지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
1. The founding myths of Goguryeo are related in ancient Korean texts, with slight variations, including the Gwanggaetostele, the SamgukSagi, the SamgukYusa, and the Dongmyeong Wangpyeon of the DonggukIsanggukjip (by YiGyu-bo). We, Korean have faced “Haemosu” and “Haeburu” in King “Chumong” story of “Goguryeo” in SamgukSagi. According to the SamgukYusa, Haemosu is the king of heaven, riding in achariot of five dragons, arriving at Holsenggolseong to establish Bukbuyeo (NorthBuyeo). According to another story of the SamgukYusa, “Haeburu”, [who is the prince of the Heaven King “Haemosu” of Bukbuyeo (North Buyeo),] is first the King of DongBuyeo (East Buyeo). According to the SamgukSagi, Haeburu, by order of the King of UpHeaven (上帝), after moving to the new capital of Gasepwon, become the new founder King of Dongbuyeo (East Buyeo), and then [another] King “Haemosu” [=King Dongmyeng as second step among twice foundation of Jolbon Buyeo] come the old capital of BukBuyeo (North Buyeo). According to the SamgukSagi, Chumong is described as the son of “Haemosu”(解慕漱：the prince of heaven) and Yuhwa (柳花：daughter of the river god Habaek (河伯)) of Ubalsu (優渤水). Until now, we have believed that there was only one Haemosu in “Goguryeo” foundation history of the SamgukSagi. After comparing SamgukSagi with SamgukYusa, I find that there are really three king Haemosus i.e. the first king “Haemosu” of North Buyeo , the second king “Haemosu” of coming the former Capital city of Bukbuyeo (North Buyeo), and the third king “Haemosu” of Ubalsu. Until now, we have believed that there are only one Dongmyeong in Goguryeo foundation history in with SamgukYusa. But I discriminate Dongmyeong of Jolbon Buyeo from Dongmyeong of Goguryeo, after comparing SamgukYusa with Buyeoin History of the Later Han (simplified Chinese: 后??; traditional Chinese: 後漢書; pinyin: houhansh?; Wade-Giles: Hou Han Shu) & Records of Three Kingdoms (simplified Chinese: 三?志; traditional Chinese: 三國志; pinyin: S?nguo Zhi). I identify Haemosu of coming former Capital city of North Buyeo as Dongmyeong of Jolbon Buyeo, after comparing SamgukSagi with SamgukYusa. Until now, we have believed that there was only one one Haeburu in “Goguryeo” history of SamgukSagi. Now I recognize at least three Haeburus among one Haeburu of East Buyeo, another Haeburu of the same as King Youngpumli of Bukbuyeo (North Buyeo), the third Haeburu of one King both of Bukbuyeo (North Buyeo) and ancestor of King Biru of Baekje in both SamgukSagi and SamgukYusa. I realized that King “Haeburu” of BukBuyeo (North Buyeo) and DongBuyeo (East Buyeo) was not one personal King name, but new title name of King. Then I conclude that Haemosu, Dongmyeong, and Haeburu is not only the personal King name but also the title name of King. I realize that king “Chumong” of Goguryeo have called one personal name and same new title name of the King Chumong and another old title name of king Dongmyeong, and king “Dongmyeong” of Jolbon Buyeo have called one personal name and same new title name of king Dongmyeong and another old title name of king Haemosu. This is the topic both called new title name and old title names of the king. These are subjects of Korean Original Philosophy and history of ancient Korea.
