지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2007.12
- 수록면
- 111 - 145 (35page)
- DOI
- 10.34122/jip.2007.12.2.2.111
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Japanese government protects “phonograms for domestic distribution” through the Japanese copyright Article 113(5) measure from “phonograms for foreign distribution”. This measure defines “Acts considered to be infringements”, in the case where the owner of copyright or neighboring rights, who publishes in person or makes others publish such commercial phonograms as intended to be distributed within Japan (phonograms for domestic distribution) and publishes in person or makes others publish commercial phonograms which have the same contents as those of domestic phonograms outside Japan which are intended to be distributed exclusively outside Japan(phonograms for foreign distribution), the importation, the distribution or the possession within Japan by a person who knows that such phonograms are those for foreign distribution shall be considered to constitute infringement on copyright or neighboring rights, so far as such distribution prejudices unreasonably the interests as expected to be gained by the owner of copyright or neighboring rights.
The interesting reality about this measure is that there are many protests within the Japanese domestic consumers rather than from other countries that this measure is a very narrow-minded importation measure. The Recording Industry Association of Japan (RIAJ) claims that this measure is essential for the expansion of the exportation of Japanese commercial phonograms. However, The opposition suggests that this measure has a very serious effect on the domestic market of phonograms because the exceptional provision of “resale price” of the antitrust law of Japan (Article 23 of Act on prohibition of private monopolization and maintenance of Fair Trade of Japan)
applies to the phonograms at present. Furthermore, if this measure applies to the phonograms, it prevents the law from promoting fair and free competition for the interests of general consumers. This study analyzes several disputable points, such as, the balance with “right of
transfer of ownership” of the copyright law of Japan (Article 26bis (2)(ⅳ)) that prescribes the doctrine of international exhaustion. As well as the problems with the antitrust law of Japan, the legal position with the principle of free trade and the relationship between the centralized copyright and neighboring rights system of management business. In addition, it proposes that the parallel import policy of Japan are changing not only in copyright law but also in other intellectual property laws from the year of 2002. The purpose of this study is to interpret the anticipated problems that stem from changes in law of other countries, because the change has a considerable effect on
our country as well. Through this study, we can analyze Japanese policy changes regarding parallel import in recent years, exemplifying that the copyright law of Japan maintains the doctrine of exhaustion but changes to conditional exhaustion by means such as this measure. This hypothesis is exhibited also by the other intellectual property law revisions and cases.
The interesting reality about this measure is that there are many protests within the Japanese domestic consumers rather than from other countries that this measure is a very narrow-minded importation measure. The Recording Industry Association of Japan (RIAJ) claims that this measure is essential for the expansion of the exportation of Japanese commercial phonograms. However, The opposition suggests that this measure has a very serious effect on the domestic market of phonograms because the exceptional provision of “resale price” of the antitrust law of Japan (Article 23 of Act on prohibition of private monopolization and maintenance of Fair Trade of Japan)
applies to the phonograms at present. Furthermore, if this measure applies to the phonograms, it prevents the law from promoting fair and free competition for the interests of general consumers. This study analyzes several disputable points, such as, the balance with “right of
transfer of ownership” of the copyright law of Japan (Article 26bis (2)(ⅳ)) that prescribes the doctrine of international exhaustion. As well as the problems with the antitrust law of Japan, the legal position with the principle of free trade and the relationship between the centralized copyright and neighboring rights system of management business. In addition, it proposes that the parallel import policy of Japan are changing not only in copyright law but also in other intellectual property laws from the year of 2002. The purpose of this study is to interpret the anticipated problems that stem from changes in law of other countries, because the change has a considerable effect on
our country as well. Through this study, we can analyze Japanese policy changes regarding parallel import in recent years, exemplifying that the copyright law of Japan maintains the doctrine of exhaustion but changes to conditional exhaustion by means such as this measure. This hypothesis is exhibited also by the other intellectual property law revisions and cases.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 환류방지조치 규정의 의의
Ⅲ. 병행수입과의 관계
Ⅳ．독점금지법상 재판매가격유지제도
Ⅴ. 비교법적 고찰
Ⅵ. 결론
<별첨 1>
<별첨 2>
<별첨 3>
<별첨 4>
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
구 저작권법(1986년 개정 저작권법 이전 저작권법)상 음반에 관한 권리자의 판단 문제 : 현행 저작권법상 음반제작자의 판단기준과의 비교를 중심으로
저스티스
2015 .08
-
새로운 매체의 등장과 문화콘텐츠의 저작권 이용허락 계약 : 음반제작계약을 중심으로
문화산업연구
2008 .12
-
개정 저작권법 제29조 제2항의 문제점에 관한 약간의 고찰
홍익법학
2017 .01
-
PROTECTION OF DATABASE IN JAPAN : COPYRIGHT LAW & ALTERNATIVES
저스티스
1996 .09
-
교육정보화를 위한 저작권법의 과제 -미국, 일본, 독일 저작권법상의 교육관련 규정을 중심으로-
法學論文集
2009 .01
-
일본판 공정이용조항의 도입 논의
경영법률
2011 .01
-
저작권의 침해 및 구제
경영법률
2007 .01
-
저작권 사용료 통합징수제도의 법적 문제점에 관한 고찰
법학연구
2019 .12
-
저작권침해의 구제에 관한 연구
법학연구
2005 .10
-
모바일 스트리밍 서비스의 공중송신권 침해 여부
법학연구
2018 .03
-
표현의 자유와 저작권
경영법률
2008 .01
-
저작권법상 저작재산권자 등의 공연권 제한 사건 - 헌법재판소 2019. 11. 28. 2016헌마1115, 2019헌가18(병합) 결정 평석
인권과 정의
2020 .01
-
지적재산권 강화경향과 정보공유와의 관계에 대한 고찰 : 헌법이념상 저작권개념을 중심으로
법학연구
2005 .12
-
P2P와 저작권 보호
법학연구
2002 .12
-
인터넷上의 著作權保護 및 著作權法 제25조의 問題點
법학연구
2008 .02
-
저작인접권자의 공연권 도입 여부에 대한 고찰
재산법연구
2007 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0