지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2013.12
- 수록면
- 1 - 165 (165page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Background of Research
Foul smells and water pollution due to livestock excretions deteriorate the quality of life and bring down land prices in surrounding area. The outbreak of livestock diseases seriously damages the regional economy. In spite of these negative influences, the livestock industry has multi-functionality such as a safe and stable supply of livestock products, preservation of farmland and landscapes, and the activation of the rural economy. Therefore this research classifies the externalities of the livestock industry as positive and negative effects, measures their economic value, and suggests policy measures to solve them.
Method of Research
The externalities of the livestock industry were classified and a theoretical solution was sought through the review of preceding researches. Implications were derived based on the survey for excellent domestic and overseas cases through literatures, site visits and the internet. In order to measure the economic value of the externality of the livestock industry, CVM was conducted through consulting and participation of experts. The degree of importance and results of policies related to the externality are evaluated to find implications by livestock experts.
Research Results and Implications
The result of the survey revealed that 65.4% of the population think that a positive function of the livestock industry is more important than its negative function. They are willing to pay 7,495 ~ 10,314 won every year per household to expand positive externalities of the livestock industry and to reduce negative externalities. The value of the externalities of the livestock industry is estimated at approximately 134.5 ~ 185.1 billion won for the next 5 years.
The top priority task for the sustainable environment-friendly livestock industry is to solve the externality of the livestock industry. The beneficiary pays principle and polluter pays principle should be applied to solve the externality of the industry. Specific methods are as follows. First of all, in order to maximize the external economy of the livestock industry, the government has to take the initiative in reinforcing food security and in preserving the environment and rural landscapes. Second, the future direction of livestock industry policy needs to be changed from quantitative growth focused on productivity to qualitative growth that considers safety and the environment.
To reduce the external diseconomy of the livestock industry, it is necessary to make livestock raisers pay environmental cost by intensifying education. The Livestock Excretion Pollution Management Center and Livestock Excretion Management Committees need to be established to solve the problem of environmental pollution and to reinforce monitoring the treatment of livestock excretions. An obligation to keep the records for livestock excretion management and disposal needs to be imposed on livestock farms. Additionally, development and distribution of the technologies for livestock excretion management and disposal, a balance between regulation and support for the livestock industry, intensification of the efficiency of support programs, and consumers" monitoring are required.
Foul smells and water pollution due to livestock excretions deteriorate the quality of life and bring down land prices in surrounding area. The outbreak of livestock diseases seriously damages the regional economy. In spite of these negative influences, the livestock industry has multi-functionality such as a safe and stable supply of livestock products, preservation of farmland and landscapes, and the activation of the rural economy. Therefore this research classifies the externalities of the livestock industry as positive and negative effects, measures their economic value, and suggests policy measures to solve them.
Method of Research
The externalities of the livestock industry were classified and a theoretical solution was sought through the review of preceding researches. Implications were derived based on the survey for excellent domestic and overseas cases through literatures, site visits and the internet. In order to measure the economic value of the externality of the livestock industry, CVM was conducted through consulting and participation of experts. The degree of importance and results of policies related to the externality are evaluated to find implications by livestock experts.
Research Results and Implications
The result of the survey revealed that 65.4% of the population think that a positive function of the livestock industry is more important than its negative function. They are willing to pay 7,495 ~ 10,314 won every year per household to expand positive externalities of the livestock industry and to reduce negative externalities. The value of the externalities of the livestock industry is estimated at approximately 134.5 ~ 185.1 billion won for the next 5 years.
The top priority task for the sustainable environment-friendly livestock industry is to solve the externality of the livestock industry. The beneficiary pays principle and polluter pays principle should be applied to solve the externality of the industry. Specific methods are as follows. First of all, in order to maximize the external economy of the livestock industry, the government has to take the initiative in reinforcing food security and in preserving the environment and rural landscapes. Second, the future direction of livestock industry policy needs to be changed from quantitative growth focused on productivity to qualitative growth that considers safety and the environment.
To reduce the external diseconomy of the livestock industry, it is necessary to make livestock raisers pay environmental cost by intensifying education. The Livestock Excretion Pollution Management Center and Livestock Excretion Management Committees need to be established to solve the problem of environmental pollution and to reinforce monitoring the treatment of livestock excretions. An obligation to keep the records for livestock excretion management and disposal needs to be imposed on livestock farms. Additionally, development and distribution of the technologies for livestock excretion management and disposal, a balance between regulation and support for the livestock industry, intensification of the efficiency of support programs, and consumers" monitoring are required.
목차
[표지]
[머리말]
[요약]
연구의 배경
연구방법
연구결과 및 시사점
[ABSTRACT]
Background of Research
Method of Research
Research Results and Implications
[차례]
표차례
그림차례
[제1장 서론]
1. 연구의 필요성과 목적
2. 선행연구의 검토
3. 연구범위 및 방법
4. 연구 추진체계
[제2장 축산업 외부효과의 유형화와 해결방법]
1. 축산업 외부효과의 정의
2. 축산업 외부효과의 유형화
3. 축산업 외부효과의 특성
4. 축산업 외부효과의 해결방법
[제3장 축산업 외부경제의 극대화 및 내부화 사례]
1. 국내 외부경제 극대화 및 내부화 사례
2. 국내외 축산업의 다원적 기능 활용실태 조사
3. 국내외 외부경제 극대화 및 내부화 사례의 시사점
[제4장 축산업 외부불경제의 최소화 및 내부화 사례]
1. 국내 축산업의 외부불경제 해결 사례
2. 국외 축산업의 외부불경제 해결 사례
3. 축산업의 외부불경제 해결 사례의 시사점
[제5장 축산업의 외부효과 해결을 위한 정책평가]
1. 축산전문가 설문조사 및 정책평가 개요
2. 외부효과 정책평가 결과
3. 전문가 정책평가의 요약 및 시사점
[제6장 축산업 외부효과의 경제적 가치 계측]
1. 축산업의 외부효과 추정방법 및 설문조사
2. 지불의사금액 분석
3. 경제적 가치 계측의 요약 및 시사점
[제7장 축산업 외부효과 해결을 위한 정책방안]
1. 축산업 외부효과 정책의 추진방향
2. 축산업 외부효과의 세부 해결방안
[제8장 요약 및 결론]
1. 요약
2. 결론
[부록]
[참고문헌]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-520-002560847