메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
기유정 (서울대학교)
저널정보
서울시립대학교 서울학연구소 서울학연구 서울학연구 제28호
발행연도
2007.2
수록면
1 - 34 (34page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study aims to reveal the existence of ‘politics of local men of repute(有志)’ and the operating logic of the system through investigating the activities of the Council of Kyungsung (Seoul) in 1920s. In 1920s, based on institutional changes of ‘amendment of local institutions’, policies using local men of repute as medium of governing occurred. However, the relationship between imperialist power and local men of repute could not be maintained only through oppressions, because the relationship was situated in a new political topography shaped by the 3.1 Liberation Movement and the then international circumstances. The members of the Council, composed of Japanese and Koreans who had been elected directly by residents (limited elections depending on tax revenue), managed in joint the consultation committee and furthermore they tried activities beyond institutional barriers as a consultation committee. Within these activities, the structure where the ruling Japanese in Chosun and the ruled Koreans were all under the same rule of law could be working. The Japanese in Chosun, who were imperialist rulers and subjects under the rule of law as well, cooperated with Koreans with the common interests and sometimes were in conflict with them, depending on issues. The international political situations and the political state of Japan and Chosun in 1920s made it possible a political space be, mainly maintained by local men of repute. Through mentioning the existence of this political space I don’t mean to deny the existence of the violence or oppression of imperialists. But I believe that it is a political phenomenon which cannot be explained only in the perspectives of oppression and one-sided rule, so I think that the development of a suitable terminology and concept for the phenomenon is urgently needed.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 明治 일본의 ‘名望家政治’와 그 논의
Ⅲ. 1920년 지방제도 개정과 경성부협의회
Ⅳ. 朝ㆍ日人 의원 간의 대립과 협력
Ⅴ. 경성부와 부협의회
Ⅵ. 선거와 유지정치
Ⅶ. 맺음말
참고문헌
ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (12)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-911-000922984