지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The frequent revision of Administrative appeal tells us that the system settles in success. The act was revised again on January 15,2010 which was partly revised on February 29,2008. The number of requested administrative appeal case was increased every year and its capable function as the previous process of the administrative litigation was in demand. The specific part of this revision is the regulation on special administrative appeal process which is separated over the individual acts. The revision shows its desire to take the special administrative appeal process into the administrative appeal act. If the Government wants to establish special administrative appeal system, the revision states to cooperate with the Central Administrative Appeal Commission. However, we should think once a more on the process that states to cooperate with the temporary agency, the Commission.
It is the spirit of the Constitution that asserts to apply due process to administrative appeal process. It seems like to persue the constitutional spirit with respect to reinforce the right of the process in this revision. The establishment of the application for an objection against the Commission's decision is also a trait of the revision. However, it prone to questionable on the efficiency of the system to judge the objection which was decided by the same commission. In addition, the Government newly established the disqualification of the representatives of the committee for fair administrative appeals.
Moreover, the revision expanded remedy system to reinforce the citizen's right of relief function by administrative appeal. Firstly, the revision eased the condition of suspension of execution. It was modified from "damage prevention that hard to recover" to "prevent occurrence of the significant damage." Then, it was able to revitalize suspension of execution. Secondly, temporary disposition system was newly established. It is possible to commence temporary disposition that puts on the temporary position to prohibit significant disadvantage that the party might receive or urgent danger. Finally, it is also evaluable to newly establishes online administrative appeal application system upon the internet period that trends in general.
The recent revision of the Administrative appeals act suggested more due process to apply. The claimant for adjudgment is able to get remedy on specific position In the organized adm inistrative appeal process and it is expected to see the function of the regulation on administrative action.
It is the spirit of the Constitution that asserts to apply due process to administrative appeal process. It seems like to persue the constitutional spirit with respect to reinforce the right of the process in this revision. The establishment of the application for an objection against the Commission's decision is also a trait of the revision. However, it prone to questionable on the efficiency of the system to judge the objection which was decided by the same commission. In addition, the Government newly established the disqualification of the representatives of the committee for fair administrative appeals.
Moreover, the revision expanded remedy system to reinforce the citizen's right of relief function by administrative appeal. Firstly, the revision eased the condition of suspension of execution. It was modified from "damage prevention that hard to recover" to "prevent occurrence of the significant damage." Then, it was able to revitalize suspension of execution. Secondly, temporary disposition system was newly established. It is possible to commence temporary disposition that puts on the temporary position to prohibit significant disadvantage that the party might receive or urgent danger. Finally, it is also evaluable to newly establishes online administrative appeal application system upon the internet period that trends in general.
The recent revision of the Administrative appeals act suggested more due process to apply. The claimant for adjudgment is able to get remedy on specific position In the organized adm inistrative appeal process and it is expected to see the function of the regulation on administrative action.
#행정심판법
#특별행정심판
#행정심판기관
#행정심판위원회
#심판청구인
#이의신청
#집행정지
#임시처분
#온라인 행정심판청구제도
#Administrative Appeals Act
#special administrative appeals
#administrative appeals agency
#administrative appeal commission
#claimant for adjudgment
#application for an objection
#suspension of execution
#temporary disposition
#online administrative appeal application system
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 특별행정심판제도의 신설요건과 그 규제
Ⅲ. 행정심판기관의 소관 범위조정과 공정성 등 보장제도
Ⅳ. 심판청구인 등의 절차적 권리강화
Ⅴ. 행정심판법상 가구제의 확대
Ⅵ. 결론
[참고문헌]
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (25)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
국무총리행정심판위원회와 시ㆍ도행정 심판위원회의 통합 논의에 관한 고찰
고려법학
2009 .01
-
행정심판법 개정 법률안에 관한 평가연구
중앙법학
2007 .10
-
행정심판위원회제도의 현황과 과제
원광법학
2010 .01
-
行政審判의 기능과 審判機關의 구성 : ‘行政審判의 司法化’에 대한 異議
행정법연구
2015 .07
-
행정심판제도의 현황과 발전방향
행정법연구
2015 .11
-
행정심판제도의 개정에 관한 동향
법학논총
2009 .02
-
개별법상 이의신청제도의 현황분석과 입법적 개선과제 : 이의신청 등과 행정심판의 관계정립을 중심으로
행정법연구
2015 .07
-
행정심판 재결의 기속력과 피청구인인 행정청의 불복가능성
행정법연구
2018 .08
-
사회보험 관련법상 특별행정심판제도에 대한 고찰 : 일반행정심판제도와의 통합에 관한 논의를 중심으로
법학연구
2012 .02
-
國際聯合行政上의 諸問題
국제법학회논총
1960 .04
-
헌법 제107조 제3항이 규정하고 있는 ‘준사법절차’의 의미 : 헌재 2000.6.1, 98헌바8, 헌재2001.6.28. 2000헌바30 결정을 소재로 하여
공법학연구
2012 .11
-
「행정심판법」 상 취소심판의 쟁송물
한양법학
2018 .08
-
동아시아 행정심판제도 비교연구
행정법연구
2008 .08
-
몽골 행정심판제도의 개선방안에 관한 연구
동북아법연구
2018 .01
-
행정심판의 헌법상 근거 : 헌법 제107조 제3항의 해석을 중심으로
행정법연구
2016 .02
-
행정심판사건의 행정소송결과 분석
행정법연구
2007 .08
-
프랑스, 미국에서의 행정행위 개념에 대한 소고
행정법연구
2007 .12
-
사회보장의 권리구제 : 영국의 심판소제도를 중심으로
노동법논총
2018 .12
-
무역위원회의 판정에 대한 사법심사 가능성 소고 : 서울행정법원 2007. 8. 14. 선고 2007구합825 판결
행정법연구
2007 .08
-
영국 행정심판 통합사례에 관한 연구
공법학연구
2018 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-363-003958217