지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Textbooks of the History of Korea written for secondary schools in Korea should be considered as ‘fundamental resources for teaching and studying Korean history’, and they are required to follow the School Curricula Notice from the Ministry of Education. Therefore, when it comes to evaluate the correctness and quality of textbooks, it is necessary to examine whether they reflect the criteria given in the Curricula Notice. From this perspective, the Korean history textbook published by Kyohaksa Printing and Publishing Co. is low-quality. It reflects a conservative right-wing historical perspective. It distorts and ignores the nature of the School Curricula Notice, especially with respect to the section ‘Who’s history for whom’. The goal of the Curricula is indicated in ‘Principles and methodologies’ of compiling the textbook stated in the Preface, the contents shown by the titles of chapters and sub-chapters and its chronology, the composition of contents of the Curricula’s teaching areas in ‘Theory of historical inevitability or theory of self-victimizing choice’, and in ‘Tactical historical discourse and rhetorics of plot’, and its teaching and studying methods in ‘Distorting history by utilizing “Further Study” as an excuse’.
Utilizing the controversy about Kyohaksa’s Korean History textbook, the Ministry of Education and some conservative media have attempted to evoke the popular opinion that the government should publish Korean history textbooks through a ‘system of government textbook designation’. Considering the various realities of the education system in Korea, it is best to find a way to improve the problems while maintaining the present ‘Review and approval textbook system’ or ‘the principle of providing outlines of the educational curricula’. As a conclusion, it is emphasized that a good textbook cannot be written only with the good will of its authors, and that one should have the proper competency to write a good textbook whether the textbook is published under the government designation system, or the reviewed and approval system.
Utilizing the controversy about Kyohaksa’s Korean History textbook, the Ministry of Education and some conservative media have attempted to evoke the popular opinion that the government should publish Korean history textbooks through a ‘system of government textbook designation’. Considering the various realities of the education system in Korea, it is best to find a way to improve the problems while maintaining the present ‘Review and approval textbook system’ or ‘the principle of providing outlines of the educational curricula’. As a conclusion, it is emphasized that a good textbook cannot be written only with the good will of its authors, and that one should have the proper competency to write a good textbook whether the textbook is published under the government designation system, or the reviewed and approval system.
목차
머리말
1. 「머리말」에 보이는 편사 원칙과 방법
2. 교과서 서술의 주요 이론과 담론
3. 책략적 서사 기법과 수사법
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-900-003524989