메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이충범 (Hyupsung University)
저널정보
한국종교학회 종교연구 종교연구 제74집 제4호
발행연도
2014.12
수록면
75 - 102 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Traditionally, the thoughts and texts of Meister Eckhart have been dealt with by the areas of spirituality, mysticism, and philosophical scholasticism. The purpose of this paper, however, is to understand the thoughts of Eckhart, in particular his notion of Union with Godhead, from the perspective of poststructuralism. It has been well known that Meister had tried to reach to the Godhead via his unique concept of Abgeschiedenheit, Gelassenheit, Ledigkeit, and finally Durchbruch. The writer’s trial is to compare and contrast between the way of Eckhart’s union with God and Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari’s concept of becoming-imperceptible. In particular, it will be engaged in through their writing, “A Thousand Pleataeu”. Understanding the differences between the concept of becoming-something and creation or evolution in the traditional philosophy, the writer reaches a conclusion that Eckhart, through Durchbruch, went on to the ultimate region of becoming, that is, becoming-Godhead from the viewpoint of Deleuzians philosophy. Based on the Eckhartian texts, the region where Eckhart had reached through the union with Godhead, has neither any common aspect of quality nor quantity between the two. Thus, it is referred to as nothingness or the undifferentiated which is identified with tao(道), void(空), or the plane of immanence/consistency in Deleuze’s terms. By dint of this effort, the writer expects that the conversation between Eckhart and Asian religions will be revitalized in the future.

목차

〈Abstract〉
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 되기
Ⅲ. 되기의 전통
Ⅳ. 하느님-되기
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (30)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-205-001075312