지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Since the conservative and right-wing administration has born in 2007, a reactionism has extensively been widespread in korean society. In the korean judiciary, there are some signs to turn back to the past. The recent case of Justice Shin Yeong-Chul is a typical one.
In the light of korean constitutional history, the judicial independence was influenced, at first, by the character of political power, which held an administrativeand legislative power. The authoritarian political power that dominated R.O.Korea for a long time had made the judicial system of the constitutional law as an only functional regime rather than as a powerholder standing in rivalry with an administrative and legislative power. The democratization of political power, therefore, is a necessary precondition of a judicial independence. The Chief Justice and judges, however, can resist and protest to the political power to protect a judicial independence from a judicial infringement. This protest means political power struggle for the democracy and the rule of law and the judicial independence.
The judicial administration of the korean judiciary has two faces ; one is that of judicial power. The other is that of judicial function. The former means that the judiciary is a co-holder of political power and the latter means that the judiciary is one of state functions. In the korean constitutional history, the judicial administration has many problems. To sum up, there are problems as follows ; judge management system, the judicial budget system, the specialty of judges, the absence of a reasonable judicial performance evaluation system, a small scale of court system, th absence of autonomy of judicial administration in the inferior courts. For the judicial independence, it is necessary to amend the constitution including judicial system more precisely.
In the light of korean constitutional history, the judicial independence was influenced, at first, by the character of political power, which held an administrativeand legislative power. The authoritarian political power that dominated R.O.Korea for a long time had made the judicial system of the constitutional law as an only functional regime rather than as a powerholder standing in rivalry with an administrative and legislative power. The democratization of political power, therefore, is a necessary precondition of a judicial independence. The Chief Justice and judges, however, can resist and protest to the political power to protect a judicial independence from a judicial infringement. This protest means political power struggle for the democracy and the rule of law and the judicial independence.
The judicial administration of the korean judiciary has two faces ; one is that of judicial power. The other is that of judicial function. The former means that the judiciary is a co-holder of political power and the latter means that the judiciary is one of state functions. In the korean constitutional history, the judicial administration has many problems. To sum up, there are problems as follows ; judge management system, the judicial budget system, the specialty of judges, the absence of a reasonable judicial performance evaluation system, a small scale of court system, th absence of autonomy of judicial administration in the inferior courts. For the judicial independence, it is necessary to amend the constitution including judicial system more precisely.
목차
Ⅰ. 서언
Ⅱ. 대법원장의 지위와 사법행정권
Ⅲ. 현행헌법상 대법원장의 지위와 사법행정권
Ⅳ. 결론에 대신하여
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (24)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
중국 사법개혁 현황과 시사점
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2014 .12
-
The Supreme Court`s Endorsement of A Politicized Judiciary : A Philosophical Critique
법학논총
2014 .01
-
중국 사법해석제도에 관한 고찰 : 최고인민법원의 사법해석을 중심으로
비교사법
2008 .06
-
韓國의 司法制度改革의 動向과 課題
동아법학
2007 .08
-
日本國憲法상 國民의 司法參加에 관한 硏究
공법학연구
2004 .05
-
사건배당과 법관 승진제도의 문제점과 개선방안
서강법학
2009 .06
-
1864년 사법개혁 이전의 러시아 사법제도와 사법관료
러시아연구
2009 .01
-
日帝時代의 司法制度
동아법학
2007 .02
-
판결서의 구조와 양식에 관한 비교법적 고찰
비교사법
2009 .09
-
법관의 임용과 인사제도의 개혁방안
서강법학
2009 .06
-
사법권 독립에 대한 비판적 검토 : 독립과 책임의 조화를 중심으로
한국정치학회보
2015 .03
-
법관의 사법행정참여에 관한 연구
법이론실무연구
2020 .08
-
사법심사의 정당성 논란에 대한 관견
동아법학
2011 .02
-
중국의 지적재산권 사법심사제도에 관한 고찰
한양법학
2010 .08
-
한국과 중국 간 민사사법공조조약에 관한 소고
기업법연구
2005 .09
-
사법부의 독립성과 책임성 : 미국의 법관징계제도를 중심으로
미국헌법연구
2005 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-018837490