지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper was studied about cognitive quality and aesthetic nature of <petit bourgeois>. Cognitive quality and aesthetic nature of <petit bourgeois> are "relative cognition and novel"s pluralism", "symbolism of limitary space and character"s polyphony", "form of memory and annotatory narration".
The first, relative realization was found at <petit bourgeois>. The relativist cognition, which denied absolute validity of all truth and worth, was revealed at narrator"s viewpoint and attitude. This narrator refused deny or confirm about all character. He is not assimilate any person, and keep distance. Even he objectify himself. Comedy of <petit bourgeois> has began at relative realization. And relative realization producted diversification of life and reality. Therefore this novel attain pluralism.
The second, space of <petit bourgeois> was symbolized, and characters shows polyphony"s quality. <Petit bourgeois> is novel of space. The writer set up characters which showed various situation of 1950"s society. So meaning of noodle making place above meaning of local place which revealed social condition of pusan. Noodle making place symbolized the space which revealed capital modernity of 1950"s society. And this novel showed polyphony characters, because of the symbolized space include autonomous and various characters.
The third, <petit bourgeois> was found form of memory, annotatory narration, quality of ideal and essay. <Petit bourgeois> was composed by the method that flash back the age of the korean war from 1960"s time. This form of memory coincidentally combine to different time. This form lead reader who syntagmatically see to different times. And this form combine various element of different times. The particular point of this form is annotatory narration. The narrator intervene the event, and interpret meaning of events and situation. Of course the narrator don"t speak conclusively. Meanwhile use of annotatory narration gennerate this novel to quality of ideal and essay. <petit bourgeois> is the novel that historical and philosophically cosideration about reality and life were consolidated than before.
The first, relative realization was found at <petit bourgeois>. The relativist cognition, which denied absolute validity of all truth and worth, was revealed at narrator"s viewpoint and attitude. This narrator refused deny or confirm about all character. He is not assimilate any person, and keep distance. Even he objectify himself. Comedy of <petit bourgeois> has began at relative realization. And relative realization producted diversification of life and reality. Therefore this novel attain pluralism.
The second, space of <petit bourgeois> was symbolized, and characters shows polyphony"s quality. <Petit bourgeois> is novel of space. The writer set up characters which showed various situation of 1950"s society. So meaning of noodle making place above meaning of local place which revealed social condition of pusan. Noodle making place symbolized the space which revealed capital modernity of 1950"s society. And this novel showed polyphony characters, because of the symbolized space include autonomous and various characters.
The third, <petit bourgeois> was found form of memory, annotatory narration, quality of ideal and essay. <Petit bourgeois> was composed by the method that flash back the age of the korean war from 1960"s time. This form of memory coincidentally combine to different time. This form lead reader who syntagmatically see to different times. And this form combine various element of different times. The particular point of this form is annotatory narration. The narrator intervene the event, and interpret meaning of events and situation. Of course the narrator don"t speak conclusively. Meanwhile use of annotatory narration gennerate this novel to quality of ideal and essay. <petit bourgeois> is the novel that historical and philosophically cosideration about reality and life were consolidated than before.
목차
1. <소시민>의 문제성
2. 상대주의적 인식과 작품의 다원성
3. 제한적 공간의 상징성과 작중 인물의 다성성
4. 회상 형식과 관념성의 강화
5. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (15)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-810-001204025