지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
It is hard to define double-translation. Although it is an important topic considering its relation with practice of writing, predominantly, it has been viewed as negatively. However, double-translation has played an important role in creating the Korean modern literature identity. Except for Yim Wha, most authors of Korean literature did not study the relationship between Korean modern literature and double-translation. From its negative point of view, double-translation is nothing more than forging. However, it is practically impossible to translate Japanese directly which was translated from the works of Western literature. Even if the translation was conducted on the Japanese translation, it is reasonable to conclude that the Korean modern language has formed its basis through transformation and refraction in the double-translation process. Moreover, double-translation was a method that necessitated at the time. It was the best alternative way when Western literary works were not readily available. There are three reasons why most of the translation works were relying on double-translation during the period of Enlightenment to Liberalization. The first reason lies in the pressing need of enlightenment at the time. As a means of enlightenment, rather than mere translation it emphasized on spreading knowledge of the modern Western society. Secondly, the logic of the weak is applied. As LuXun points out, countries such as Korea and China were considered as relatively weak because they were either going through a time of enlightenment or revolution. Third is immanency. A time of enlightenment for Korea and revolutionary periods in China spared no room to consider for the method of translation as importing Western knowledge as quickly as possible was the foremost priority. Today the prospects of double-translation are different, because the historical situation is different. Double-translation is no more at the source of a complex, but instead it is recognized as the “mark of the translator’s efforts” (Kim Hyun). The fact that translation studies stress the need to consult previous translations in order to enhance one’s own translation, tells us that double-translation is no longer a taboo nor a mis-translation.
목차
Ⅰ. 중역 ‘일반론’에 관한 몇 가지 물음들
Ⅱ. 중역의 개념적 파장과 시기의 특수성이라는 딜레마
Ⅲ. 중역의 이율배반 ① : 한국문학사에서 배척되어온 중역
Ⅳ. 중역의 이율배반 ② : 단일한 곳으로 수렴되지 않는 중역의 파장
Ⅴ. 중역의 이율배반 ③ : 황단과 전환의 관점에서 보아야 하는 중역
Ⅵ. 폐쇄된 현실과 열린 가능성
Ⅶ. 중역의 세 가지 알리바이
Ⅷ. 결론을 대신하여
참고문헌
abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
한국근대소설 형성 동인으로서의 번역ㆍ번안 : 근대초기 번역ㆍ번안소설의 전개 양상을 중심으로
강현조
한국근대문학연구
2012
.10
중역되는 사상, 직역되는 문학 : 『개벽』의 번역관에 나타난 식민지 검열과 이중출판시장의 간극
한기형
아세아연구
2011
.12
일제강점 초기 식민지 문화의 재편, 신문소설 삽화 〈長恨夢〉
김지혜
미술사논단
2010
.12
韓國에 있어서 尾崎紅葉의 『金色夜叉』의 受容에 관한 硏究 : 變貌된 여주인공의 캐릭터를 中心으로
韓光洙
일본문화학보
1996
.10
앙리 메쇼닉 : 시학-주체-번역-예술(2회) : ‘시학과 언어이론 : 소쉬르와 벤브니스트에서 출발하기
조재룡
계간 모:든시
2018
.06
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-910-000710025