지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The funeral dress controversy(服制論爭) in 1919 was the confucian one. It was about whether Korean people and the officials should wear the funeral dress for emperor Gojong(高宗皇帝). Kim Taek-yeong(金澤榮) and Jo Geung-seop(曺兢燮) insisted that Korean wouldn’t need to wear for him. They thought he was an unable emperor, must take full responsibility for a fall of Daehan Jeguk(大韓帝國 : the Great Han Empire, 1897-1910). On the other hand, Jeon U(田愚), who was a famous conservative confucian at that time, and his disciple O Jin-yeong(吳鎭泳) were against Kim and Jo’s. They thought he had ruled Daehan Jeguk for 40 years and the fall was by reason of not him but Imperial Japan.
Now, let’s think of emperor Gojong. Didn’t he really take the responsibility for the fall? He was the emperor of Daehan Jeguk, and there were lots of bad results under the rule of him. Most of Korean historians admit that emperor Gojong was a fail. He really did it. If it is so, for the confucian who were against Kim and Jo’, the matter was likely to be not important.
Nevertheless emperor Gojong failed the empire, they thought that they must wear the funeral dress in several reasons. They believed he was the last of 500-year-continued confucian state, and the emperor was the empire itself. He sincerely ruled Korea(Joseon and Daehan Jeguk) for 40 years. He had appointed Jeon and many confucian to rule the empire once, though they refused it as soon as got appointed. And then, they didn’t submit good solutions to emperor Gojong too. Imperial Japan with Eulsa Ojeok(乙巳五賊 : the five traitors of the year of 1905) forced him to lose his empire. Finally, confucian believed that they must have a strong sense of duty for the empire.
We could consider Pari Jangseo Undong(巴里長書運動) as the same viewpoint which the emperor was the empire itself. Pari Jangseo Undong, named the 1st Confucian Independence Movement, was an effort to present a letter to the Peace Conference in Paris in 1919 to claim an independence of Korea by 137 conservative confucian. Why had they suddenly made efforts on the independence movement on a large scale? What’s the urgent reason? Did they have the new recognition on meaning of nation, state, sovereign, or independence? 137 confucian desired to reconstruct the confucian state such as Joseon and Daehan Jeguk of the past against our expectation.
Now, let’s think of emperor Gojong. Didn’t he really take the responsibility for the fall? He was the emperor of Daehan Jeguk, and there were lots of bad results under the rule of him. Most of Korean historians admit that emperor Gojong was a fail. He really did it. If it is so, for the confucian who were against Kim and Jo’, the matter was likely to be not important.
Nevertheless emperor Gojong failed the empire, they thought that they must wear the funeral dress in several reasons. They believed he was the last of 500-year-continued confucian state, and the emperor was the empire itself. He sincerely ruled Korea(Joseon and Daehan Jeguk) for 40 years. He had appointed Jeon and many confucian to rule the empire once, though they refused it as soon as got appointed. And then, they didn’t submit good solutions to emperor Gojong too. Imperial Japan with Eulsa Ojeok(乙巳五賊 : the five traitors of the year of 1905) forced him to lose his empire. Finally, confucian believed that they must have a strong sense of duty for the empire.
We could consider Pari Jangseo Undong(巴里長書運動) as the same viewpoint which the emperor was the empire itself. Pari Jangseo Undong, named the 1st Confucian Independence Movement, was an effort to present a letter to the Peace Conference in Paris in 1919 to claim an independence of Korea by 137 conservative confucian. Why had they suddenly made efforts on the independence movement on a large scale? What’s the urgent reason? Did they have the new recognition on meaning of nation, state, sovereign, or independence? 137 confucian desired to reconstruct the confucian state such as Joseon and Daehan Jeguk of the past against our expectation.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 服制논쟁의 발단과 전개
Ⅲ. 파리長書運動 참가자의 服制論
Ⅳ. 파리장서운동의 사상사적 성격
Ⅴ. 맺음말
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
대한제국의 생존전략과 '을사조약'
역사학보
2005 .12
-
‘簒奪’이란 이름으로 단죄된 ‘改革’ : 고독한 改革家 王莽의 理想國家
동양사학연구
2017 .06
-
파리長書運動의 기원과 在京儒林
한국독립운동사연구
2008 .06
-
Confucian Thought in Korea
Korea Journal
1977 .09
-
Confucian Influences On Korean Society
Korea Journal
1963 .09
-
3⋅1운동 100주년, 역사전쟁과 고종 독시(毒弑)
담론201
2019 .01
-
회당 장석영의 철학과 한주학 계승
한국학논집
2017 .03
-
파리장서운동의 전개와 영남지역의 숨은 협력자들
대동문화연구
2015 .01
-
대한제국기 순종의 西巡幸 연구 : 『西巡幸日記』를 중심으로
동북아역사논총
2011 .03
-
무인정권, 그리고 전란 속의 왕권 : 고려 고종(1192-1259) 연구
한국인물사연구
2009 .09
-
THE CONTEMPORARY CONFUCIAN HERITAGE AND THE ENVIRONMENT OF WORLDLY CONFUCIANS AND TOHAK CONFUCIANS
한국학연구원 학술대회
2011 .06
-
Formation of Confucian Ethics in Korea
Korea Journal
1973 .02
-
일본의 침략과 대한제국의 경운궁
한국독립운동사연구
2004 .08
-
Confucian Behavior Toward The Modernization of Korea, 1846-1910
Korea Journal
1973 .07
-
1905년 「保護條約」에 대한 高宗皇帝의 協商指示說 批判
역사학보
2005 .03
-
파리장서운동과 성주유림
대구사학
2019 .01
-
고려말 儒者의 집권과 사회정책
역사와 담론
2003 .12
-
Humanism in Confucian Thought
Korea Journal
1968 .02
-
The Changing Nature of Korean Confucian Personality under Japanese Rule
Korea Journal
1977 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-905-001048167