지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
One hands, all WTO members have the fundamental right to take sanitary and phytosanitary measures(“SPS measures”) necessary for the protection of their consumers, animals and plants from health risks. The other hands, members shall ensure that their sanitary and phytosanitary measures do not arbitrarily or unjustifiably discriminate between Members where identical or similar conditions prevail, including between their own territory and that of other Members. Sanitary and phytosanitary measures shall not be applied in a manner which would constitute a disguised restriction on international trade. This obligation under the Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (“SPS Agreement”) was to described in Article 5.5. The Article 5.5 indicates that a complaint of violation of this Article must show the presence of three distinct elements.
The first element is that the member imposing the measure complained of its own appropriate levels of sanitary protection in several different situations. The second element to be shown is that those levels of protection exhibit arbitrary or unjustifiable differences in their treatment of different situations. The last element requires that the arbitrary or unjustifiable differences result in discrimination or a disguised restriction of international trade.
This thesis focus on interpretation of the three element of Article 5 of SPS Agreement, and aims at highlighting a number of lessons to be learnt from the present WTO system concerning distinctions in Levels of Protection.
The first element is that the member imposing the measure complained of its own appropriate levels of sanitary protection in several different situations. The second element to be shown is that those levels of protection exhibit arbitrary or unjustifiable differences in their treatment of different situations. The last element requires that the arbitrary or unjustifiable differences result in discrimination or a disguised restriction of international trade.
This thesis focus on interpretation of the three element of Article 5 of SPS Agreement, and aims at highlighting a number of lessons to be learnt from the present WTO system concerning distinctions in Levels of Protection.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 적정보호수준 결정의 요건
Ⅲ. 상이한 상황에서 적정보호수준의 구별
Ⅳ. 자의적이거나 부당한 구별
Ⅴ. 차별 또는 국제무역에 대한 위장된 제한
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (16)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김동민 / 2003 / WTO/SPS 분쟁사례연구-호주 연어분쟁을 중심으로- / 농업경영.정책연구 30 (3) : 507 ~ 523
2. [단행본] - 김승호 / 2007 / WTO 통상분쟁 판례해설(1) / 법영사
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 박명섭 / 2002 / WTO 體制下의 食品 安全性과 SPS 協定에 관한 硏究 / 통상법률 (44) : 30 ~ 51
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 박원석 / 2007 / WTO SPS 위생조치의 적법성에 관한 연구 / 중앙법학 9 (2) : 197 ~ 230
7. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이은섭 / 2004 / WTO 위생검역협정상 위험평가 및 보호수준의 적정성 / 국제상학 19 (2) : 205 ~ 228
2. [단행본] - 김승호 / 2007 / WTO 통상분쟁 판례해설(1) / 법영사
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 박명섭 / 2002 / WTO 體制下의 食品 安全性과 SPS 協定에 관한 硏究 / 통상법률 (44) : 30 ~ 51
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 박원석 / 2007 / WTO SPS 위생조치의 적법성에 관한 연구 / 중앙법학 9 (2) : 197 ~ 230
7. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이은섭 / 2004 / WTO 위생검역협정상 위험평가 및 보호수준의 적정성 / 국제상학 19 (2) : 205 ~ 228
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-326-000656495