지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
I explore on correlation between the system of judicial decision after due consideration of circumstances(Sajeungpankeyul) and public welfare in this article. Our country introduced the system of judicial decision after due consideration of circumstances to secure public welfare, nevertheless this judicial system is against the principle of constitutional government. Our Administrative Litigation Act has provided on judicial decision after due consideration of circumstances at Article 12 and Article 28 since 1951.
Most of scholars can not define an exact definition of public welfare which is the requirement of judicial decision after due consideration of circumstances because of uncertainness, abstractness, vagueness and comprehensiveness of that notion. So the judiciary hasn't defined it directly but has explained it indirectly in lots of cases. Therefore the judiciary is apt to interpret and apply it arbitrarily to a case. For that reason, it is needed to establish reasonable and concrete criteria to apply public welfare to a case.
It is difficult to find discrimination between the notion of public welfare and that of public interest. Most of scholars majoring on public law regard two notions as same thing. But I think that the notion of public welfare is more comprehensive and broader than that of public interest.
In conclusion, We have discovered some adverse effects of the system of judicial decision after due consideration of circumstances. It has to be gradually disappeared by utilizing alternatives as like temporary litigation system and preventing each case from accumulation of facts over the illegal administrative dispositions.
Most of scholars can not define an exact definition of public welfare which is the requirement of judicial decision after due consideration of circumstances because of uncertainness, abstractness, vagueness and comprehensiveness of that notion. So the judiciary hasn't defined it directly but has explained it indirectly in lots of cases. Therefore the judiciary is apt to interpret and apply it arbitrarily to a case. For that reason, it is needed to establish reasonable and concrete criteria to apply public welfare to a case.
It is difficult to find discrimination between the notion of public welfare and that of public interest. Most of scholars majoring on public law regard two notions as same thing. But I think that the notion of public welfare is more comprehensive and broader than that of public interest.
In conclusion, We have discovered some adverse effects of the system of judicial decision after due consideration of circumstances. It has to be gradually disappeared by utilizing alternatives as like temporary litigation system and preventing each case from accumulation of facts over the illegal administrative dispositions.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 사정판결제도 일반론
Ⅲ. 사정판결 요건으로서의 공공복리
Ⅳ. 우리 판례상의 사정판결
Ⅴ. 마치며
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (33)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
법학전문대학원 설치인가관련 판결의 행정법적 검토 (제척사유의 해석 및 위임입법권과 재량권의 한계, 사정판결의 판단기준) - 대법원 2009.12.10선고 2009두8359판결 및 2009.12.10.선고 2009두14606 판결을 중심으로1)
고려법학
2010 .01
-
JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE RATE MAKING DECISIONS IN THE UNITED STATES
저스티스
1975 .12
-
대법원장의 지위와 사법행정권
서강법학
2009 .06
-
The Supreme Court`s Endorsement of A Politicized Judiciary : A Philosophical Critique
법학논총
2014 .01
-
중국 사법개혁 현황과 시사점
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2014 .12
-
무역위원회의 판정에 대한 사법심사 가능성 소고 : 서울행정법원 2007. 8. 14. 선고 2007구합825 판결
행정법연구
2007 .08
-
공공사회복지전달체계 개편의 문제점과 개선방안
한국사회과학연구
2012 .12
-
한국형 복지체제의 특성 : OECD 국가들과의 비교 분석
아세아연구
2007 .09
-
한국과 중국 헌법상 공공복리 실현원리에 관한 비교 연구
동북아법연구
2020 .01
-
日本國憲法상 國民의 司法參加에 관한 硏究
공법학연구
2004 .05
-
“Welfare without welfare-state” and “welfare-state without welfare” : Fundamental cause of health inequalities in East Asian welfare capitalism
한국사회학회 사회학대회 논문집
2015 .06
-
중국 사법해석제도에 관한 고찰 : 최고인민법원의 사법해석을 중심으로
비교사법
2008 .06
-
헌법적 공공복리와 저작재산권 제한으로서의 공정이용
언론과법
2019 .04
-
韓國의 司法制度改革의 動向과 課題
동아법학
2007 .08
-
북한의 노동복지법제 비교분석: 로동법과 외국인투자기업로동법을 중심으로
통일과 평화
2018 .01
-
행정법학의 개념과그 외연(外延) : 제도중심의 공법학방법론을 위한 시론(試論)
행정법연구
2008 .08
-
美國에 있어서의 司法의 公共政策形成
미국헌법연구
2005 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-363-003958222