지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2009.12
- 수록면
- 1 - 146 (146page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The increasing demand for the public services often creates a inter-governmental tensions about locally unwanted facilities such as water treatment plants and public cemeteries. Particularly facilities operated within neighboring government"s jurisdiction easily become the causes of the inter-governmental conflicts.
Seoul metropolitan government operates a number of so-called locally unwanted facilities in Gyungggi-do. The local governments in which these facilities are located have actively made an argument they have paid costs for these facilities without any visible returns.
However, we still do not know this argument in actually true, because costs and benefits incurred by public facilities are hardly measurable, and if they are, the net effects can be diversely appraised in accordance to the perspectives.
In this context, this study analyses this kind of inter-governmental tensions in multiple perspectives. First, it describes the causes of the pending conflicts generated by Seoul"s facilities in Gyunggi-do. Second, it delves into the question of how to resolve inter-governmental conflicts and how to build a sustainable conflict-resolution system. By looking at the details of the successful cases, it finds that conflict management should be driven by specialists with long-term perspective. In addition, it argues that the power-based conflict management in no longer available. The key factors promoting intergovernmental agreement are interest-based ones, which increase the net benefits for every stakeholder involved.
Another contribution of this study can be found on the estimation of intergovernmental benefit transfers from multiple policy areas. According to the tax-incidence based estimation, Seoul annually transfers more than 2 trillion won to Gyunggi-do. In addition, transportation statistics show that 14-33% of daily users of Seoul"s transportation system are Gyungg-do citizens. It says that Seoul gives to Gyunggi-do a variety of benefits that are not easily measured. It also says that Seoul and Gyunggi-do, and local governments in Gyunggi-do are knitted related, and heavily interdependent in multiple policy areas.
In conclusion, this study does not argue that Seoul actually provides benefits to its neighbors more than the costs. However, as is true that locally unwanted facilities cause problems, it is also undeniable that Seoul"s neighbors enjoy positive externality from Seoul"s policy actions.
So, this study argues that the unmanageable intergovernmental conflict is worst scenario to every stakeholder. Since global competitiveness of Seoul metropolitan region is heavily influenced by internal intergovernmental relationships, building cooperative problem solving system among local government is foremost important for the whole region"s future development.
Seoul metropolitan government operates a number of so-called locally unwanted facilities in Gyungggi-do. The local governments in which these facilities are located have actively made an argument they have paid costs for these facilities without any visible returns.
However, we still do not know this argument in actually true, because costs and benefits incurred by public facilities are hardly measurable, and if they are, the net effects can be diversely appraised in accordance to the perspectives.
In this context, this study analyses this kind of inter-governmental tensions in multiple perspectives. First, it describes the causes of the pending conflicts generated by Seoul"s facilities in Gyunggi-do. Second, it delves into the question of how to resolve inter-governmental conflicts and how to build a sustainable conflict-resolution system. By looking at the details of the successful cases, it finds that conflict management should be driven by specialists with long-term perspective. In addition, it argues that the power-based conflict management in no longer available. The key factors promoting intergovernmental agreement are interest-based ones, which increase the net benefits for every stakeholder involved.
Another contribution of this study can be found on the estimation of intergovernmental benefit transfers from multiple policy areas. According to the tax-incidence based estimation, Seoul annually transfers more than 2 trillion won to Gyunggi-do. In addition, transportation statistics show that 14-33% of daily users of Seoul"s transportation system are Gyungg-do citizens. It says that Seoul gives to Gyunggi-do a variety of benefits that are not easily measured. It also says that Seoul and Gyunggi-do, and local governments in Gyunggi-do are knitted related, and heavily interdependent in multiple policy areas.
In conclusion, this study does not argue that Seoul actually provides benefits to its neighbors more than the costs. However, as is true that locally unwanted facilities cause problems, it is also undeniable that Seoul"s neighbors enjoy positive externality from Seoul"s policy actions.
