메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
정석 (경원대학교)
저널정보
서울시립대학교 서울학연구소 서울학연구 서울학연구 제40호
발행연도
2010.8
수록면
207 - 253 (47page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Fifteen years have passed since local autonomy was reintroduced in Korea. Four mayors directly elected by Seoul citizens served only one term each. This study aims to explore the continuity and change in Bukchon policy over the last ten years (1999-2009), and find out the answer to the following question: Does the new mayor continue or change the former mayor’s policy in the era of local autonomy?
This study surveyed official documents, reports and texts of speeches, and interviewed government officials, professionals and resident representatives who participated in the planning and implementation process of the Bukchon policy. The study then analyzed the continuity and change in the Bukchon policy in four aspects: policy status, planning and the legal system, organization and manpower, and projects and budgets. In addition to the literature review, a Delphi survey of the participants in the planning and implementation process of the Bukchon policy was also conducted. The survey analysis showed the following conclusions: First, every time Seoul city has a new mayor, the Bukchon policy is changed because the new mayor had his own will, pledge and policy priority different from that of the
former mayor. The goal of the Bukchon policy was changed from preservation of the residential area to invigoration of tourism. The status of the organization in charge and manpower also changed several times. Second, the Bukchon policy underwent many changes after a new mayor was elected. In spite of this, the Bukchon policy has continued as a whole. Although the changes were remarkable at the early stages of the new mayor’s term, the policy returned to its condition, and occasionally, the policy was rather strengthened after the new mayor’s mid-term. Third, although the Bukchon policy continued without interruptions, it was not consistent. Good examples of this include the change in the goals of policy, change of the competent authority from Housing Bureau to Culture Bureau and its return to Housing Bureau, and several changes in the organization in charge. In the era of local autonomy, there is, and will be, a lot of room for change in the Bukchon policy as long as the mayor changes. Accordingly, an institutional framework is needed in order to continue the Bukchon policy and keep it constant. It is necessary to implement the Bukchon policy consistently according to a long term plan which has a legal force, or enact the Bukchon Ordinance that clearly stipulates the goals and basic principles of the Bukchon policy. This should be discussed in depth in further studies.

목차

I. 서론
II. 북촌정책의 수립과 시행
III. 북촌정책의 지속과 변화 분석
IV. 분석의 종합 및 평가
V. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (44)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-911-000837302