지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Jang Hyeongwang is one of the prominent confucian scholars in Chosun Dynasty. lang Hyeongwang belonged to the Toegye School. Nevertheless his theory of Li and Ch’i(gt), what is called li-gi-gyeong-wi-seol in some respect, was not similar to Toegye’s but to Yulgok’s, So, after 1920s, the philosophy of lang has been studied by many modern Confucianism researchers.
Roughly speaking, many researchers’ arguments have been focused on two main issues. On the question of where Jang’s theory stands between Toegye s and Yulgok’s, there are four different views. While some of modern scholars hold a view that Jang’s theory is closer to Yulgok’s, others maintain that lang succeeded Toegye’s philosophical mind whose main intention was to enhance the position of Li. In the other hand, Some scholars have an opinion that lang’s theory is a proper compromise between Toegye’s and Yulgok s, others insist that Jang’s theory is original theory transcending both Toegye’s and Yulgok’s.
Another issue is concerning how Jang’s theory of Li and Ch’i can be ontologically conceptualized. Over this topic Tao-monism has been in conflict with Li-monism. Some people who regard Jang’s theory as Tao-monism understand that Tao is the only substance in Jang’s philosophy. Others who regard Jang’s theory as Li-monism insist that Li is the only substance in Jang’s philosophy. Besides, there are opinions that Jang’s theory can be prescribed as li-gi-il-won(原)-non or li-gi-il-bon(本)-non looking upon Li and Ch’i as one origin. Hence, according to them, the main characteristics of Jang’s theory is the unified relations between Li and Ch’i in this world.
Roughly speaking, many researchers’ arguments have been focused on two main issues. On the question of where Jang’s theory stands between Toegye s and Yulgok’s, there are four different views. While some of modern scholars hold a view that Jang’s theory is closer to Yulgok’s, others maintain that lang succeeded Toegye’s philosophical mind whose main intention was to enhance the position of Li. In the other hand, Some scholars have an opinion that lang’s theory is a proper compromise between Toegye’s and Yulgok s, others insist that Jang’s theory is original theory transcending both Toegye’s and Yulgok’s.
Another issue is concerning how Jang’s theory of Li and Ch’i can be ontologically conceptualized. Over this topic Tao-monism has been in conflict with Li-monism. Some people who regard Jang’s theory as Tao-monism understand that Tao is the only substance in Jang’s philosophy. Others who regard Jang’s theory as Li-monism insist that Li is the only substance in Jang’s philosophy. Besides, there are opinions that Jang’s theory can be prescribed as li-gi-il-won(原)-non or li-gi-il-bon(本)-non looking upon Li and Ch’i as one origin. Hence, according to them, the main characteristics of Jang’s theory is the unified relations between Li and Ch’i in this world.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 이황 및 이이의 학설과의 비교
Ⅲ. 장현광의 리기론에 대한 규정
Ⅳ. 장현광 성리설의 기원과 영향
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
【Abstract】
참고문헌 (25)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
여헌 장현광의 정치운영론과 성리설
한국인물사연구
2014 .03
-
퇴계학과의 비교를 통해 본 장현광의 성리설 : 사단칠정론을 중심으로
한국학논집
2013 .09
-
전우의 이황 성리설에 대한 비판적 해석
유학연구
2017 .01
-
朱熹 “理氣論”과 성경속의 “靈”·“肉” 談論
한중언어문화연구
2020 .01
-
경북북부지역 退漢學派의 票谷學 비판에 관한 연구
철학연구
2010 .12
-
졸재 유원지의 심성론과 퇴계학설 옹호
동양고전연구
2008 .01
-
Yulgok and the Logic of Li and Qi
Korea Journal
2002 .12
-
朱子의 심신관계론과 현대 심리철학 - 과학적 물리일원론의 시대에 있어 理氣心性論의 의의와 한계 탐색 -
온지논총
2008 .01
-
당력고
동아문화
1989 .12
-
퇴계철학을 통해 본 『活人心方』의 질병과 양생의 의미
동양철학연구
2005 .01
-
The Doctrine of LI and CH'I in Models of Western Philosophy
신학논단
1982 .12
-
퇴계학파는 퇴계의 성리학을 어떻게 이해하고 계승했는가? : 갈암 이현일의 율곡 비판을 중심으로
철학연구
2004 .02
-
朱子의 理와 그에 대한 몇 가지 해석 : 비판적 고찰
온지논총
2008 .01
-
장현광 성리설의 연원에 대한 고찰 − 나흠순 성리설과의 관련을 중심으로 −
동양고전연구
2010 .01
-
주희와 율곡의 사유에 대한 현대적 접근
동서사상
2012 .02
-
율곡의 리기론에 대한 현대적 고찰
철학논총
2006 .10
-
퇴계 이황의 리(理)에 대한 해석의 갈래 －“리동(理動)·리발(理發)·리도(理到)” 이해를 중심으로－
태동고전연구
2017 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-051-000521031