun-Sik(金允植) saying that the knowledge of the previous king and the new Western knowledge were based on the same principle. It was only natural that the persuasive power of the "Chinese Origin" theorem grew weaker as more and more of Western science was understood in Chosun. The rate of its losing power was rather quick compared to the situation of China of the times where the theorem enjoyed its prosperity. The different trend of Chosun to that of China seems to have been related to the way theorists of combining the Eastern ways of morality and the Western mechanical spared little philosophical consideration of the concept of ToGi(道器) and thus had little chance to realize the logical inconsistency of the theorem of combining the Eastern ways of morality and the Western mechanical techniques(東道西器論). As a result, the "Chinese Origin" theorem declined But it's influence wasn't lost completely.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 18세기 후반 ‘중국원류설‘의 수용
Ⅲ. 19세기 초반 ‘중국원류설‘의 전개
Ⅳ. 19세기 중반의 대외위기인식과 ‘중국원류설‘
Ⅴ. 재항기 동도서기론과 ‘중국원류설‘
Ⅵ. 맺음말
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Introduction of Western Science in Korea, 1876-1910
Korea Journal
1981 .05
-
이방의 과학과 고전적 전통-17세기 서구 과학에 대한 중국적 이해와 그 변천
동양철학
2004 .01
-
Some Results of the Theorem of S. Chowla
코기토
1975 .12
-
Western Science in Yi Korea
Korea Journal
1964 .11
-
A Comparison of Chinese and Western Calligraphy
Korea Journal
1972 .11
-
16～17세기 朝鮮 知識人의 西洋 이해와 世界觀의 변화
동방학지
2003 .01
-
19세기 한국의 국제법 수용과 중국과의 전통적 관계 청산을 위한 투쟁
역사학보
2004 .03
-
The Reception of Western Law in Korea
Korea Journal
1980 .05
-
近代東アジアの言語交渉による漢語の意味変化
언어사실과 관점
2015 .01
-
조선서학의 전개와 과제
신학과 철학
2012 .01
-
동도서기론의 정치적 역할과 변화
역사와현실
2006 .06
-
18～19세기 西學中源論의 전개와 그 함의 -西學에 대한 조선학자들의 대응논리-
漢文古典硏究
2020 .01
-
The Reception and Influence of Western Ethics
Korea Journal
1999 .03
-
경계를 넘는 과학 : 국내 서양과학사 연구의 최근 동향들
역사학보
2012 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-911-002860105