지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In France under the early German occupation(1940-1941), the pro-Petain Resistance forces were larger than the anti-Vichy and anti-Petain Resistance forces. Above all, this situation arose from the fact that it was quite common for the French people to regard Marshal Petain, ‘a hero of the first World War’, as a savior/protector of their fatherland. Frenay’s ‘Liberation Nationale’, ‘Liberte’ and the General Cochet did not only admire Petain as an individual, but also supported the domestic policy of Vichy government. The attitude favorable to Petain was discovered even in several anti-Vichy Resistance organizations.
However, there were certainly the anti-Vichy and anti-Petain Resistance organizations from the outset such as ‘Valmy’, La France continue, ‘Liberation-Sud’, Cahiers du Temoignage chretien, ‘Franc-Tireur’, and the French Communist Party. Except for the French Communist Party and Valmy, most of these appeared quite late. It meant that these groups launched their activities when the pro-Petain Resistance organizations already began to change their positions toward anti-Petain.
While the French Communist Party converted from ambiguous neutrality to hostility and resistance toward the German occupation authorities, some Resistance organizations such as ‘Liberation Nationale’ and ‘Liberte’, changed from pro-Petain to anti-Petain positions. Both cases converged into the same anti-German and anti-Vichy stance.
Conversion from pro-Petain to anti-Petain by some Resistance organizations, above all, was attributed to the actions of Vichy government and its head, Petain, whose collaboration with Germany had expanded into the military field and repression of the Resistance. This conversion was more propelled by the integration of Liberation Nationale and Liberte. The outcome of this integration, Combat finally declared a separation from Petain in May 1942.
However, there were certainly the anti-Vichy and anti-Petain Resistance organizations from the outset such as ‘Valmy’, La France continue, ‘Liberation-Sud’, Cahiers du Temoignage chretien, ‘Franc-Tireur’, and the French Communist Party. Except for the French Communist Party and Valmy, most of these appeared quite late. It meant that these groups launched their activities when the pro-Petain Resistance organizations already began to change their positions toward anti-Petain.
While the French Communist Party converted from ambiguous neutrality to hostility and resistance toward the German occupation authorities, some Resistance organizations such as ‘Liberation Nationale’ and ‘Liberte’, changed from pro-Petain to anti-Petain positions. Both cases converged into the same anti-German and anti-Vichy stance.
Conversion from pro-Petain to anti-Petain by some Resistance organizations, above all, was attributed to the actions of Vichy government and its head, Petain, whose collaboration with Germany had expanded into the military field and repression of the Resistance. This conversion was more propelled by the integration of Liberation Nationale and Liberte. The outcome of this integration, Combat finally declared a separation from Petain in May 1942.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 친페탱 레지스탕스
Ⅲ. 반(反)비시-반(反)페탱 레지스탕스
Ⅳ. 전환과 수렴: 친페탱에서 반페탱으로
Ⅴ. 맺음말
〈Re?sume?〉
〈Summary〉
참고문헌 (72)
참고문헌 신청
1. [기타자료] - / / Appel du 22 octobre 1941 / Discours aux Français : 184 ~ 204
2. [단행본] - André Caudron / 1992 / Les Petites ailes: Journal et réseau (automne 1940-été 1941) / MEMOR : 41 ~ 42
3. [기타자료] - Azéma / / De Munich à la Libération : 115 ~ 380
4. [기타자료] - Bédarida / / 1940-1941: catholiques résistants en zone occupée : 177 ~
5. [기타자료] - Bellanger / / Histoire générale de la presse française, t. IV : 108 ~ 109
2. [단행본] - André Caudron / 1992 / Les Petites ailes: Journal et réseau (automne 1940-été 1941) / MEMOR : 41 ~ 42
3. [기타자료] - Azéma / / De Munich à la Libération : 115 ~ 380
4. [기타자료] - Bédarida / / 1940-1941: catholiques résistants en zone occupée : 177 ~
5. [기타자료] - Bellanger / / Histoire générale de la presse française, t. IV : 108 ~ 109
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-926-000309462