So, this study argues that the unmanageable intergovernmental conflict is worst scenario to every stakeholder. Since global competitiveness of Seoul metropolitan region is heavily influenced by internal intergovernmental relationships, building cooperative problem solving system among local government is foremost important for the whole region"s future development.
목차
[표지]
[요약 및 정책건의]
[목차]
표목차
그림목차
사례목차
[제1장 연구의 개요]
제1절 연구의 배경 및 목적
제2절 연구의 범위 및 방법
[제2장 지방자치단체 간 협력의 이론적 배경]
제1절 지방자치단체 간 협력의 이론적 근거
제2절 지방자치단체 간 협력의 필요성
제3절 정부 간 협력의 저해요소로서 ‘갈등‘의 원인
제4절 갈등과 갈등관리
[제3장 거시적 관점에서 본 서울시와 경기도 간 외부효과]
제1절 조세 측면에서 바라본 외부효과
제2절 교통측면에서 바라본 외부효과
[제4장 미시적 관점에서 본 서울시와 경기도 간 외부효과]
제1절 난지물재생센터
제2절 승화원
제3절 시사점
[제5장 발전적 지방정부 간 관계구축을 위한 전략]
제1절 갈등 관리 전략
제2절 외부효과에 대한 제도적 보완 전략
[제6장 결론 및 정책 제언]
제1절 결론
제2절 정책 제언
[참고문헌]
[영문요약(Abstract)]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
수자원 이용을 둘러싼 지방정부간 갈등요인 및 관리전략 분석 : 장곡취수장 설치사례를 중심으로
한국사회와 행정연구
2004 .11
-
지방자치단체간 공동사업 추진 과정에서의 갈등관리 특성분석 : 광역교통시설을 중심으로
한국지역개발학회지
2018 .03
-
지방정부간 갈등-협력 기제와 영향요인-정읍 광역 화장시설 건립사업을 중심으로-
한국비교정부학보
2015 .01
-
동북아 3국(한ㆍ중ㆍ일)의 수도권 공간정책 비교연구 : 국가경쟁력을 중심으로
도시행정학보
2006 .04
-
정부간 관계에서 갈등관리에 관한 영향요인 연구 –정부간 관계와 대안적 갈등해결의 관계를 중심으로-
정책개발연구
2019 .01
-
교정보호시설의 입지갈등과 대응방안 연구
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2018 .12
-
국립서울병원 재건축에 따른 갈등영향분석
도시행정학보
2006 .04
-
IT산업분야를 둘러싼 정부조직간 갈등전략분석
한국비교정부학보
2006 .01
-
광역경제권 구축과정에서의 지방정부간 관계 연구 : 제도주의적 관점을 중심으로
도시행정학보
2011 .12
-
From Seoul Metropolitan Region to Networked Seoul Area? : Locational Dymamics and Specialization in the Seoul Metropolitan Area
응용지리
1997 .12
-
공공시설의 외부효과와 입지갈등에 관한 연구
국토연구
2003 .06
-
지방정부간 정책갈등 분석과 관리 전략에 관한 연구
한국비교정부학보
2011 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
지방정부간 협력관계의 영향요인에 관한 연구 : 광역, 시ㆍ군 자치단체를 중심으로
홍석균
,
김장기
한국사회와 행정연구
2002
.11
아동중심놀이치료에서의 아동과 치료자 반응 관찰척도 개발
이행숙
,
한유진
아동학회지
2013
.02
네트워크도시 이론과 영남권 지역의 발전 전망
최병두
한국지역지리학회지
2015
.02
지역기반 온라인 농식품 쇼핑몰에서의 지역 및 농촌 배태성과 웹페이지 생산자 정보의 역할
장익훈
,
최영찬
,
문정훈
외 1명
인터넷전자상거래연구
2015
.02
농촌지역개발 활성화를 위한 사회적기업의 발전방향과 과제
김광선
,
권인혜
,
김창호
외 1명
한국농촌경제연구원 기본연구보고서
2010
.10
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-359-001025775