2. There are two kinds of method between deflation and inflation interpretation of Korea history data. Comparing records of Gwanggaeto stele, the SamgukSagi, the SamgukYusa, and the DongmyeongWangpyeon of the DonggukIsanggukjip (by YiGyu-bo), after times flow, foundation histories of Bukbuyeo (North Buyeo), DongBuyeo (East Buyeo), Jolbon Buyeo, and Goguryeo reproduced on a reduced scale. After comparing articles “Buyeo” in History of the Later Han (simplified Chinese: 后??; traditional Chinese: 後漢書; pinyin: houhansh?; Wade-Giles: Hou Han Shu) and Records of Three Kingdoms (simplified Chinese: 三?志; traditional Chinese: 三國志; pinyin: S?nguo Zhi) with SamgukYusai, king Dongmyeng founded JolbonBuyeo by two steps: first step in Jolbon and second step in former Capital city of Bukbuyeo (NorthBuyeo). After comparing articles “Goguryeo” in SamgukSagi with The stele of King Gwanggaeto, I know that king Chumong founded Goguryeo by three steps: i.e. the first founder as successor of Jolbon Buyeo after crossing Buyeo’s Great Omni River [in 58 B.C.] by the view of the Gwanggaeto stele; the second founder of arriving at Modungog in 40 B.C. by the view of another helper Gojastele; the third founder of arriving at Jolbon River as the western of former Capital city of Bukbuyeo (North Buyeo) in 37 B.C, by the view of the SamgukSagi in contemporary stories. But by changing sites and years of the first founding king of state from the first step founder as successor of Jolbon Buyeo after crossing Buyeo’s Great Omni River [in 58 B.C.] by the view of the Gwanggaetostele to the third step founder of arriving at Jolbon River closed western to former Capital city of Bukbuyeo (North Buyeo) in 37 B.C. by the view of the SamgukSagi of king Chumong, two step stories of the first founding King Dongmyeng of Jolbon Buyeo and [two step] stories of the first founding King Haemosu of Bukbuyeo (North Buyeo) happened to deflation interpretation, and sometimes was reduce to just King Chumong story of Goguryeo because of topic both called new title name and old titles names of the King. This is the deflation interpretation of dynasty’s lineages and Korean history of consciousness. Korean studying Literary Chinese known as hanmun in Korean, kanbun in Japanese and as Han V?n in Vietnamese (in all three cases spelt 漢文, “Han writing”), Chinese Ancient Philosophy and their history are blessings for Korean. After many years of studying Traditional Philosophy and Chinese history, record data of Korea history become a deflation interpretation. This deflation interpretation is harmful side effects.
3. Although modern philosopher and historian study of ancient Korean texts with slight variations, including the Gwanggaeto stele, the SamgukSagi, the SamgukYusa, and the DongmyeongWangpyeon of the DonggukIsanggukjip, no one can find three Haemosus, two Dongmyeongs, three Haeburus among histories of Bukbuyeo (North Buyeo), DongBuyeo (East Buyeo), JolbonBuyeo, and Goguryeo except one book, Hwandangogi. Only Hwandangogi distinguishes exactly four dynasties including (4-1) Bukbuyeogi, describing the six kings of Bukbuyeo (North Buyeo) the four kings of Bukbuyeo (North Buyeo); (4-2) Gasepwonbuyeogi, describing the three kings of DongBuyeo (East Buyeo), (5) the two kings of Jolbon Buyeo; and (6) Goguryeobongi, describing the impotent kings including king Chumong. Korean ancient history follows successors of (1) Hwanin - (2) Hwanwoong Giant - (3) Gojocheon (= “JocheonChendok” = “Gojocheon + Chendok” = “Gojocheon + Scythians”) - (4) BukBuyeo (North Buyeo) - (5) Jolbon Buyeo - (6) Goguryeo - (7) Balhae and Great Silla - (8) Goryeo - (9) Jocheon - (10) North and South Korea. We have called the title name of first governor of government “president” in (10) North and South Korea. We have called title names of the “king” for the Kings of states from (7) Balhae and Great Silla to (9) Jocheon. However, Silla times before calling the title name of king “king” of Great Silla, I interpret that Silla follow the topic both called new title name and old title names of the king such as [“Geoseogan(거서간)”-“Chachaung(차차웅)”-]“Isageum(이사금)”-“Maripgan(마립간)” during changing time from old title name to new title name of the same king in Silla, according to difference of the title name of the king between the SamgukSagi and the SamgukYusa. If fact, there is not just one personal King named “Dongmyeng”, one personal King named “Haemosu”, one personal King named “Buru”, but many Kings called the same title name of king “Dongmyeng”, many Kings called the same title name of king “Haemosu” and many Kings called the same title name of king “Buru” from Goguryeo to North Buyeo in Korea history.
