지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Self-supporting, self-reliance, self-determination are modern key words in social welfare. To encourage self-supporting is the most fundamental purpose of modern social welfare, and self-determination is an ultimate constituent of self-supporting. In this paper, I intend to define self-determination in social welfare compared to general self-determination or self-determination right in law. And marketization of social welfare is main method to promote self-supporting of requiring social service, indeed marketization of social welfare promote and expend self-determination? to confirm of that is the main purpose of this paper.
Self-determination in social welfare is characteristic as follows. First, self-determination might not go with self-responsibility. Second, self-determination is not connected right through to self-determination.
Third, it is not easy to accomplish pure self-determination, because social services are not only connected with many partners, family, social worker, public social welfare servant, but also social servises are demanded of finance. Fourth, the nonuse of self-determination is use of self-determination too.
marketization of social welfare is standing on the assumption that economic basis(rational economic human, pareto efficiency etc.) But these assumptions do not coincide with the practice social case work. Market in social welfare should have not only freedom but fairness or equity and social solidarity as elements of that.
In conclusion, I could confirm through this study that marketization of social welfare does not promote or enlarge self-determination of social service users.
Self-determination in social welfare is characteristic as follows. First, self-determination might not go with self-responsibility. Second, self-determination is not connected right through to self-determination.
Third, it is not easy to accomplish pure self-determination, because social services are not only connected with many partners, family, social worker, public social welfare servant, but also social servises are demanded of finance. Fourth, the nonuse of self-determination is use of self-determination too.
marketization of social welfare is standing on the assumption that economic basis(rational economic human, pareto efficiency etc.) But these assumptions do not coincide with the practice social case work. Market in social welfare should have not only freedom but fairness or equity and social solidarity as elements of that.
In conclusion, I could confirm through this study that marketization of social welfare does not promote or enlarge self-determination of social service users.
목차
Ⅰ. 서설
Ⅱ. 사회보장에서 자기결정의 의의
Ⅲ. 사회보장의 시장화와 자기결정
Ⅳ. 시장화는 사회보장에서 자기결정을 확대하는가?
Ⅴ. 결어
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (27)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김교연 / 2002 / 정신지체인의 자기결정(Self-determination)에 대한 일고찰 / 成志재활연구 (10)
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 방명애 / 2006 / 자기결정기술 활동프로그램의 적용이 정신지체 학생의 자기결정기술에 미치는 영향 / 재활복지 10 (1) : 64 ~ 84
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이경준 / 2005 / 장애인의 자기결정과 보장원리 / 재활복지 9 (2) : 114 ~ 141
6. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이철우 / 2010 / 사회복지 실천현장에서의 3가지 윤리적 딜레마 / Social worker
7. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이호용 / 2010 / 낳지 않을 자유와 자기결정 / 세계헌법연구 16 (3) : 209 ~ 240
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 방명애 / 2006 / 자기결정기술 활동프로그램의 적용이 정신지체 학생의 자기결정기술에 미치는 영향 / 재활복지 10 (1) : 64 ~ 84
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이경준 / 2005 / 장애인의 자기결정과 보장원리 / 재활복지 9 (2) : 114 ~ 141
6. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이철우 / 2010 / 사회복지 실천현장에서의 3가지 윤리적 딜레마 / Social worker
7. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이호용 / 2010 / 낳지 않을 자유와 자기결정 / 세계헌법연구 16 (3) : 209 ~ 240
이 논문과 연관된 판례 (1)
-
헌법재판소 1990. 9. 10. 선고 89헌마82 전원재판부〔합헌〕
1. 가. 선량(善良)한 성도덕(性道德)과 일부일처주의(一夫一妻主義)·혼인제도(婚姻制度)의 유지(維持) 및 가족생활(家族生活)의 보장(保障)을 위하여서나 부부간(夫婦間)의 성적성실의무(性的誠實義務)의 수호(守護)를 위하여, 그리고 간통(姦通)으로 인하여 야기되는 사회적(社會的) 해악(害惡)의 사전예방(事前豫防)을 위하여, 간통행위(
자세히 보기
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-000849745