지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2009.11
- 수록면
- 75 - 96 (22page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
For a long time, America was regarded as a white men’s country. Even though native Americans and African Americans have resided as long as whites in the Unted States, they were not esteemed as fellow citizens by whites until the World War II. Through the World War II, the Cold War and the Civil Rights Movement, racism , racial practices, and the national identity of the Unite States suffered great change. It was the beginning of multiculturalism in the United States.
This article points three features of American multiculturalism. First, the most important driving force of American multiculturalism came from the civil rights movement. Therefore, the opposition of the American multiculturalism is racism and Eurocentrism not assimilation. Integration and assimilation has been pursued by colored people as a way to be equal citizen with whites and a procedure to make a social and economic advancement. Historically, the assimilation has paved way for the multiculturalism in the United States.
Second, American multiculturalism should be considered in the context of international society. The World War II and the Cold War stimulated white Americans to reflect their own racism. And a hostile foreign policy or a war against a specific country could be a barrier to the development of multi￢culturalism which seek to friendly relationship among various groups with different racial/national or cultural backgrounds.
Third, the social, economic, and cultural hegemony of white middle class has kept going on with the rising of multiculturalism discourses. The centrifugal power of multiculturalism developed with the strong centripetal force of white middle class.
Multiculturalism has changed the norms and ideals relating with race in the United States. Multiculturalism has encouraged racial/national minorities and women to have more confidence and self-pride. But these historical social background of multiculturalism is rarely mentioned and almost forgotten. As for the multiculturalism, it has different meanings according to the debaters. Some conservatives consider the multiculturalism as a kind of ethnocentrism that could be a harm to the unity of the country. Some radicals think that multiculturalsim hides the unequal situation and avoids to face the social and economic problems. These days, the most steady and ardent advocates are the corporations. With them, multiculturalism increasingly represents various life styles or tastes according to racial/national or gender difference, not social or economic inequality. The meaning of multiculturalism is changing, which is dependent on the racial relations, foreign policies, business marketing strategies, and international circumstances.
This article points three features of American multiculturalism. First, the most important driving force of American multiculturalism came from the civil rights movement. Therefore, the opposition of the American multiculturalism is racism and Eurocentrism not assimilation. Integration and assimilation has been pursued by colored people as a way to be equal citizen with whites and a procedure to make a social and economic advancement. Historically, the assimilation has paved way for the multiculturalism in the United States.
Second, American multiculturalism should be considered in the context of international society. The World War II and the Cold War stimulated white Americans to reflect their own racism. And a hostile foreign policy or a war against a specific country could be a barrier to the development of multi￢culturalism which seek to friendly relationship among various groups with different racial/national or cultural backgrounds.
Third, the social, economic, and cultural hegemony of white middle class has kept going on with the rising of multiculturalism discourses. The centrifugal power of multiculturalism developed with the strong centripetal force of white middle class.
Multiculturalism has changed the norms and ideals relating with race in the United States. Multiculturalism has encouraged racial/national minorities and women to have more confidence and self-pride. But these historical social background of multiculturalism is rarely mentioned and almost forgotten. As for the multiculturalism, it has different meanings according to the debaters. Some conservatives consider the multiculturalism as a kind of ethnocentrism that could be a harm to the unity of the country. Some radicals think that multiculturalsim hides the unequal situation and avoids to face the social and economic problems. These days, the most steady and ardent advocates are the corporations. With them, multiculturalism increasingly represents various life styles or tastes according to racial/national or gender difference, not social or economic inequality. The meaning of multiculturalism is changing, which is dependent on the racial relations, foreign policies, business marketing strategies, and international circumstances.
목차
I. 서론
II. 동화 정책과 다문화주의
III. 세계적인 구경거리가 되었던 미국의 인종주의
IV. 아프리카계 미국인의 민권 운동
V. ‘제국’으로의 발전과 다문화주의
VI. 다문화주의의 다면성
VII. 결론
Abstract
참고문헌 (30)
참고문헌 신청
http://www.answers.com/topic/multiculturalism
Nathan Glazer / 2009 / 우리는 이제 모두 다문화인이다 / 미래를 소유한 사람들
http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/search?vid=1&hid=105&sid=c4a8f328-40c2-4cad-a148-996b07f5f1cc%40sessionmgr112
Charles Taylor / 1994 / Multiculturalism : Examining the Politics of Recognition / Princeton University Press :25
David Hollinger / 1995 / Postethnic America : Beyond Multiculturalism / Basic Books :133
Nathan Glazer / 2009 / 우리는 이제 모두 다문화인이다 / 미래를 소유한 사람들
http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/search?vid=1&hid=105&sid=c4a8f328-40c2-4cad-a148-996b07f5f1cc%40sessionmgr112
Charles Taylor / 1994 / Multiculturalism : Examining the Politics of Recognition / Princeton University Press :25
David Hollinger / 1995 / Postethnic America : Beyond Multiculturalism / Basic Books :133
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
다문화주의의 이론적 검토와 정당화
민족연구
2010 .01
-
한국의 다문화주의 : 특징과 과제
HOMO MIGRANS
2009 .11
-
Multiculturalism in Postmodern Age
다문화와 평화
2010 .01
-
다문화주의 논쟁 : 담론과 구도
역사교육
2009 .06
-
[원어민]에 나타난 미국 다문화주의 비판
영어영문학연구
2009 .01
-
다문화주의의 역설
담론201
2013 .01
-
한국 다문화주의의 재모색
인문언어
2010 .01
-
영국에서 박물관 다문화정책의 발생 배경과 이론적 논의
민속학연구
2011 .06
-
Multicultural education in Australia
민족연구
2011 .01
-
다문화정책과 한인디아스포라
재외한인연구
2011 .01
-
프랑스 사회통합모델의 특수성과 다문화주의의 도전
HOMO MIGRANS
2009 .11
-
Reconsidering the Multicultural Movement toward the West Coast in Ishmael Reed’s Mumbo Jumbo
새한영어영문학
2015 .02
-
‘인간의 안전 보장’ 개념을 통한 다문화주의의 이해
다문화와 평화
2013 .01
-
영국, 프랑스, 독일 3개국의 다민족국가의 경험과 갈등
다문화와 평화
2013 .01
-
이민자의 다문화주의와 민족주의
사회와 철학
2013 .04
-
다문화주의 관점에서 한국어 교재의 등장인물 분포 연구
어문론집
2013 .09
-
다문화주의와 상호문화주의의 차이에 대한 한 해석 : 찰스 테일러의 견해를 중심으로
코기토
2017 .06
-
Cultural Depictions in the Writing Sections of High School English Textbooks: The Liberal and Critical Approach
영상영어교육(STEM Journal)
2014 .01
-
The Impact of Multicultural Family Children`s Service Utilization on Their Self-esteem Mediated through Multiculturalism1
Journal of Christian Education & Information Technology
2018 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0