메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
윤현석 (원광대학교)
저널정보
한양법학회 한양법학 한양법학 제46집
발행연도
2014.5
수록면
31 - 54 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Unfair support act of large companies which affiliated companies have provided subsidiary owned a controlling shareholder and its relatives with work multiply property of controlling shareholder family, the property has used to be an opportunity for the company succession. And this practice of large companies did ravage small business competing, obstructed fair competition. As a result, large companies resulted in the concentration of economic power.
To solve this problem, Commercial Law established the usefulness prohibition of corporate opportunity and directors and major shareholders were limited the trading of the company. Inheritance and Gift Tax Law provided to impose gift tax for profit through trading between special relationship corporate. Competition Law provided to impose fines for unfair advantage to specially related persons.
The Relevant laws for regulating unfair support act of large companies have been furnished. So now, I think compared to the point that there are no possibilities for duplicate regulation between laws, is the integrity of the regulation which has been controversial in the meantime.
As seen in cross-examine regulatory laws could see the difference between the law. The first, subject of interests established by a difference in the scope of related parties Commercial Law, Inheritance and Gift Tax Law and Competition Law.
The difference is borne by the party responsible changed. Therefore amended to maintain its uniformity is desirable.
Next unjustly support acts that does not for damages to the company are difficult to regulated Commercial Law. These actions can be regulated in the Inheritance and Gift Tax Law and the Competition Law.
That is because the unfair support acts as a significant scale are regulatory target in the Competition Law, and the profit from trading volume for more than a certain percentage are imposed the Gift tax in the Inheritance and Gift Tax Law.
In this case, if the controlling shareholder and related parties impose fines in the Competition Law and gift tax in the Inheritance and Gift Tax Law, the problems of duplicates regulations arises. In order to solve this problem, if controlling shareholders or related parties impose fines in the Competition Law, the plan which will deduct the penalty when calculating the profit it made a donation in the Inheritance and Gift Tax Law will be able to avoid criticism of overlapping regulations.
Future the laws revision related to unfair advantage act large companies should be suitable for the legislative purpose and removed Unconstitutional element.

목차

Ⅰ. 서
Ⅱ. 상법상 일감몰아주기 규제
Ⅲ. 상법세법상 일감몰아주기 규제
Ⅳ. 공정거래법상 일감몰아주기 규제
Ⅴ. 일감몰아주기 규제 관련 법률 간 비교검토
Ⅵ. 결론
【참고문헌】
【Abstract】

참고문헌 (18)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-300-002484055