지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Silvanus (Σιλουαν??), as known as Silas (Σιλ ?), was an original member and leader of the early Christian community in Jerusalem (Acts 15:23), who knew Jesus and his traditions. He was selected as a representative of the Jerusalem Council probably due to his proficiency of colloquial Greek and early involvement in gentile mission. It is very much probable that he was an apostle as indicated by in 1 Thess 2:7. Paul’s omission of apostolic title in 1 Thess 1:1 and 2 Thess 1:1 might be because he did not have to include it once the name of the Jerusalem apostle was right beside his name (Πα λο? κα? Σιλουαν??). Silvanus was a co-author of Thessalonian epistles and Paul’s use of the first-person plural throughout 1 Thessalonians, with only a few exceptions (1 Thess 2:18; 3:5; 5:27), indicates that Paul took this co-authorship quite seriously. In his second journey Paul revisited his Galatian churches with Silvanus for the first time after his Epistle to the Galatians. Paul was with Silas, the official representative of the Jerusalem Council, who was carrying its decision about the circumcision issues. The presence of Silas and the official letter he carried must have spokenfor him with much more persuasion in his visit to the churches. During their trip, Silvanus transmitted many of the original Palestinian Jesus tradition known to us today, and learned Paul’s interpretation of the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, familiarizing himself to Pauline theological categories.
Paul and Silvanus shared the same understanding as to their physical labor during their missionary endeavor and fundraising for the ministry for the poor in the Jerusalem Church. Their consensus indicates that they shared many of Jesus traditions. After his arrival and ministry in Ephesus (Acts 18:5) Silvanus seems to have gone to the some of the area listed in 1 Pet 1: 1. Rainer Riesner’ s hypothesis that Paul understood the geographical framework of his mission in light of Isa 66:19 is very much likely because Paul draws not a few missionary principles from Isa 40-66, especially 66 as partly indicated by Rom15:16-24. If Riesner’ s reconstruction is correct, we can answer why Paul and Silas planned to go to Asia and Bithynia in their first journey. They probably planned to go to Pontus, Bithynia, and Cappadocia after their work in Ephesus. However, because of the problems in Corinthain churches Paul had to make unplanned trips to Corinth. Silvanus left Paul alone and met and joined Peter and Mark in those regions for evangelism. And then later Peter’s group including Silvanus went to Rome where First Peter was written. It is likely for Silvanus to have made significant contributions to the writing of First Peter, the author of which demonstrates his excellent command of Greek. It seems hardly possible to have been achieved by Peter, an “uneducated” (Acts 4:13) fisherman whose mother tongue was a Galilian dialect of Aramaic (Mark 14:70; Acts 2:7). Peter allegedly wrote the letter "through Silvanus (dia; Silouanou’)” (1 Pet 5:12). This inclusion of his name at the end of the letter probably signifies his participation in the writing of the letter. This explains why there are a considerable number of agreements between 1 Peter and the Pauline epistles, especially Romans. Standing in Petrine tradition, Silvanus helped Peter write the letter reflecting many of Pauline ideas in the letter.
The role of Silvanus can be summarized as being a “between person.” He stood between Jesus and Paul, between Palestine and Hellenistic Christianity, between Jews and Gentiles, and between Pauline and Petrine traditions. As we have seen, we should not underestimate the contributions of Paul’s co-workers in the mission of Paul and the expansion of early church. Without their input, the success of the early church in evangelization of the Mediterranean world would not have been feasible.