I assume that there was not just one personal name for King “Dangun”, for King “Giant-Hwanung” and for King “Hwanin=the king of Heaven”, but that many Kings were called the same title name of kings “Dangun”, many Kings called the same title name of kings “Giant-Hwanung”, and many Kings called the same title name of kings “the king of Heaven=Hwanin” from (3) Dangun’s [Go]jocheon to (1) Hwanin’s state in Korea history. From my analysis of Hwandangogi, I realized that there are the topic both called new title name and old title names of the kings not as assumption but as histories from (1) Hwanin to (6) Goguyeo. For example, These are topics both called new title name and old title names of the kings such as: the topic both called “Chumong” and Dongmyeong of (6) Goguryeo; the topic both called “Dongmyeng” and Haemosu of (5) Jolbon Buyeo; the topic both called “Buliji” and Haemosu of Okjeo(4-1); the topic both called “Jin” and Haemosu of Jin state(=Pro Goguryeo); the topic both called “[persongod-]Haemosu” and Dangun (4) North Buyeo; the topic both called “Gisu(奇首)” or “Gija(奇子)” and Dangun of (3-3) Ye-Joseon; the topic both called “Buru” and Dangun of (3-2)Three [Go]jocheon; the topic both called “[persongod-] DangunWanggeom” and Giant-Hwanung of (3-1)Three Han [Go]jocheon; the topic both called “Dangun” and Wanggeom of (3) [Go]jocheon (= “JocheonChendok” = “Gojocheon + Chendok” = “Gojocheon + Scythians”); the topic both called “[persongod]-Wanggeom” and Giant-Hwanung of Giant-Hwanung states(2-1); the topic both called “Giant-Hwanung” and the King of Heaven[=Hwanin] of (2) Giant-hwanung state; the topic both called “Hwanin [that means the king of heaven]” or “the King of Heaven” of (1) Hwanin state. Until now, no one knew the topic both called new title name and old title names of the king except the author of one book, i.e. the author of Hwandangogi. We find the topic both called new title name and old title names of the king in the HwandanGogi comprised the four books such as: SamseongGi (two volumes), describing the 7kings called the title name of the king, “Hwannin (that means the King of Heavenin Korean origin term, The God)”, and the 18kings called the title name of the king “Hwanung”, or “Chenwang (that means the King of Heaven)”; DangunSegi, chronic led the history of Gojoseon with 47 generations both of Dangun rulers called the same title name of the king, “Dangun” included first Dangun called “personal god-Dangun Wanggeom” and some rulers called another title names of the king, “(Saek)Buru”, “Gisu”-“Gija”; BukbuyeoGi, describing the six kings of Bukbuyeo (NorthBuyeo) called the same title name of the king, the topic both called “Dongmyeng”, “Haemosu”, “Dangun” and “Chenwang”, and the topic both called “Haemosu”, “Dangun” and “Chenwang”, and the topic both called “Buliji” or “Jin”, and “personal god-Haemosu”, and the king of called “king Chumong”; TaebaekIlsa, describing the histories of Hwan-guk in cluded 7 kings called the title name of the king “Hwanin [= the king of Heaven]”, “the king of Heaven [= Hwanin]”, Baedalguk in cluded 18 kings called the title name of the king “Giant-Hwanung”, and another title name of small king “personal god-Wanggeom”; Samjoseon in cluded 35 kings called the title name of the king “king” of Mak[=Maek]-Joseon, 74(75) kings called the title name of the king “king” of Bun[=Ye]-Joseon, and 47 kings “Dangun”, “Chenwang (that means the King of Heaven)” inclusive of new Joseon founder called both personal name and the title name of the king “(Saek)Buru” of Jin-Joseon, Goguryeo included some kings called title name of the king, “Buliji”, “Jin”, “Wang [=that means common title name of kings in Korea]”, “Taewang [=title name of the king that means the Great King among kings]”, “A-hara”, Balhae included 14 kings called title name of the king “Hwangje [=that means common title name of Great kings in Chinese style]”, and Goryeo; also includes the text of Cheonbu-gyeong. According to Hwandangogi, King Haemosu founded of Bukbuyeo(North Buyeo) as two steps, including both of the first in the new Capital city of Bukbuyeo (North Buyeo), as he did with the former Capital city of Daebuyeo (Grea tBuyeo) which we recalled both the personal name and new title name of king “Haemosu”, and second in last Capital city (“Jangdanggyeong”) of Daebuyeo (Great Buyeo) which we recalled the old title name of the king “Dangun”, “Chenwangrang [‘Chenwang’ that means the king