지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article presents an analysis on the meaning of the year numbering system as the way to mark the passage of nation’s history, with focus on the Kong Ziera and the Huang Di era.
This article discusses the following issues: the collapse of the Sino-centric world order and a fundamental shift in historical awareness in the late Qing; the ways of the new year numbering system and the wherefores of the Kong Ziera & the Huang Diera’s popularity in the late Qing; the revival of the discourse on the Kong Zi era & the Huang Di era in the early 21st century; the differences and the similarities between 20th century & 21st century discourse on the Kong Zi era & the Huang Di era.
How the years are counted in China is an important proposition pertaining to its national identity. Reformers and revolutionaries attacked the imperial system of eponymous dating using the reign name and began proposing alternatives in the late Qing. The constitutional reformers advocated the Kong Ziera, while the anti-Manchu revolutionaries advocated the Huang Diera. Today, both Kong Ziand Huang Dienjoy a renaissance with the rise of China in the 21st century. Kong Zi and Huang Di remain the most prominent symbols of the Sino-centric world. The ensuing battle over the Kong Ziera & the Huang Di era as China’s own native periodization scheme becomes entangled with many issues concerning the Christian era, cultural identity, nationalism and the national identity.
In conclusion, I repeat that the discourse on the year numbering system related to power and hegemony is subject to variation from time to time as the need arises.
This article discusses the following issues: the collapse of the Sino-centric world order and a fundamental shift in historical awareness in the late Qing; the ways of the new year numbering system and the wherefores of the Kong Ziera & the Huang Diera’s popularity in the late Qing; the revival of the discourse on the Kong Zi era & the Huang Di era in the early 21st century; the differences and the similarities between 20th century & 21st century discourse on the Kong Zi era & the Huang Di era.
How the years are counted in China is an important proposition pertaining to its national identity. Reformers and revolutionaries attacked the imperial system of eponymous dating using the reign name and began proposing alternatives in the late Qing. The constitutional reformers advocated the Kong Ziera, while the anti-Manchu revolutionaries advocated the Huang Diera. Today, both Kong Ziand Huang Dienjoy a renaissance with the rise of China in the 21st century. Kong Zi and Huang Di remain the most prominent symbols of the Sino-centric world. The ensuing battle over the Kong Ziera & the Huang Di era as China’s own native periodization scheme becomes entangled with many issues concerning the Christian era, cultural identity, nationalism and the national identity.
In conclusion, I repeat that the discourse on the year numbering system related to power and hegemony is subject to variation from time to time as the need arises.
목차
1. 강희 50년(1711)의 사건 - 대명세와 『남산집』안
2. 광서 21년(1896)의 사건 - 〈강학보〉의 폐간
3. 20세기 초 - 공자기년과 황제기년의 경쟁
4. 21세기 초 - 공자와 황제의 부활
5. 기년, 그 낡고도 새로운 논쟁
〈參考文獻〉
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (3)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-820-000518397