메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김병준 (서울대학교)
저널정보
역사학회 역사학보 歷史學報 第217輯
발행연도
2013.3
수록면
107 - 154 (48page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In Qin-Han Empire, there were two kinds of borders. One was an outer border which distinguished the Qin-Han from other hostile enemy states. The other was an inner border, where the native barbarians had lived without being subjugated into the empire. In this sense, we should not confuse the barbarians already under Han’s control with the others residing beyond the outer and inner borders.
Many previous studies have made claims for the loosened control against barbarians along the vithin the empire borders, and the main evidences of their argument rested on the “Section Defender” and “Defender of the Dependent State”. Therefore this paper re-examins these two institutions based on newly discovered wooden slips. “Section Defender” was a just another kind of “Defender”. It was not installed for the purpose of controlling all the matters related with the barbarian sections. At the same time, barbarians under the Section Defender were incorporated and registered in the prefecture along with other Han Chinese. “Defender of the Dependent State” was not a civil institution which controlled the surrendered barbarians, but was instead a military institution. While the surrendered barbarians had been sanctioned to keep their nomadic life and constitute their own community with their chiefs(Dependent State), but the prefecture also imposed levies and corvee requirements upon them, by the Defender of the Dependent State for military conscription.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 帝國의 국경과 이민족의 분류
Ⅲ. 帝國內 이민족 지배와 변경의 都尉 조직
Ⅳ. 맺음말
[참고문헌]
[Abstract]

참고문헌 (5)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-910-003112485