of Heaven, ‘Rang’ that means the young man]”. Most historians in South Korea, North Korea and Japan generally consider the HwandanGogi to have been created in recent times, because of the following three reasons: (1) Those are words from modern language. (for example, ‘男女平權; the equality of man and woman’, ‘父權; paternal rights’) (2) The route through which HwandanGogi was first published is not clear. (3) The contents in HwandanGogi are not realistic. (for example, the population, 180 million of Gojoseon 4,000 years, Several thousand kilometers of the nation in about 8000 BCE.) But at least the first reasons is wrong, because “男女平權” and “父權” is not ‘the equality of man and woman’ of modern ideas and ‘paternal rights’ of the axial ideas, but are right issues of the four group societies (Girl group, Boy group, Mother group, Father group) in Hwannin’s state. This group societies (Girl group, Boy group, Mother group, Father group) appeared two times both first three groups case in “?氏 (Girl group), 子氏 (Boy group), 姬氏 (Mother group)”, this line appears to be Sima’s opinion after Benji( 本紀) of the Five Emperors of The Records of the Grand Historian, and second four groups case “today current customs is: 中興部 called 母 Mother group, 長福部 called 父 Father group, 臨川部 called 子 Boy group, 加德部 called 女 Girl group, but we don’tknow the origin of that story today; 今俗 中興部爲母, 長福部爲父, 臨川部爲子, 加德部爲女 其實未詳)” of the SamgukYusa. If it is second reasons, I think so, and I am not certain in detail. If it is the third reasons, my opinion is simple. Please don’t forgot SanHaeGyeong, (simplified Chinese: 山海?; traditional Chinese: 山海經; pinyin: Sh?nh?i J?ng; Wade-Giles: Shan Hai Ching; literally “Collection of the Mountains and Seas”). If SanHaeGyeong of truth is possible, and then HwandanGogi of truth also possible. These reasons lead me to revaluate the HwandanGogi.
2. There are two kinds of method between deflation and inflation interpretation of Korea history data. Comparing records of Gwanggaeto stele, the SamgukSagi, the SamgukYusa, and the DongmyeongWangpyeon of the DonggukIsanggukjip (by YiGyu-bo), after times flow, foundation histories of Bukbuyeo (North Buyeo), DongBuyeo (East Buyeo), Jolbon Buyeo, and Goguryeo reproduced on a reduced scale. After comparing articles “Buyeo” in History of the Later Han (simplified Chinese: 后??; traditional Chinese: 後漢書; pinyin: houhansh?; Wade-Giles: Hou Han Shu) and Records of Three Kingdoms (simplified Chinese: 三?志; traditional Chinese: 三國志; pinyin: S?nguo Zhi) with SamgukYusai, king Dongmyeng founded JolbonBuyeo by two steps: first step in Jolbon and second step in former Capital city of Bukbuyeo (NorthBuyeo). After comparing articles “Goguryeo” in SamgukSagi with The stele of King Gwanggaeto, I know that king Chumong founded Goguryeo by three steps: i.e. the first founder as successor of Jolbon Buyeo after crossing Buyeo’s Great Omni River [in 58 B.C.] by the view of the Gwanggaeto stele; the second founder of arriving at Modungog in 40 B.C. by the view of another helper Gojastele; the third founder of arriving at Jolbon River as the western of former Capital city of Bukbuyeo (North Buyeo) in 37 B.C, by the view of the SamgukSagi in contemporary stories. But by changing sites and years of the first founding king of state from the first step founder as successor of Jolbon Buyeo after crossing Buyeo’s Great Omni River [in 58 B.C.] by the view of the Gwanggaetostele to the third step founder of arriving at Jolbon River closed western to former Capital city of Bukbuyeo (North Buyeo) in 37 B.C. by the view of the SamgukSagi of king Chumong, two step stories of the first founding King Dongmyeng of Jolbon Buyeo and [two step] stories of the first founding King Haemosu of Bukbuyeo (North Buyeo) happened to deflation interpretation, and sometimes was reduce to just King Chumong story of Goguryeo because of topic both called new title name and old titles names of the King. This is the deflation interpretation of dynasty’s lineages and Korean history of consciousness. Korean studying Literary Chinese known as hanmun in Korean, kanbun in Japanese and as Han V?n in Vietnamese (in all three cases spelt 漢文, “Han writing”), Chinese Ancient Philosophy and their history are blessings for Korean. After many years of studying Traditional Philosophy and Chinese history, record data of Korea history become a deflation interpretation. This deflation interpretation is harmful side effects.
