지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
A damages claim on the breach of a contract is governed by the legal doctrines including general damages, special damages and foreseeability in Korea. These three concepts are originated from the article 393 in the Korean Civil Code. The Korean Supreme Court held that proximate cause limitation is said to complement these three legal doctrines to limit the coverage of injury. The article 535 of the Korean Civil Code stipulates that reliance interest will be compensated within the limitation of expectation interest in the instances when a contract is not consumated. The Korean Supreme Court literally applied the article to the cases to breach a contract before the its consummation. However, it extended the application of the article to the instances in 1992 on the case of 91da29972 on which contracts are consumated and rescinded afterward. It upheld that the reliance interest will be used to account the damage in the instances of the rescission of contracts. It is reasonable to apply the reliance interest on all the rescission cases. It also upheld in the same ruling that the reliance must be recovered within the limitation of expectation interest. The ruling in this part is partially correct and partially wrong. To evaluate the ruling, we need to define the exact concept of reliance and expectation interest and explore the historical origination of these definition.
When the court of king"s bench confirmed the complaint filed by victims, it compensated them with damages based on reliance interests in the early enforcement era. But, expectation interest became dominated because it was very effective and simple to apply. Whenever we make a contract, we evaluate and specify the value of its enforcement. In spite of its merits, expectation interest is not perfect. After a contract is made, we need to invest in trusting its full performance, before it is not performed. As capitalism grows its power in the economic system, the investment should be protected. Reliance interest plays a good role to protect the trustworthiness of economic system. Professors, Mr. L.L. Fuller and William R. Perdue Jr. published their paper, the Reliance Interest in Contract Damages, in 1936. They insisted that reliance interest should be protected as damages of breach of contracts.
As explained, the Korean Supreme Court recognized the concept of reliance interest on the breach of contracts. We need to research fully the true concept of reliance interest and the role on the damages.
When the court of king"s bench confirmed the complaint filed by victims, it compensated them with damages based on reliance interests in the early enforcement era. But, expectation interest became dominated because it was very effective and simple to apply. Whenever we make a contract, we evaluate and specify the value of its enforcement. In spite of its merits, expectation interest is not perfect. After a contract is made, we need to invest in trusting its full performance, before it is not performed. As capitalism grows its power in the economic system, the investment should be protected. Reliance interest plays a good role to protect the trustworthiness of economic system. Professors, Mr. L.L. Fuller and William R. Perdue Jr. published their paper, the Reliance Interest in Contract Damages, in 1936. They insisted that reliance interest should be protected as damages of breach of contracts.
As explained, the Korean Supreme Court recognized the concept of reliance interest on the breach of contracts. We need to research fully the true concept of reliance interest and the role on the damages.
목차
Ⅰ. 序論
Ⅱ. 우리나라에서의 이행이익 및 신뢰이익
Ⅲ. 신뢰이익 및 이행이익 구분의 필요성
Ⅳ. 중복배상 배제의 문제
Ⅴ. 이행이익 범위내에서의 신뢰이익의 배상
Ⅵ. 結論
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (15)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
契約解除時 履行利益과 信賴利益의 관계에 관한 小考
재산법연구
2010 .01
-
계약완성의무의 위반과 이행이익의 배상 - 대법원 1999. 7. 9. 선고 97다7943 판결 -
고려법학
2010 .01
-
미국법상 이익구분론에 대한 기술적 분석(descriptive analyse)과 시사점
법철학연구
2008 .12
-
계약이행보증금에 관한 연구
중앙법학
2011 .09
-
The Tendency of North Korea’s Reliance on Japanese Technology
법정논총
1984 .02
-
契約解除와 損害賠償
재산법연구
2003 .01
-
정신장애인의 자립 개념분석
정신간호학회지
2016 .01
-
손해배상산정의 기준시
외법논집
2014 .01
-
국제물품매매에서 손해배상청구권에 관한 비교법적 고찰
무역상무연구
2018 .02
-
Damages in Multi-agent Contracts
법경제학연구
2017 .04
-
계약구속력의 근거에 관한 새로운 이론모델
중앙법학
2014 .06
-
채무불이행과 신뢰손해의 배상
재산법연구
2006 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
신뢰이익손해배상과 원상회복적 손해배상 : 이행이익과 신뢰이익의 이분법적 사고의 문제점
서종희
강원법학
2012
.06
계약해제와 신뢰이익의 배상에 관한 판례 분석
이종엽
사법행정
2007
.11
계약채무의 불이행으로 인한 비용배상
박영목
비교사법
2008
.09
[중요판례집중연구]민사중요판례연구-이행이익과 신뢰이익
김동훈
고시연구
2002
.11
계약 해제의 효과 : 중도금 지급 지연에 따라 지급한 이자를 해제의 원상회복으로 반환할 것인지(대법원 2009. 1. 30. 선고 2007다82226 판결과 관련하여)
박시환
법학연구
2012
.11
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-001270977