Paul and Silvanus shared the same understanding as to their physical labor during their missionary endeavor and fundraising for the ministry for the poor in the Jerusalem Church. Their consensus indicates that they shared many of Jesus traditions. After his arrival and ministry in Ephesus (Acts 18:5) Silvanus seems to have gone to the some of the area listed in 1 Pet 1: 1. Rainer Riesner’ s hypothesis that Paul understood the geographical framework of his mission in light of Isa 66:19 is very much likely because Paul draws not a few missionary principles from Isa 40-66, especially 66 as partly indicated by Rom15:16-24. If Riesner’ s reconstruction is correct, we can answer why Paul and Silas planned to go to Asia and Bithynia in their first journey. They probably planned to go to Pontus, Bithynia, and Cappadocia after their work in Ephesus. However, because of the problems in Corinthain churches Paul had to make unplanned trips to Corinth. Silvanus left Paul alone and met and joined Peter and Mark in those regions for evangelism. And then later Peter’s group including Silvanus went to Rome where First Peter was written. It is likely for Silvanus to have made significant contributions to the writing of First Peter, the author of which demonstrates his excellent command of Greek. It seems hardly possible to have been achieved by Peter, an “uneducated” (Acts 4:13) fisherman whose mother tongue was a Galilian dialect of Aramaic (Mark 14:70; Acts 2:7). Peter allegedly wrote the letter "through Silvanus (dia; Silouanou’)” (1 Pet 5:12). This inclusion of his name at the end of the letter probably signifies his participation in the writing of the letter. This explains why there are a considerable number of agreements between 1 Peter and the Pauline epistles, especially Romans. Standing in Petrine tradition, Silvanus helped Peter write the letter reflecting many of Pauline ideas in the letter.
The role of Silvanus can be summarized as being a “between person.” He stood between Jesus and Paul, between Palestine and Hellenistic Christianity, between Jews and Gentiles, and between Pauline and Petrine traditions. As we have seen, we should not underestimate the contributions of Paul’s co-workers in the mission of Paul and the expansion of early church. Without their input, the success of the early church in evangelization of the Mediterranean world would not have been feasible.
목차
서론
1. 사도로서 실루아노의 이력서(Profile)
2. 바울의 사역에 대한 실라의 공헌
3. 바울의 동료 사역자이자 예수 그리스도를 닮은 사람인 실라
4. 바울과 헤어진 뒤 실라는 어디로 갔을까?
5. 가장 가능성이 있는(the Most Probable) 베드로전서의 저자 후보(Candidate)인 실라
결론
참고 문헌
English Summary
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
바울과 선교
선교와 신학
1998 .03
-
Paul and Mission
선교와 신학
1998 .03
-
‘사이’에서 바울을 읽다 : 서중석 교수의 바울서신 해석
신학논단
2014 .12
-
서신의 장르적 특성과 바울주의의 발흥
신약논단
2020 .09
-
바울신학에 나타난 통일사상
한국기독교신학논총
2000 .06
-
바울의 Q 사용에 대한 연구
신약논단
2004 .03
-
초기 크리스천 공동체 내에서 여성들의 역할에 관한 바울의 신학/윤리적 전거
신학논단
2019 .03
-
바울 선교의 사회적 배경 연구
신학과세계
1994 .06
-
“바울에 관한 새 관점”(New Perspective on Paul)이란 무엇인가?
신학정론
2015 .05
-
Paul's Gentile Mission and Apostleship as Hermeneutical Exigency for His Presentation of Jesus as the New Adam
신약논단
2012 .06
-
바울 신학의 연구역사
신학과세계
1992 .06
-
PAUL`S ADAM CHRISTOLOGY IN THE POST-NEW PERSPECTIVE READING
장신논단
2014 .10
-
바울의 선교 전략으로서의 “재방문” 목회- 사도행전과 바울 서신 본문 분석
한국개혁신학
2020 .01
-
예수의 죽음 : 바울 신학에 있어서 그 의미
Canon&Culture
2008 .10
-
바울 신학의 중심 : 1980년대 이후의 논의와 최근 동향
신학지남
2011 .09
-
사도행전 17:16-34에 나타난 사도 바울의 타문화권 선교방법론
선교와 신학
2004 .12
-
서양회화에 나타난 바울의 이미지와 신학
신약논단
2015 .09
-
바울 신학의 중심 : 1980년대까지의 논의와 그 경향
신학지남
2011 .06
-
바울과 여성 선교 동역자들 : 로마서 16장을 중심으로
장신논단
1997 .12
-
한국선교 30년의 명암
한국기독교와 역사
2013 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-235-001729708