3. Although modern philosopher and historian study of ancient Korean texts with slight variations, including the Gwanggaeto stele, the SamgukSagi, the SamgukYusa, and the DongmyeongWangpyeon of the DonggukIsanggukjip, no one can find three Haemosus, two Dongmyeongs, three Haeburus among histories of Bukbuyeo (North Buyeo), DongBuyeo (East Buyeo), JolbonBuyeo, and Goguryeo except one book, Hwandangogi. Only Hwandangogi distinguishes exactly four dynasties including (4-1) Bukbuyeogi, describing the six kings of Bukbuyeo (North Buyeo) the four kings of Bukbuyeo (North Buyeo); (4-2) Gasepwonbuyeogi, describing the three kings of DongBuyeo (East Buyeo), (5) the two kings of Jolbon Buyeo; and (6) Goguryeobongi, describing the impotent kings including king Chumong. Korean ancient history follows successors of (1) Hwanin - (2) Hwanwoong Giant - (3) Gojocheon (= “JocheonChendok” = “Gojocheon + Chendok” = “Gojocheon + Scythians”) - (4) BukBuyeo (North Buyeo) - (5) Jolbon Buyeo - (6) Goguryeo - (7) Balhae and Great Silla - (8) Goryeo - (9) Jocheon - (10) North and South Korea. We have called the title name of first governor of government “president” in (10) North and South Korea. We have called title names of the “king” for the Kings of states from (7) Balhae and Great Silla to (9) Jocheon. However, Silla times before calling the title name of king “king” of Great Silla, I interpret that Silla follow the topic both called new title name and old title names of the king such as [“Geoseogan(거서간)”-“Chachaung(차차웅)”-]“Isageum(이사금)”-“Maripgan(마립간)” during changing time from old title name to new title name of the same king in Silla, according to difference of the title name of the king between the SamgukSagi and the SamgukYusa. If fact, there is not just one personal King named “Dongmyeng”, one personal King named “Haemosu”, one personal King named “Buru”, but many Kings called the same title name of king “Dongmyeng”, many Kings called the same title name of king “Haemosu” and many Kings called the same title name of king “Buru” from Goguryeo to North Buyeo in Korea history.
I assume that there was not just one personal name for King “Dangun”, for King “Giant-Hwanung” and for King “Hwanin=the king of Heaven”, but that many Kings were called the same title name of kings “Dangun”, many Kings called the same title name of kings “Giant-Hwanung”, and many Kings called the same title name of kings “the king of Heaven=Hwanin” from (3) Dangun’s [Go]jocheon to (1) Hwanin’s state in Korea history. From my analysis of Hwandangogi, I realized that there are the topic both called new title name and old title names of the kings not as assumption but as histories from (1) Hwanin to (6) Goguyeo. For example, These are topics both called new title name and old title names of the kings such as: the topic both called “Chumong” and Dongmyeong of (6) Goguryeo; the topic both called “Dongmyeng” and Haemosu of (5) Jolbon Buyeo; the topic both called “Buliji” and Haemosu of Okjeo(4-1); the topic both called “Jin” and Haemosu of Jin state(=Pro Goguryeo); the topic both called “[persongod-]Haemosu” and Dangun (4) North Buyeo; the topic both called “Gisu(奇首)” or “Gija(奇子)” and Dangun of (3-3) Ye-Joseon; the topic both called “Buru” and Dangun of (3-2)Three [Go]jocheon; the topic both called “[persongod-] DangunWanggeom” and Giant-Hwanung of (3-1)Three Han [Go]jocheon; the topic both called “Dangun” and Wanggeom of (3) [Go]jocheon (= “JocheonChendok” = “Gojocheon + Chendok” = “Gojocheon + Scythians”); the topic both called “[persongod]-Wanggeom” and Giant-Hwanung of Giant-Hwanung states(2-1); the topic both called “Giant-Hwanung” and the King of Heaven[=Hwanin] of (2) Giant-hwanung state; the topic both called “Hwanin [that means the king of heaven]” or “the King of Heaven” of (1) Hwanin state. Until now, no one knew the topic both called new title name and old title names of the king except the author of one book, i.e. the author of Hwandangogi. We find the topic both called new title name and old title names of the king in the HwandanGogi comprised the four books such as: SamseongGi (two volumes), describing the 7kings called the title name of the king, “Hwannin (that means the King of Heavenin Korean origin term, The God)”, and the 18kings called the title name of the king “Hwanung”, or “Chenwang (that means the King of Heaven)”; DangunSegi, chronic led the history of Gojoseon with 47 generations both of Dangun rulers called the same title name of the king, “Dangun” included first Dangun called “personal god-Dangun Wanggeom” and some rulers called another title names of the king, “(Saek)Buru”, “Gisu”-“Gija”; BukbuyeoGi, describing the six kings of Bukbuyeo (NorthBuyeo) called the same title name of the king, the topic both called “Dongmyeng”, “Haemosu”, “Dangun” and “Chenwang”, and the topic both called “Haemosu”, “Dangun” and “Chenwang”, and the topic both called “Buliji” or “Jin”, and “personal god-Haemosu”, and the king of called “king Chumong”; TaebaekIlsa, describing the histories of Hwan-guk in cluded 7 kings called the title name of the king “Hwanin [= the king of Heaven]”, “the king of Heaven [= Hwanin]”, Baedalguk in cluded 18 kings called the title name of the king “Giant-Hwanung”, and another title name of small king “personal god-Wanggeom”; Samjoseon in cluded 35 kings called the title name of the king “king” of Mak[=Maek]-Joseon, 74(75) kings called the title name of the king “king” of Bun[=Ye]-Joseon, and 47 kings “Dangun”, “Chenwang (that means the King of Heaven)” inclusive of new Joseon founder called both personal name and the title name of the king “(Saek)Buru” of Jin-Joseon, Goguryeo included some kings called title name of the king, “Buliji”, “Jin”, “Wang [=that means common title name of kings in Korea]”, “Taewang [=title name of the king that means the Great King among kings]”, “A-hara”, Balhae included 14 kings called title name of the king “Hwangje [=that means common title name of Great kings in Chinese style]”, and Goryeo; also includes the text of Cheonbu-gyeong. According to Hwandangogi, King Haemosu founded of Bukbuyeo(North Buyeo) as two steps, including both of the first in the new Capital city of Bukbuyeo (North Buyeo), as he did with the former Capital city of Daebuyeo (Grea tBuyeo) which we recalled both the personal name and new title name of king “Haemosu”, and second in last Capital city (“Jangdanggyeong”) of Daebuyeo (Great Buyeo) which we recalled the old title name of the king “Dangun”, “Chenwangrang [‘Chenwang’ that means the king of Heaven, ‘Rang’ that means the young man]”. Most historians in South Korea, North Korea and Japan generally consider the HwandanGogi to have been created in recent times, because of the following three reasons: (1) Those are words from modern language. (for example, ‘男女平權; the equality of man and woman’, ‘父權; paternal