지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
After independence, South Korean Government started to solve the liquidation problems which derived from the colonial relationships in the form of ‘reparation.’ But after all, Korean government came to negotiate the same problems with Japan as the ‘claims,’ because she lost the status of Allied powers in the Peace Treaty with Japan. As the results, no attention was paid on the changes of reparation demands because that has been regarded as the single concept contrasted with claims, while there came out a great difference between the reparation and claims in coping with the liquidation problems between South Korea and Japan.
Of Course, some studies have analysed the reparation demands of South Korea against Japan. But, those studies have only fixed the focus on the process in which the “The Protocol on the Reparation against Japan” has been completed in 1949, rather than studied the change of the character of reparations coming out in the process.
This paper elucidates that the Korean reparation demands has been converged into the claims which simply means the return, through the linkage with the change of the post-war reparation policy of US against Japan.
Korean Government has presented the next tree kinds of demands as the reparation. one is the belligerency reparation, the next is the reparations for the damages which derived from the compulsory mobilization into the war, the final is the reparation against the colonial rule. In spite that those demands founded on the different grounds, it has been recognized that those demands were different from the claims, because those all take on the political character.
But Korean Government has carried out the drastic amendment on the reparation against Japan, because she ought to harmonize the next two incompatible conditions at the same time. The first was to block the influences which came into being from the change of US reparation policy which transformed the aim of the restriction of Japanese productive ability into no-reparation principle, and another was to cope with the liquidation problems in the outline of US policy.
This article verifies Korean reparation demands have converged into the claims about 1949, which came to be proposed after the beginning of the South Korea-Japan normalization talks which started in 1951.
Of Course, some studies have analysed the reparation demands of South Korea against Japan. But, those studies have only fixed the focus on the process in which the “The Protocol on the Reparation against Japan” has been completed in 1949, rather than studied the change of the character of reparations coming out in the process.
This paper elucidates that the Korean reparation demands has been converged into the claims which simply means the return, through the linkage with the change of the post-war reparation policy of US against Japan.
Korean Government has presented the next tree kinds of demands as the reparation. one is the belligerency reparation, the next is the reparations for the damages which derived from the compulsory mobilization into the war, the final is the reparation against the colonial rule. In spite that those demands founded on the different grounds, it has been recognized that those demands were different from the claims, because those all take on the political character.
But Korean Government has carried out the drastic amendment on the reparation against Japan, because she ought to harmonize the next two incompatible conditions at the same time. The first was to block the influences which came into being from the change of US reparation policy which transformed the aim of the restriction of Japanese productive ability into no-reparation principle, and another was to cope with the liquidation problems in the outline of US policy.
This article verifies Korean reparation demands have converged into the claims about 1949, which came to be proposed after the beginning of the South Korea-Japan normalization talks which started in 1951.
목차
Ⅰ. 문제 제기
Ⅱ. 재한일본인 재산을 둘러싼 배상론의 변용
Ⅲ . 대일추가 배상론
Ⅳ. 배상조서의 성격
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
초기 대한민국 정부의 한일관계 인식에 대한 비판적 고찰 : 병합조약 무효의 이론과 적용
이동준
아세아연구
2011
.12
한일회담 개시 전 한국정부의 재일한국인 문제에 대한 대응 분석 : 대한민국의 국가정체성과 '재일성'(在日性)의 기원
장박진
아세아연구
2009
.03
한일회담에서의 피해보상 교섭의 변화과정 분석 : 식민지관계 청산에 대한 ‘배상’, ‘청구권’, ‘경제협력’ 방식의 ‘연속성’을 중심으로
장박진
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2008
.03
샌프란시스코 강화조약과 ‘전후 한일관계’의 원점 - ‘1965년 체제’를 둘러싼 고찰 -
요시자와 후미토시
영토해양연구
2021
.12
식민지배 과거사에 대한 비판적 성찰
이재원
역사와실학
2015
.11
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-910-000524116