개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2011.1
- 수록면
- 1 - 110 (110page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study is aimed to suggest how to improve performance and efficiency of government subsidy programs for agricultural sector. More specifically, it is designed to address followings: First, general definition of agricultural support and the classified catalogue of WTO domestic support are reviewed. Second, the current status of agricultural support is examined and a direction of its reform is proposed. Third, an appropriate size of agricultural support is considered. Finally, it suggests ways to revamp direct payments, individual subsidy programs, and the management system of implementing agricultural support, which are major issues in the agricultrual support reform.
Agricultural subsidies have brought about a set of positive effects on competitiveness, SOC, R&D, and restructuring in the sector, even though too many subsidy programs, each having different goal and target and inefficiency of their implementation have been pinpointed as shortcomings.
However, agricultural subsidies have also produced some adverse effects on the sector. First, they have spurred dependence on government aids and weaken farmers’ ability to stand on their own. Second, problems associated with direct payment are pointed out, including its concentration on rice and paddy field, overproduction of rice, a lack of incentive for upland field corps which are in short of production. Third, the projects as FTA countermeasures have so high portion of support, 74.4% that much concern is being voiced about deepening dependence on government and excess demand for the pojects. Fourth, there exist inefficient factors in the management system of budget and fund. Finally, government-oriented fiscal funds would stand in the way of private investment in agriculture.
This study focuses on the reforms of direct payments, individual subsidy programs, and their implementing system. The principle of the reforms is based on the consensus from the ’Committee of Advanced Agriculture and Fishery(2009.07)’. Each subsidy program is reconsidered to determine whether it should be abolished, be integrated with other program, be changed to loan program, or be adjusted with lower share of support, and so on.
In this stage, the reform of agricultural direct payments would be conducted focusing on the modification of rice direct payment. In order to mitigate overproduction of rice, the variable payment needs to be coupled with production costs. The newly discussed public-service direct payment is not widely shared opinions yet and would be difficult in securing enough fund for implementation. However, in the near future when further opening of domestic agriculture starts to lower profitability of upland crops, a comprehensive reform of agricultural direct payments will be required.
Agricultural subsidies have brought about a set of positive effects on competitiveness, SOC, R&D, and restructuring in the sector, even though too many subsidy programs, each having different goal and target and inefficiency of their implementation have been pinpointed as shortcomings.
However, agricultural subsidies have also produced some adverse effects on the sector. First, they have spurred dependence on government aids and weaken farmers’ ability to stand on their own. Second, problems associated with direct payment are pointed out, including its concentration on rice and paddy field, overproduction of rice, a lack of incentive for upland field corps which are in short of production. Third, the projects as FTA countermeasures have so high portion of support, 74.4% that much concern is being voiced about deepening dependence on government and excess demand for the pojects. Fourth, there exist inefficient factors in the management system of budget and fund. Finally, government-oriented fiscal funds would stand in the way of private investment in agriculture.
This study focuses on the reforms of direct payments, individual subsidy programs, and their implementing system. The principle of the reforms is based on the consensus from the ’Committee of Advanced Agriculture and Fishery(2009.07)’. Each subsidy program is reconsidered to determine whether it should be abolished, be integrated with other program, be changed to loan program, or be adjusted with lower share of support, and so on.
In this stage, the reform of agricultural direct payments would be conducted focusing on the modification of rice direct payment. In order to mitigate overproduction of rice, the variable payment needs to be coupled with production costs. The newly discussed public-service direct payment is not widely shared opinions yet and would be difficult in securing enough fund for implementation. However, in the near future when further opening of domestic agriculture starts to lower profitability of upland crops, a comprehensive reform of agricultural direct payments will be required.
목차
[표지]
[머리말]
[요약]
[ABSTRACT]
[차례]
표차례
그림차례
[제1장 서론]
1. 연구 배경
2. 연구 목적
3. 연구 방법
[제2장 농업보조금의 문제]
1. 농업보조금의 개념
2. 농업부문 투융자 및 보조금 현황
3. 농업보조금의 문제점
[제3장 주요국 농업보조금 정책과 시사점]
1. 주요국 농업정책 변화와 특징
2. 주요국 농업예산 및 보조금 추이
3. 시사점
[제4장 농업보조금 개편 방안]
1. 쌀소득보전직불
2. 직불제 체제 개편
3. 개별 보조사업의 통폐합
4. DDA에 대응한 국내 농업보조 개편방향
5. 농업보조금 전략
6. 보조금 집행관리체계 개편
[제5장 요약 및 결론]
[부록]
[참고문헌]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
농업보조금의 이해와 EU의 농업보조금 실행 동향
최혜선
동아법학
2014
.11
건강기능성 식품에 대한 소비자 인지도 조사
차용준
,
정희란
,
정은정
한국식품영양과학회 학술대회발표집
2014
.10
농림업 후방연관산업의 전략적 발전방안(2/3차연도) : 농기계·종자·산림종묘
강창용
,
김수석
,
정호근
외 4명
한국농촌경제연구원 기본연구보고서
2013
.12
TPP협정 대응을 위한 한국의 수산보조금 체계 개편 방안
신용민
,
박철형
,
남종오
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2016
.10
직불제의 성과평가와 시사점
김관수
,
안동환
,
민선형
한국농촌경제연구원 연구보고
2014
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-520-002582807