지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Since Brown & Levinson(1978), studies on apologies have focused on linguistic forms and apology strategies and less focused on recipients’perceptions and evaluations of apologies from different cultural backgrounds (Chang & Haugh 2011). As Bergman & Kasper (1993) point out, the members of different cultures may perceive offense contexts differently and these different perceptions and evaluations of apologies may be reflected in output strategies of apologies. In other words, the same apology may be perceived as over-polite, polite, less polite or impolite between intercultural interlocutors in the same offense context. This study followed the same methodology as in Bergman & Kasper (1993) and Maeshiba et al. (1996) in order to quest intercultural comparability of politeness and discusses how contextual factors influence to the assessments on offense contexts and perceptions of apologies, comparing Korean data with Thai, American and Japanese results from the two previous studies. The results of this study indicate that two context external factors (i.e. social distance and power) and four context internal factors (i.e. severity of offense, offender’s obligation to apologize, likelihood for the apology to be accepted, and offender’s face-loss) are not independent factors in Korean, unlike in Bergman & Kasper (1993) whose results support to Brown & Levinson’s (1987) idea of the mutual independence of contextual factors. My data open the possibility that the contextual factors are interrelated and affect the perceptions and evaluations of apologies in Korean, which lead to choose different apology strategies in intercultural communications.
목차
1. 서론
2. 이론적 배경과 선행연구
3. 연구방법
4. 분석결과와 논의
5. 결론과 시사점
참고문헌
참고문헌 (1)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0