rights’) (2) The route through which HwandanGogi was first published is not clear. (3) The contents in HwandanGogi are not realistic. (for example, the population, 180 million of Gojoseon 4,000 years, Several thousand kilometers of the nation in about 8000 BCE.) But at least the first reasons is wrong, because “男女平權” and “父權” is not ‘the equality of man and woman’ of modern ideas and ‘paternal rights’ of the axial ideas, but are right issues of the four group societies (Girl group, Boy group, Mother group, Father group) in Hwannin’s state. This group societies (Girl group, Boy group, Mother group, Father group) appeared two times both first three groups case in “?氏 (Girl group), 子氏 (Boy group), 姬氏 (Mother group)”, this line appears to be Sima’s opinion after Benji( 本紀) of the Five Emperors of The Records of the Grand Historian, and second four groups case “today current customs is: 中興部 called 母 Mother group, 長福部 called 父 Father group, 臨川部 called 子 Boy group, 加德部 called 女 Girl group, but we don’tknow the origin of that story today; 今俗 中興部爲母, 長福部爲父, 臨川部爲子, 加德部爲女 其實未詳)” of the SamgukYusa. If it is second reasons, I think so, and I am not certain in detail. If it is the third reasons, my opinion is simple. Please don’t forgot SanHaeGyeong, (simplified Chinese: 山海?; traditional Chinese: 山海經; pinyin: Sh?nh?i J?ng; Wade-Giles: Shan Hai Ching; literally “Collection of the Mountains and Seas”). If SanHaeGyeong of truth is possible, and then HwandanGogi of truth also possible. These reasons lead me to revaluate the HwandanGogi.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 고구려 건국계승계보 위축변천과정 : 「광개토왕비문」, 「고자묘비문」, 『삼국사기』 그리고 『환단고기』
Ⅲ. 졸본부여 계승계보 위축변천과정: 『삼국유사, 주림전』『후한서』『삼국지위서, 위략』
Ⅳ. 북부여 계승계보 위축변천과정 : 『삼국사기』, 『삼국유사, 고구려, 고려본기』, 동명왕편, 『제왕운기』 그리고 『환단고기』
Ⅴ. 스키타이족 계승계보 위축변천과정 : 『역사』, 『삼국사기』, 『삼국유사』 그리고 『산해경』 3기 조선천독
Ⅵ. 일제강점기의 근대역사학에서 고조선－북부여－고구려 계승계보에 대한 위축변천과정 해석파와 확장변천과정 해석파 전통
Ⅶ. 결론
【참고문헌】
【Abstract】
참고문헌 (4)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
고구려 생활문화사 연구론
역사와현실
2012 .03
-
≪삼국사기≫ 고구려본기의 전쟁 기사 검토
신라사학보
2013 .12
-
高句麗의 巡狩制
역사학보
1985 .06
-
The Native Origins of the Paekche Refugee Ye (禰) Family and the Background of Their Activities in the Tang Dynasty
International Journal of Korean History
2017 .08
-
3세기 후반~4세기 전반 고구려의 교통로와 지방통치조직 : 南道와 北道를 중심으로
한국사연구
1995 .12
-
廣開土好太王期 高句麗 南進의 性格
한국사연구
1979 .12
-
결식아동이 이용하는 도시락의 미생물 검사를 통한 위생 상태 비교·분석
Journal of Nutrition and Health
2014 .06
-
가정배달도시락 수혜 아동의 도시락 서비스 이용 실태와 평가
한국식품영양과학회지
2015 .06
-
초등학생의 주요 가공식품으로부터 섭취하는 당, 나트륨, 지방류 등의 노출실태 조사 연구
한국식품영양과학회지
2009 .01
-
남한 내 고구려 성곽의 구조와 성격
고구려발해연구
2010 .03
-
청소년의 학업성취도와 핵심역량 유형 분류 및 영향요인 검증
한국청소년연구
2018 .05
-
체육수업에서 교사의 배려와 학생의 정서조절 및 학습몰입의 관계
한국스포츠교육학회지
2016 .10
-
사회과 핵심역량 중심의 창의·인성교육 수업 자료 개발 : 공감적 활동에 기반한 문제해결형
사회과교육
2012 .09
-
뇌파 측정을 기반으로 한 실내 온도가 재실자의 주의집중에 미치는 영향
대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계
2012 .03
-
A Study on the Level of Awareness and the Current Performance Level of Self-directed Learning in Nursing Students
한국산학기술학회 논문지
2016 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
북방지역 種族의 繼承關係 검토 : 靺鞨 · 女眞 · 滿洲族을 중심으로
林相先
고구려발해연구
2014
.11
북연을 둘러싼 고구려의 정책과 국제질서인식 : 대북위, 대송관계를 중심으로
시노하라 히로카타
한국사학보
2009
.08
금(金)건국과 발해유민 : 중화인민공화국 학자들의 주장에 대한 토론
김위현
고구려발해연구
2007
.12
高句麗國號考 : 高句麗와 句麗 관계를 중심으로
朴眞爽
,
鄭求福
고구려발해연구
2005
.12
高句麗의 狩獵習俗과 遊牧民 : 1~2세기 鮮卑族과의 관계를 중심으로
徐榮敎
,
姜仙
고구려발해연구
2005
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-240-002735254